Post

If you’re planning on watching any Lynch, my advice is: don’t watch any analysis videos, don’t think about what stuff is “supposed” to mean, just get your own unique experience from it!! I think people have become far too concerned with the “correct” interpretations of media. Just experience it!!!

1.9K reposts12.1K likes

I have no interest in virtual games, but I’m following you for this skeet and thread alone. You are one of those rare people who makes a point of empowering others. Thank you!

The takeaway is that Lynch even refrained from making analyses public because he truly thought there is no correct answer about what you're supposed to take away from his movies. It could be anything you want, even if it sounded stupid to him.

Yeah, have faith in your experiences, but some of the explainer videos are actually quite good because they enhance your experience. It’s not like understanding the film better annihilates a piece of your life.

Honestly, if you come away from your first viewing of any of his work without thinking at any time to yourself “what the fsck did I just watch?” you probably did a disservice to yourself at some point. The absurdity is the point. The art is to be observed and understood on an individual level.

Some of my favorite people are full of errors. It’s not about following them, as I don’t follow anyone specifically as a way of thinking, living or loving. I think it’s important to take in others views. See what makes sense and challenge yourself with what doesn’t make sense.

I mean this is absolutely true, but on the other hand, after you're done, it's really fun to hang out with other people and trade insights. Videos and other analysis are great, but find the people that share your enthusiasm and play with ideas ... on thc

People can give you insights to Lynch's work, ways to look at it. But anyone who will break it down and tell you what it means is 1. wrong and 2. doing you a disservice Lynch's work is not meant to be solved, it is meant to be contemplated

I always saw that as a beautiful thing about Lynch's works. Surreal and abstract art is meant to be a personal experience and there's no "correct" way to interpret it. If it feel right to you than it is right and no one can take that away from you.

One of my favorite memories is sitting with the love of my life in a car outside a diner in Seattle, unable to get out because we were both too busy unpacking and talking about the movie we’d just seen, Lost Highway. Diner analysis is the best of all analyses.

I recently recorded a commentary for Piotr Szulkin’s decidedly Lynchian film ‘Golem’, and dug out an interview in which the interviewer kept trying to pin Szulkin down to pat “explanations” and Szulkin politely but firmly refused every time, saying that that was the critic’s job and not his.

wild take. does cinema need to be easy and conventional to be good? he always gave viewers all the pieces, it was just on us to put them together. which to be fair is not for everyone but that in no way means it's bad.

Yeah. His stuff is all about jungian dream logic and the more of it you watch, the more you see the same themes and topics from different angles. He was also a prolific painter who approached making films like a painter. Finally, his audio mixes and editing are world class.

This is the most important thing that Lynch taught me. Art speaks for itself. You shouldn't let things as crude as words taint your experience with it.

Will Twin Peaks fulfill a similar purpose that Chrono Cross does for me? (a wonderfully convoluted work ripe for me to overthink, eventually leaving me unable to differentiate between mistakes and conscious, calculated worldbuilding decisions)

I think it's interesting to hear and discuss how others think and feel about a piece of media (even in the form of an analysis video, or a reddit post), but I don't think anyone should be telling you how *you* should think and feel about it. (I obviously don't recommend analyses *before* watching)

Or just watch “The Straight Story” and have a nice cry. Unbeknownst to all, Richard Farnswarth a stunt man who played Alvin Straight was battling cancer throughout the shoot and a year after it was released was in so much pain he committed suicide.

Not immediately, but watching analysis later can bring up things you never would've noticed, I think it's okay to watch some after you've had time to sit with it. Now a LORE style video on Lynch stuff, avoid like the plague.

What if you watched what everyone thinks is brilliant and didn’t like it or feel moved by it at all? I’ve then gone and read opinions and still don’t vibe. AITA? I enjoy plenty of other deep, heavy, and dark things.

Apple & Vudu need to get smart about running heavily discounted movies when celebrities depart us. It would give them a huge spike in revenue and give us a taste of something from their lifetime's worth of work. #RIPLynch

When I was in school in the 80s, my roommate and I watched Blue Velvet (tape from Blockbuster, I think?) It was midnight when it ended. We went out & bought a pack of cigarettes & watched it again to better catch all the symbolism. Disturbing, but great film. Smoked all the cigarettes.

Is Inland Empire worth getting through? I understand it’s absurd but then it started being terrifying for no reason I could explain and I had to turn it off. The Winkies scene in Mullholland Drive did the same but I love that movie.

