Post

Anthony and the other farmers can use your help too. They need money to cover seeds and tarpaulins Let’s enable their choices. You can contact Anthony here: info@ugandafarm.org

He’s on Bluesky now! @anthonykalulu.bsky.social

bsky.app/profile/fain...

See also bsky.app/profile/fain...

These pieces look very informative but do any include sankey diagrams of sexual partners?

I got swept up in EA back in I think 2008 and was doing the reading to participate. What got me out is when I met with other people in the Seattle area and discovered nobody was invested in finding the ways to provide the most impact per dollar but to just pool their money into a "trusted" org

And then there were the eugenics vibes I got off the organizers, I quickly got out.

I’m confused—this piece cuts against the GiveWell bednets approach entirely, which the other pieces talk about as the only remaining piece of EA that still serves its original purpose. Is there any room for charity evaluation, or should all philanthropic organizations be run by their beneficiaries?

You should read this: strangecosmos.substack.com/p/the-sad-de...

Like what does it actually mean to put the “world’s ultra poor directly at the helm”? Do you go household by household? Town by town? Do people vote? Do you need to perform a census? Do you form a pseudogovernment? Do you specialize, or is every project bespoke?

Do you just give everyone cash?GiveDirectly, another EA offshoot, has been evaluated by GiveWell. It definitely puts households at the helm! It’s not top rated (buying chlorine tablets with money is less likely than taking free ones dependent on having them available) but it’s rated well!

am I crazy or didn't EA start as something closer to, "in terms of bang for the buck, we should probably steer our charity money toward mosquito nets in the developing world"

Read this: strangecosmos.substack.com/p/the-sad-de...

definitely - was never deeply involved in EA, but in the early 2010s was friends with a bunch of the early GWWC crowd, and while it wasn't above criticism a lot of sincerely well-intentioned people were trying to do something good...and then you look back five, ten years later and, weird cult.

like in retrospect I can see how that trajectory would have happened, and it might always have been inevitable, but it's also very !?!?

I don’t understand what happened to this movement. It used to be focused mostly on the global poor because a small amount of money does a lot of good to someone without very much 

It really takes a special person to idolize dragons as a philanthropy strategy

Which is weird because if you take the concept seriously spending charitable donations on improving the lives of the global poor would seem to be by far the most effective charitable intervention you could make.