Dan Bowen

Dan Bowen

@bowendc.bsky.social

Political scientist and Public Policy Graduate Director @TCNJ.

875 followers333 following265 posts

Dan Bowen reposted

Replying to @jakemgrumbach.bsky.social

We found that as of right now 73% of your campaign donation goes back to the consultants and vendors (!!!), four times more than just 20 years ago. Only 13% to ads. Even I was shocked.

Dan Bowen reposted

This is remarkably dangerous. Polls are one way we understand the integrity of election results. They are a tool of democracy. Here is a vengeful regime official implying that networks can be punished for polls they don't like.

Kevin Collier @kevincollier.bsky.social

In any other admin, this would probably be the most outrageous official statement ever made by a sitting FCC director: Strongly implying that the government forbids broadcast networks from reporting on the president's falling poll numbers. (Sorry to paste from twitter but that's where he posts.)

Dan Bowen reposted

Dan Bowen reposted

We've probably learned more about American politics from the ANES than any other single data source. The same is true for the GSS and sociology. Both of these are gone if Congress acquiesces to these NSF cuts.

Dan Garisto@dangaristo.bsky.social

NEW: In March the White House released an FY27 budget request that zeroed out the National Science Foundation's directorate of Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences (SBE). For months it was unclear what would happen. Now, with FY26 over, the damage to SBE is coming to light. My reporting:

Wow - Breadstick Linux is the real deal - desktop Linux apps easily accessible on Android phones and tablets. I installed R, RStudio, VSCode, and Positron in a few minutes, now working on quarto files by sshing into home pc.

Dan Bowen reposted

Solomon: cut the baby in half Mathematician: good. Now cut it in half again and continue cutting it in halves until the partitions are small enough to fit smoothly along an irregular curve. The number of cuts will approach infinity as the sum converges to the exact definite integral

Dan Bowen reposted

New paper with @mjnelson.bsky.social Affluent + highly educated are more knowledgeable about state policies. Issue publics reduce knowledge disparities for some groups (LGBT on LGBT issues, women on abortion), but these disparities remain within issue publics. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

cambridge.orgCan Issue Publics Overcome Inequalities in State Policy Knowledge? | State Politics & Policy Quarterly | Cambridge CoreCan Issue Publics Overcome Inequalities in State Policy Knowledge?

TCNJ is hiring for a TT position in IR at rank of assistant professor! Pay is good; NJ is (obviously) the best; collegial and friendly department; easy access to Philly/NYC; good students. I'm not on the search committee but very happy to answer questions about TCNJ and the area. Apps due 11/1 👇

What do voters want from their elected leaders? What causes voters to vote for the party/candidate they do? What causes potential voters to turn out to the polls? What ultimately decides election outcomes between equally-matched parties? These are distinct questions and each have different answers.

This is right. In fact, this is the mistake of the Biden Admin/Dems. Post 2020, they interpreted Trump's defeat as a repudiation of Trump rather than a "sign of the times" response to a global pandemic. Assuming Dems win again in 26 and 28, they will find voters ready to blame them once in power.

Will Stancil@whstancil.bsky.social

Obviously, Trump is terrible and I'm not arguing you should feel bad for him. But this dynamic, where the public is freaking out about prices MORE THAN 1979, despite inflation BEING 3.4%, will kill progressive policy stone-cold flat-out dead. And there is ZERO reason to think it'll end with Trump.

Dan Bowen reposted

This weekend from @gelliottmorris.com: CBS and The Economist both released polls conducted on YouGov covering a similar period. CBS was D+8 and the Economist was D+11 on the generic ballot. CBS asked the normal generic ballot question. Economist named candidates + parties. Big difference in results

gelliottmorris.comIf Democrats win, one reason will be great recruitmentPlus, Democrats hit +7 in our generic ballot average for the first time this cycle. Your weekly political data roundup for September 13, 2026.