If you’re “getting through” it, give up. It’s supposed to be entertainment, not a chore. No one is smarter than you or dumber than you for watching all the way through (although some have questioned my sanity for watching it so many times).

Absolutely. Lynch’s work isn’t a puzzle to be solved—it’s a dream to be felt. Let it wash over you, get lost in the mood, the sound, the weirdness. Meaning isn’t something you find in his films, it’s something that finds you.

This is my favorite part of Lynch. It’s simply “how does it make you feel?” How do YOU interpret it. He made art that was meant to be felt, not explained. A true one of one.

If there's any creator that created works of art so that the audience could make their own interpretations, and even multiple interpretations within them, it's Lynch. That's the spirit of his work, to me.

That said, I do like the RLM videos on Twin Peaks, if only because they're not concerned with 'the definitive answer' and just present multiple interpretations when they do talk about interpreting the work which is waaaay more interesting.

Yeah!! and I’m definitely not against this type of discussion, but it feels that some people have become so obsessed with it, and even just watching analysis videos without seeing the original thing which is like 🙉

100%. Some people just want to 'know things' vs. experiencing them, and Lynch is very much an experience! There's one set of analysis videos in particular about Twin Peaks which I feel misses the point in how they seem so sure they 'cracked the code' ahaha.

My hot take, spoilers do ruin stories. They remove mystery, suspense, surprise, all extremely important elements of storytelling. Too many of us get bored when we feel confused or lost, or when we linger in a moment or feeling. But those things are the cadence and pacing of storytelling.

I agree. I saw "Mulholland Dr." at a theatre in suburban Detroit way back when and people walking out were fucking furious. I'd like to think Lynch was somewhere off in the distance chuckling to himself about playing us for suckers. And "The Straight Story" is a masterpiece.

David Lynch was, first and foremost, an artist. When you view anything Lynch, view it as his artistic expression and let it take you wherever it goes. Draw your own conclusions as though you were examining a painting.

In other words, raw dog it. Totally agree on checking any sort of pre-chewed “analysis” at the door when venturing into a Lynch “experience” (because that’s what it is, essentially; more so than just a film, TV show, or whatever).

My first exposure to his work was coming across an episode of Rabbits on YouTube, and boy howdy heck would that experience not have been as powerful and weird and interesting as it was if I had had any idea what I was getting into.

David Lynch's Masterclass was fascinating. He considered his films "moving paintings" that aren't necessarily meant to make sense, but to stir meaning in the individual experiencing them.

I agree with ignoring analysis videos. However, I absolutely push people on the idea of discussing their own theories and interpretation essays online because honestly that is 50% of the fun of watching Lynch for me - how wildly different people's watches can be.

Amen, bring back thinking deeply about what something means to you personally instead of immediately searching "twin peaks explained" on Google. I know a couple of people that gun it for their phones immediately after the credits roll on certain movies, and I'm always like "please stop"

Obviously, I see the irony in this as I myself write analysis, and of course I feel that we should continue to write it. It's essential. But I also feel like giving your own interpretation some time to manifest is just as important.

This is why that Guitar Hero video you made stuck with me. Despite the decently high number of factual errors, it had an emotional core to it that made it clear why you wanted to make it. So many other video essayists don’t have that personal drive to their videos.

there’s not really a right or wrong place to start! Twin Peaks is great if you want to watch a full series. But movie-wise, you can just kind of pick whatever might be available to you. Some of his stuff might resonate with you while others don’t. I’m a big fan of Wild at Heart personally!

"Elephant Man" introduces one to Lynch's command of visuals (working with cinematographer Freddie Francis), and his skill as a story-teller ... though the film should NOT be read as a documentary! Embellishments were committed.

I like watching analysis videos of movies & video games, but only to hear a different perspective, and maybe gain some deeper understanding of the methods & techniques used to achieve the finished film or game. It's just something to listen to and think about while I'm working

In terms of personal enjoyment, I agree. Like it, dislike it, it’s all up to you. However, I disagree on the “supposed to mean” part. Nearly all artists have a specific idea on what their work means. There is a “correct” interpretation.

My advice is the opposite: watch analyses (but not those that try to "explain" his art), listen to interviews with him and absorb yourself in his world through his YouTube posts, etc. He's a loveable man.

I saw Eraserhead three times before realizing it was just meant to be experienced. Just a surreal little world with its own rules. It taught me so much.