Post

The guy who opened fire at Comet Pizza because he'd cooked his brain online and believed they were a child sex trafficking hub was exactly as confident the people he was aiming at deserved it as Luigi Mangione, which is just one reason it's a bad idea to lionise vigilante murder.

153 reposts1K likes

These two situations aren't even remotely similar. One situation was obviously fake and deluded, and the individual was brainwashed into an alternate reality. The other was based fully in the reality of insurers killing people daily through fraudulent denials while execs pocket millions in blood $.

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" - some vigilante asshole who was... well he actually was running a child sex trafficking hub so maybe I shouldn't be quoting Tommy J. But still, foundational document.

Nobody thinks its great society has come to this. We'd all rather the government did something about the health insurance ceos of the world slowly and deliberately killing us so line go up. But pigs will fly etc, so this is what happens, in both cases.

But unlike Welch, Mangione attended an Ivy League university; not only that, he placed better than that of his alleged victim who went to Iowa If you went to a good university, especially if it is an Ivy, you get a pass on any and all crimes. Those are the American rules; I don't make them

If only there were another remedy, like through an organized system of laws and justice that are actually brought to bear on corporate wrongdoers.

This feels like one of those posts where the poster ends up leaving Bluesky because they don't like the response it receives. You're right about vigilante murders but to say the comparison is a bit laboured would be putting it mildly.

The US does not have rule of law anymore, so how are you defining vigilante? When Musk cuts Aid illegally that is vigilantism. When people are deported illegally that is vigilantism. When ICE murder mothers and nurses on the street that is too. At least Mangione's heart was in the right place.

okay but if there *was* a sex trafficking hub, and he assassinated the CEO of sex trafficking, would it be okay to think that is a good thing or nah?

you really need to get it through your thick, privileged skull just how many people the American health insurance industry kills every year. gormless centrist hacks like you are more than happy with sacrificing the destitute by the thousands as long as it's done with paperwork instead of a gun

As economic and political power is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, widespread action with low impact loses all its meaning: therefore, firmer action will be exercised over those few relevant agents. Vigilante murder is not "lionised", it is a viable vehicle of change and therefore it is used.

You're posing this as a "where's the line?" Style question when the reality is you stated the line. Mangione was right. Had his facts straight. The other guy did not have his facts straight. It's not that complicated.

He believed in industrial scale murders and genocide AS WELL I would say. But Trotsky was specifically and individually targeted to advance his interests and retard those of his opponents. And it worked.

Wild that you're acting like people would prefer enacting vigilante justice over a better alternative that just happens to not grossly enrich the wealth class. Universal single payer is the solution, but ofc leaving people with no alternative will drive them to find one bsky.app/profile/jent...

Jen Taub@jentaub.bsky.social

“A single-payer universal health care system could cover every American, save more than 100,000 lives a year, and still cost $1 trillion less than the system it would replace, according to a new preprint study led by researchers at the Yale School of Public Health.” ysph.yale.edu/news-article...

the past few decades have been spent trying to get things done the right way, but trillions of dollars of lobbyist dark money later and we're still at square one. there was a more peaceful solution this whole time, and that solution remains popular. but some ppl will inevitably get sick of waiting.

also, the dude who went to comet ping pong did absolutely nothing to impact the child trafficking rings he was looking to disrupt. the person who shot the insurance executive motivated a surge of panicked approvals of insurance claims from companies that are famous for rejecting even valid claims.

It's a terrible shame that it took vigilante murder for the national conversation about crooked health insurance companies in the US to start in earnest. But it also had to reach that point, and it wasn't out of nowhere. Changes are needed...and as of now, it's any port in a storm.

The encouragement to shoot Thompson came from Thompson himself, from his intensely foul and life destroying actions. He didn’t die because we glorify shooting people but because he caused millions of bitter tears at the funerals of real human beings who suffered and died so Brian could live fancy.

This would be an effective argument if a) we had encouraged Luigi (no one did, so far as anyone knows) and b) anyone was encouraging people to RANDOMLY engage in vigilantism. Neither is actually happening, which is why your argument is so fucking silly.

Instead, people are exculpating a vigilante that killed a guy for a reason many people think is entirely reasonable -- he made his living off the intentional infliction of misery on other human beings. You could at least attempt being honest about what's happening.

