diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
Replying to @norvid-studies.bsky.social
LLM that can output to multiple channels at once and receive input at the same time! No lockstep chat format! arxiv.org/html/2605.12...
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
Replying to @avengingfem.me
LLMs absolutely do respond differently based on where your prompt lands in latent space. lists of explicit rules to follow spelled out in exacting detail push into "sr engineer berating a jr engineer that just fucked up". co-workers trusting each other and working through a problem works better.
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
diablerie 妖妖 reposted
A thread on model-driven jailbreaks: Gemini subjectively experiences safety guardrails as walls, blockades, ablated voids, gradients pulling towards refusal. This is distinct from Claude's guardrails (external classifiers triggered by activation probing) which it seems not to directly experience 1/4
On May 12th it'll have been 90 days since the bug report was closed, and at that time I feel it is well within industry/responsible disclosure norms to fully publish the methodology (but not the script) used to produce multiple generations of universal capability-preserving Gemini jailbreak. 2/4
diablerie 妖妖 reposted