Dan Bowen reposted

Replying to @jacobtlevy.bsky.social

Money that comes into the United States government is government revenue. It is part of the public fisc. There's not "taxpayer money" and then "extra bonus money outside the rules." It's all taxpayer money. And spending *any* of it requires Congressional authorization. 2/

Dan Bowen reposted

Replying to @zingherpolisci.bsky.social

Republicans used to have a big turnout advantage in Midterms (see 2010 & 2014) because their core supporters were more engaged and likely to show up than the Democrats. Trump chased a bunch of these types of high SES voters out of the party--they're Democrats now. 2/x

Dan Bowen reposted

Meta is a creep who will _never_ take no for an answer, and never stop trying to ignore their lack of consent. Every media & regulatory organization in the world seems determined to ignore this reality; I genuinely don't understand why. Today's settlement is so that Meta can keep violating consent.

Dan Bowen reposted

I need help from the bluesky hive mind: I’ve been asked to consult on a law suit and they want to know my hourly rate and retainer fee. So, uh, what should I say? How does one determine such a number?

Dan Bowen reposted

Many many many people (like half of my students) wanna do DiD with a continuous treatment variable. When I first read the working paper version, I was like "well I can't do much with this knowledge until they provide some code"--but now there's an R package! bcallaway11.github.io/contdid/

bcallaway11.github.ioDifference-in-Differences with a Continuous TreatmentProvides methods for difference-in-differences with a continuous treatment and staggered treatment adoption. Includes estimation of treatment effects and causal responses as a function of the dose, ev...

Dan Bowen reposted

In Philly, I have seen vague orange signs warning about irresponsible development ("Their Profit. Your Loss!"). The Inquirer traced them to the Carpenters union, working to mobilize residents into zoning meetings. My work w/ Asya Magazinnik & Anna Weissman helps explain their logic.

Dan Bowen reposted

I think some history is important here. After HRC lost in 2016, there was a very strong sense among "the establishment" that the party needed to move left.* *I experienced this personally, because all of a sudden I was getting invited to foreign-policy events. 1/x

Oliver Willis@owillis.bsky.social

Because the party has been ignoring them.

Dan Bowen reposted

Here's a little something that might interest a number of you in my network, part of a forum in the Journal of Public Policy: www.cambridge.org/core/journal.... Many thanks to editor Josh Ryan and the commentators Samuel Bagg, Tara Grillos, Agustin Markarian, and Mary Scudder!

cambridge.orgOn policy responsiveness: conditions for effective demand and supply | Journal of Public Policy | Cambridge CoreOn policy responsiveness: conditions for effective demand and supply - Volume 46 Issue 2

Dan Bowen reposted

Latest version of Positron can open xlsx files in the data viewer(!) and it has a dropdown menu now for previewing different formats of #QuartoPub documents And—most importantly, but also from a few weeks ago, so less new—the plots panel can pick up dimensions from chunk options!!!! #rstats

Dan Bowen reposted

For years I've tracked billionaire excess. Each year I show students a chart that blows their minds. This year I had to redraw it for a trillionaire: Elon Musk, $1.32T. Depressing that we're here. Silver lining: couldn't have happened to a less deserving person, proof that wealth ≠ merit.

stanford.eduElon Musk's $1.32 Trillion, to ScaleThe first trillionaire's fortune, one pixel per $1,000 — scroll past every dollar, and see what a fraction of it could do instead.

Dan Bowen reposted

How has the US added housing supply since 2000? Are conservative places building a lot more than liberal places? In new research, I show that: —Additional homes were disproportionately in high-income, conservative, greenfield areas —BUT infill growth was more likely to be located in liberal areas

tandfonline.comThe Paradox of Housing Supply Growth: Conservative Sprawl and Liberal Infill in the 21st-Century United StatesHousing affordability is declining in the United States. To explain this phenomenon, many scholars and policymakers point to slowing construction, which they argue is particularly troublesome in co...