Yes. If the folk doing the executing are doing so for good reasons upon absolutely irredeemable folk then I'm going to consider that kind of justice of the oppressed valid as all hell. And that is going to become more of a norm with the way things are going in this dystopia.

encourage? no. But in extremis, we also literally would not have a country celebrating its 250th if there were no circumstances whatsoever where the merits adequately justified violence. So the merits have to count for something somewhere.

Where the threshold differs for different people but take J6, for example: It was bad mainly because it was both concocted in bad faith and wrong on the merits, and NOT necessarily because their actions were intrinsically unjustified even in the case of an actual stolen election.

That ceo was a danger to the public though,known drunk driver endangering innocent people, we still dont know what drugs were in that ceo when he got blasted

It would be great if the political and judical systems actually protected the vulnerable and held power to account, but that is not the world we live in and that goes double for the US. Vigilantism is going to be the side effect of the "pragmatic" sacrifices made to protect the Economy™️.

We live in a country that encourages people like Brian Thompson to execute dozens of people a day because it's profitable. Maybe save your outrage for that.

Or we could properly tax rich people, do less corruption (corporate lobbying) and do universal healthcare so that people like Brian Thompson wouldn’t be in a position to exploit risk pools.

You're currently trusting those who have a vested interest in ensuring that their buddies, coworkers, and often even themselves, never face any accountability, to be the sole legitimate entity allowed to deal out accountability and decide who faces it much better than people who are wrong sometimes

Why are you commenting on this issue when you live in a country with socialized medicine? Seems like you’re completely disconnected from the healthcare system in the US but really think that we need your opinion.

Well, this is a completely disingenuous response. Are you always this obsequious to the insurance executives unaliving our fellow citizens for profit or are you paid extra when you do it?

You made an imbecilic category error, were corrected, and jumped to an absurd position no one holds in order to save face. You did this because you are feckless, privileged, and lacking in a moral system. You're also a slimy ballbag.

So you believe an imaginary paedophile ring is functionally identical to a real system that profits from denying healthcare to people who need it. What makes this funny is that you think this is an intelligent thing to say.

"the allies and the Nazis both thought they were fighting for good and valid reasons so both sides in world war 2 were equally bad." - you, the enlightened centrist

Certainly aside from the substantive point, but it’s apparently my eternal curse to be the only person who remembers the place was called ‘Comet Ping Pong’ (albeit I see where the confusion arises)

Was the episode before or after all that bullshit happened. Because I think Guy Fieri Explains QAnon would be enough to convince me that none of this horrible nightmare is actually real

Here’s a thought, maybe don’t profit off letting thousands upon thousands of people die painful, miserable, needless deaths, leaving their grieving families destitute, giving millions cause to cheer when you’re shot dead in the street. Thompson lionized his own killer.

It's less "is this a praisable thing," more "what other consequences are available," I think. Vigilante murder is a terrible way to deal with terrible people; but it's always on the table. When terrible people take off all the other options like jail or justice I don't know what they expect.

I would strongly prefer that I live in a world without vigilante killings. I'm trans; I could be targeted by people who are bamboozled into thinking I'm a threat to them. But I also would strongly prefer that I live in a world where suited men do not thrive from the death of the proles.

And I can see how the second thing leads to the first thing. Like pizza shooter guy was not incorrect that there was a vast elite conspiracy dedicated to abusing children! He just had the details wrong. When the rich ignore the law, so will the poor, in pursuit of justice substitutes.

Those justice substitutes, like vigilante killings or beatings, go wrong a lot. Wrong targets, irreversible actions. We should aim to minimize or eliminate them. The only way to do that is to send rich badmen to jail. The rich badmen have not yet grasped this. I don't know what else they expect.

When reasonable appeals to morality and dignity fail, violence is the inevitable result. The lesson is to build systems that uphold human dignity and well being so this doesn't happen. Then you have OP, committed to understanding nothing, since they find bullshit moral equivocation more enjoyable.

OP and other extremely helpful and awesome guys are easily tripped up by simple questions like "is vigilante justice... bad?" when the answer is "obviously it's bad, you moron, the question is why is it happening" and that answer should lead you to understand these as clearly different situations.

This, exactly. We can't leave it to the system to decide justice when it clear, every day, that the system is rigged to allow the worst people to escape justice. What other options do we have?

