Post

i have lived here my whole life, and i have never once seen a plane take off from the Willamette… …let alone do THIS. wtf.

259 reposts1.5K likes

Charles Lindbergh flew under The Bridge of the Gods which crosses the Columbia River at Cascade Locks, Oregon in 1927.

Wikipedia published its stall speed as 69mph so it may have been traveling as fast as cars on I-5 nearby. The aircraft, a Kodiak 100 short takeoff & landing (STOL) fixed-wing plane registered to a Seattle owner SNL Aviation LLC, could be seen by witnesses maneuvering on its floats... 1/2

before taking off from the water, flying toward the Hawthorne Bridge. Federal regs re minimum safe altitudes state “except when necessary for takeoff or landing,” pilots must fly at “an altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing w/out undue hazard to persons or property..." /2/

In the 1996 floods my uncle's sea plane broke away from its dock Milwaukie and got stuck on the supports of the Morrison Bridge. He then hired an Alaska bush pilot to fly it out of there during the peak of the flood. Sadly, I was out of town and missed seeing it.

I would have been so excited. I love float planes and flying boats so much I wonder if it's the same plane I occasionally see flying overhead

My phone hates its camera. The camera sensor hates moving objects and being turned on quickly and taking a good photo. I quick drawed faster than John Marston and managed a decent photo.

Before the Tillikum Crossing colon Bridge Of The People was built, I saw a suspiciously similar plane land heading north, between the Ross Island and Marquam. Rate of descent was extremely alarming. It was probably 60 feet from the traffic on the bridge

I remember the time I was walking across the Hawthorn and spotted privately owned Duckboat casually drive up the east bank of the river and off into the city.

1/2 I don’t think this is wrong or illegal- because he’s flying a floatplane.. on the water- boating rules apply, on first approximation. Airborne- distance/minimum safe altitudes apply- which normally *would* mean pilot was breaking rules- except- the minimum safe altitudes/distance rules

2/2 state-“Except when necessary for takeoff or landing” Now, FAA could say this is a poor judgement call to initiate takeoff here. And get him on careless/reckless. But I hope they don’t. There are plenty of “cowboys” who fly irresponsibly.This is a floatplane who judges takeoff wrong (con’t)

tail more than enough here - it's under the C shelf so they almost certainly talked to PDX approach on the climbout... which... (a) would love to hear that and (b) they must have been able to see it on the scope? IDK its weird...

Looks like he got airborne, perhaps later than hoped, suddenly realised he was unlikely to be able to outclimb the bridge and made a snap decision to go under. You can see the abrupt nose-down correction soon after liftoff. Sketchy!

I'm betting on instructive thoughts. This take off wasn't planned properly to start with, and the constant wing bank under the bridge looks like a wing salute :|

I have a vague recollection that someone did this in the early 90s or late 80s, but they flew under the Ross Island and had a lot more clearance

it's unbelievable to me that you didn't hop onto the wing. This was probably the one chance you were gonna get!

It looks like they thought they could clear the bridge, realized they'd risk stalling or hitting it and/or a vehicle on it and flattened out their climb to stay safely under it before flying over it Probably should have just throttled down a bit and taken off AFTER the 2nd bridge. Was dumb for sure

Oh sure, the Spirit of Portland's a real tough guy when it's kids in kayaks and Euro energy drinks, but when we really need a law-of-tonnage showdown? MIA.

Childish Pilot decision skills! Step taxi to Selwood, call ATC on you phone arrange you pop up! Start takeoff and clear all the bridges with ample room. It’s just the old aviation saying, “To Much Money, Not Enough Brains” This is what is killing GA!!

why on earth is this insanely stupid and dangerous practice allowed ? if he had hit the bridge, the damage might have been in the tens of millions of dollars

Holy shit, flying under a bridge seems so incredibly dangerous. But damn of all the days I don't go into the city! Would have loved to photograph this insanity haha.

Yeah, absolutely nuts. I just looked this up, definitely illegal, and breaks multiple FAA rules.