Eleanor Saitta

Eleanor Saitta

@dymaxion.org

Thinking about security, failure, change, art, and living. Recruiting barbarians; complicate your narrative. Fractional CISO to startups via Systems Structure Ltd. HEL/NYC/LON

195 followers253 following216 posts

Eleanor Saitta reposted

This whole thread is informative but the key take-away is this

Bruno Dies@brunodias.dev

I don't know that there is a template or a "secret sauce" or a clear-cut lesson to take from this. But if there is one it's the idea of treating social media as the hostile territory that it is, of actually acting like you are a participant in propaganda warfare and not like a consumer.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Replying to @lu.is

Don't just demand digrams for state machines, demand declarative specifications for them that are converted to procedural code *deterministically*. Nothing else works reliably, including human post-hoc review of code.

I am tired of watching (and dealing with the fallout of) progressives/the center left/"liberals" across the west giving up on the idea of universal human rights and instead fighting to throw people to the fascists to save their own skin. It never works. Fight where you stand or die where you kneel.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Hi. I, a trans woman, am the Executive Producer of this show. I wrote the question. He called trans girls men. He has now said it in three different places in the past week.

This post is unavailable.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Contractually obligated to repost anything that moderation labels as "intolerant against men"

lastpositivist.bsky.social@lastpositivist.bsky.social

Brazil going the way of South Korea. Basically around the world women are desperately trying to keep power out of the hands of incredibly stupid fascistic grifters while men keep trying to hand it over. Men are an embarrassing cringe gender.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

(It is, forgive me, a bit funny that people writing programming languages competing with C have spent a decade agonizing about not being able to convincingly beat C’s speed specifically on Brotli compression, and now it turns out C’s fast Brotli was insecure.)

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Fire everyone on the cybersecurity team who had anything to do with this. What are you even testing here?

shauna@goldengateblond.bsky.social

this is fucking appalling. i already knew james dolan (who owns the knicks and madison square garden) was a douche but this is next-level. www.nytimes.com/athletic/771...

Eleanor Saitta reposted

again: if you watch the new harry potter, I will think less of you. Not telling you that you can't, just telling you that I will think less of you.

Katelyn Burns@katelynburns.com

Your Harry Potter dollars funded this.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

'Are EU Kidding Me?', my critique of the EU KIDS Act, the EC's chaotic social media ban, is now forthcoming in the excellent Georgetown Law Technology Review. It's updated w/ some extra bits here files.michae.lv/papers/veale... (You can also respond to the consultation: ec.europa.eu/info/law/bet...)

michael veale@michae.lv

The proposed social media ban, the EU KIDS Act, is perhaps the most chaotic law I have ever read! New paper: Are EU Kidding Me? Notes from a Poorly Drafted Social Media Ban. files.michae.lv/papers/veale_areEUkiddingme.pdf In the spirit of the proposal I have stayed offline and read no takes.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

"Men read less than women, this must be because—" You awake in your bed, bolt upright. It is 1972 and you are Bob Metcalfe. Ethernet must never be allowed to happen.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

1) Putin doesn't have diesel to spare. 2) Diesel is cover for lifting sanctions. 3) Putin's statement sounds like he's offering an Iran escape hatch, which I've been predicting. 4) Half of the MASSIVE bribes Putin is offering now don't exist. 5) But he does mention security coop -- Kash.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

To put this in perspective chestnut trees used to be dominant species in the United States. Billions of trees were killed by fungal blight and now fully grown America chestnuts are functionally extinct. There is no getting them back. Ever. All for a data center. www.gadgetreview.com/one-of-ameri...

gadgetreview.comOne of America’s Last Chestnut Groves Is About to Be Destroyed for a Data CenterA rare 200-tree American chestnut grove in West Virginia may be cleared for data-center development, but the project denies the site is on its land.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Replying to @peternimmo.bsky.social

I'd put all translation tasks involving natural languages into the category of "theoretically impossible, but humans do it anyway because we have to". This is a philosophically annoying but very useful category.

Eleanor Saitta reposted

Replying to @sapphixy.bsky.social

software architect works in concert with the software engineers in the same way an architect works with structural and materials engineers the way tech startups have evolved is a bit like if the construction industry had been taken over by DIY YouTubers whose primary goal is views & sponsorships

Eleanor Saitta reposted

This!! Also and I say this because I come from a broadly "security" rather than "safety" space - systems that do not function within specifications are not rationalisable to the democratic public.

Paul Bort@paulbort.bsky.social

Engineering (to me) is "design within constraints". Human safety, budget, time, hardware limitations are all constraints. Dudebros don't like being constrained, it's too much like consideration for others. They write code instead of engineering software.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

View full thread

Interestingly, this metric — understanding two layers in depth and a couple more more generally — is the same one the US Army uses when talking about understanding the context of orders as part of the leadership process — understanding the commander's intent two levels up from you.

In retrospect, it surprises me that we don't talk about this in engineering organizations more often, or even in business more generally. How many people understand their grandboss's goals? Or, for engineers with design as the layer above and product as the layer above that?

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

Helpfully, we also take this approach in all fields of human endeavor, including politics. It's mostly just engineers who are taught that abstractions are concretely real things that the world would comply with, which is why engineers are so much more likely to become terrorists.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

Abstractions are fine as long as you never forget they're a lie and you know how to think across multiple layers. At a minimum, you need a good understanding two layers below and above your work and enough knowledge to know the territory and where to start debugging four layers down.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

A security vulnerability can breach any number of those — Spectre did nine. Ten, thankfully, is rare, but ask Iran (or anyone working in OT security) about halt-and-catch-fire bugs.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

The average web app has a minimum of ten abstraction layers — digital logic, CPU-level logic, CPU microcode, BIOS hardware abstractions, OS kernel, userland, virtualization/containerization, cloud hosting abstractions, CDN and network layer abstractions, and actual application logic.

Abstraction is the original sin of technology. It's essential to do anything and we have taught two generations to treat abstractions as real, but not what's beneath the ones they use nor the implications of this lie, and we wonder why no one can see the impact the lie has on their work and world.

Today was adventures in project management. We're starting the planning and prep process for next year's dyke march. Trying YouTrack for this year, so I got that configured, added the team, and made the first hundred tickets, transcribing last year's lists plus various stuff from our after action.

I'll write a bit at some point about what we're doing and why (hopefully this year) a thousand people taking a two hour walk is probably going to end up with almost as many to-do list items as attendees.

I just finished James C. Scott's last book, In Praise of Floods. It's a delightful, gentle book. I first read his Seeing Like a State something like fifteen years ago, and the way he sees the world has been a constant companion in my head and has shaped my thinking ever since.