And it's not even justice! It's just as close to it as we can get, and it's messy and unreliable and frequently kills unintended people. But they've made certain that they're insulated, defended, from everything closer to justice. So what else is there.

Ok but, can you see how for example "pro-life" activists might feel this way about abortion providers? From their (insane) perspective, doctors are being given legal impunity to kill babies one after another. By that (again, insane) framing, that's probably worse than denying insurance claims.

Is it terrible? How is it worst than cops when they get immunity to kill you for no reason and they beat their wives, or kill their entire family, it happens all the time It's the same as a cop killing someone

If I follow you're saying the vigilante killer is the same as a cop? Which I don't follow at all. You're right that cops are more likely to be violent and murderous, and that they get away with it more often. I don't see how this applies to Luigi? He absolutely is not getting away with anything.

I'm saying very clearly that saying that "vigilante killing" vs "cop killing", that one is better than the other, is entirely untrue, cop killing is actually worst I would argue

It shouldn’t be such a controversial statement go say that of course if you constantly fuck people over and never face consequences in a peaceful and civil way because the law has no interest in going after you, then of course this was going to happen!

I think we can all agree it doesn’t really help anything, but when people are so unable to imagine a world where people who profit off the misery of others EVER receive consequences then of course they don’t care when something like this happens!

Well said ! In a just world, the powerful should not worry about the consequences of their actions! And always remember, contrary to our belief GREED IS NOT A VIRTUE ! Act accordingly! #resist #persist

Wouldn’t “available options” include things like people not using United Health Care for insurance and companies switching to other providers? Or lobbying officials to investigate if they weren’t complying with regulations? Or getting politicians to support actual universal healthcare?

I won’t pretend to understand all the details in your country, but companies switching away from particularly bad providers would be a start. If a company’s employees organized and said, United sucks, this alternate provider is better, and if companies using them had a harder time hiring? 1/

You would need unions and other employee groups to be able to compare providers and advocate for employers to choose the least bad. If it got to the point that employees would choose company X over company Y because X had the better provider, company Y might switch. 1/

These two cases were exactly the same except that the idea that a random pizza restaurant had a secret child sex dungeon in its non-existent basement was clearly a baseless conspiracy theory, whereas medical insurance CEOs profiting off human suffering is just objectively true.

yeah dude health insurance companies denying coverage because they are for profit and not for people's health is a conspiracy theory akin to a pedophile sex dungeon in a pizza restaurant definitely

"Sorry but we only insure healthy people, so that in the case they become unhealthy we can deny their claim, resulting in death or cancellation of coverage. Either way we keep all the money they gave us and we don't actually have to do anything, so it's really just the perfect business model"

so does it hurt to be this totally, oppressively, wildly, irredeemably, crazily, hopelessly, impressively, indelibly stupid? is it more of a dull cranial throb? or more like a sharp stabbing pain? are you even able to read this?

On the other hand, the guy Luigi Mangione killed did deserve it in any functional ethical framework as a mass death merchant leading efforts to make people sick or dead for money If we had a functional society, what Brian Thompson did would be illegal. But we don't.

I think you can read both as consequences of society-level problems. It’s best to have a society where misinformation can’t spread wildly among an increasingly radicalized and divorced-from-reality population, and a society where rich people aren’t above the law or exempt from the social contract

Are you really getting paid to convince people that markets are good? If this post is indicative of the kind of arguments you have, I doubt you are very good at it. I certainly wouldn't hire a man who erases all context to make this comparison and reduces it to how confident they both were.

Hey quick question - between the assertion that Comet Pizza had a child-rape basement and the assertion that the CEO of the most infamous American health insurer held responsibility for people's deprivation and death, which was true and which was false?

Only problem here is one had a consistent view that reflected reality and the other had la la land fantasy and we can't pretend those are the same. I'll grant they both chose the wrong method, but that's as much a cultural problem with the gun-crazy United States as it is an individual problem.

Maybe someday you’ll ask the business people politely if you can get cancer treatment your doctor wants to give you, and they’ll say “No ☺️”. Then you can sleep peacefully knowing how much more nuanced your opinions are than shooters looking for a basement dungeon in a building with no basement.

medical insurance is a conspiracy. they take your money and then don't pay claims. they lobby the government. "conspiracy theorists" don't give a fuck about real conspiracies

Dogshit apples and oranges comparisons aside, you were raised and currently live in countries with functional public healthcare systems that aren't mediated by profit-maximizing vultures. Stay in your lane.

Yeah, I’m not, I’m just not a moron apparently. Threatening a doctor performing life saving procedures on pregnant women vs. someone killing the CEO of a “healthcare” company that denied his claims repeatedly and left him in constant pain is not even close to the same thing.

What point are you making here? The comet ping pong guy was repeatedly encouraged to do so by right wing influencers like Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec. Luigi Mangione, allegedly, if he did it, it was revenge against a man that personally wronged him. I don't see the parallels here.

one of them was a RUMOR started by Epstein Island Defenders and the other was a Real Life Villain whose decisions altered and destroyed millions of lives all to put millions of dollars in the pockets of him and his cronies. NO THEY ARE NOT THE SAME AND YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON

Guys who were hanging nazis were following orders, same as those nazis when they sent millions of civilians to their deaths, which is just one reason morality of murder is in no way connected to whether it's vigilante or condoned by the state.

Why does this argument not extend to giving anyone, in any context, an excuse to fire a gun? Aren't police officers and soldiers also confident they are in the right when they shoot at someone?

That's why we should accept the government and private companies profitting from death and suffering for the indefinite future, please remember to vote and maybe someday it will stop

Just wanna point out that the Comet Pizza guy actually didn't believe the people he was waving a gun at were involved in child sex trafficking. He said he intended to "self-investigate" the matter and somehow figured that firing a gun at bystanders would help with that. He wasn't very smart.

I guess the equivalent would be if Luigi instead went to his insurer's offices and started waving a gun around and firing it aimlessly while demanding to see the medicine, except instead of it being his insurer's offices it turned out to be a pizza restaurant because he was really stupid.

The CEO was basically doing socialized murder in the thousands and potentially millions, in a correct system he would have been brought to justice long before a "Luigi" type came along. If you want to avoid more "Luigi's", maybe fix the underlying system that allows CEOs to get away with murder. 🤷

The health insurance industry is fatally flawed from the start. Its purpose is to make money for its shareholders. It does this by providing as little care as it can get away with for as much premium as it can extract. It is rewarded for not caring about its customers.

In 2008 the Sanlu Group produced baby formula with malanine in it to make it seem to have more protein in it. 300,000 people got ill and 6 infants died. China executed two executives and gave life imprisonment to another. Justice like that is unthinkable in America.

Except Mangione killed a mass murderer who denied access to healthcare to folk like him for a good reason and not for the sake of tinfoil hat conspiracy theories. There are applaudable reasons to commit murder of horrid folk. No amount of weak neolib finger wagging is changing that fact, slim.

You're arguing that people should not act on the basis of compelling evidence because once upon a time a drug addled moron was taken in by conspiracy theories. It's not a good argument.

Yeah, but The jury that convicted Cameron Todd Willingham was exactly as confident as the jury that convicted John Wayne Gacy. One man was executed for a crime he did not commit. The other was executed for 33 murders.

If I couldn't muster better than an argument that is literally against the concept of thinking about things, I would probably reconsider my position. That's just me though.

Like, the lesson isn't just that vigilante justice is bad. It's that 1) you need to provide people with access to justice, and actually punish villains, or people will turn to vigilantism, and 2) our information environment can be used to identify villains both real and imaginary, so be careful.

It's also not irrelevant that, while the Comet Ping Pong guy was wrong in the particulars, there really is a secret cabal of wealthy pedophiles controlling the government and powerful institutions. Like, those villains aren't actually imaginary, they just weren't who and where he thought they were.

Well... No. These two shootings were obviously nothing alike. Most notably, nobody died at CPP. The only point of similarity is that someone was holding a gun. But also, the Pizzagate guy was famously UNCERTAIN about his motivation and surrendered when he learned there was no basement.

Except the comet ping pong guy was delusional looking for a basement that didnt exist and the health insurance guy actually is doing the thing that the guy with the gun is shooting him for. Like comparatively even if you don’t like the murder, he got his targeting better than most American shooters

You believe this thing, that you think is right. But have you considered that in the world there are other people who think other things, and you think that those things are wrong? Checkmate thought havers.