Post

Seeing this take a lot in last couple hours but when exactly was this most feasible? IMHO any labor action taken in last 30 years leads to workers immediately being replaced by scabs and the action failing. Any sort of labor actions probs have lead to more firing than we realize, & I would argue...

5 of the 6 presidential adminis and most state gov'ts have been unfriendly to unions and labor power generally. Seems like little has changed and there will be little hope of forming solidarity in such a labor unconcious era where most think they're 1 career move away from being the boss

Maybe I haven't read enough theory or I'm too doomer but I'd love to be enlightened and given revolutionary optimism but things seem bleak for "software developer unions"

if you wanted the most leverage; some time between 2020 & 2022 we had by far the most leverage as labor in this industry. honestly though collective action could have been effective with a hostile admin any time from 2015 - 2022 (excluding the first 6-ish months of COVID?)

By the 2016 it was probably too late IMO, India had more than enough workers to scab by then. I'm thinking the answer is closer to 2012-2015 but even then it's dismal

Singularity's Bounty e/CC@catblanketflower.yuwakisa.com

Esp now with remote work The owners would just move up their plan to offshore the shop by 5 years

i think the biggest barrier isn’t actually any external force like evil DOJ or nega-NLRB, but the tendency for the software industry (and its financiers) to struggle with cooperative business models. a lot of software engineers are very liberal and also think CEO is a job that makes sense to exist.

the truth is that it’s always going to be too late. the secret is that you can join the struggle anytime.

Why would shareholders unionise? Big tech comp is 1) K-shaped and 2) mostly made up of stock Your incentives are to align with capital, not labour.

That 15-20% was probably the most mobile part of the software workforce, so they had an outsized impact on industry-wide unionisation drives.

there's a hard(ish) ceiling on the people with pre-vibecode understanding, so if that's worth anything, it's worth more now, and even more if sold by a monopsony.

I think the age-old beef between academics/pure scientists and engineers/applied scientists/tradesmen definitely played a big part, but Im not convinced unionization would've happened without it

I don't know how software unions would work given how much development work is done on a volunteer basis in the open source hobbyist world.

ave@ave.zone

My previous startup tried to unionize a few years back. The tech half of the company was very strongly in favor, and business (sales, marketing, customer relations, etc) half was very strongly against. Didn't end up happening šŸ™ƒ

I've had this thought on a number of occasions for the past decade, but I don't know that there was a "could" because of the coordination problem. Why would you try to unionize when you're well paid and working conditions are good?

"The good times ain't gonna last" doesn't get enough people off their asses when the times are in fact good. Not to mention how so many software people are temporarily embarrassed billionaires.

Painkillers vs vitamins. And the temporarily embarrassment might even have been a GOAL (not a side effect) of all the entrepreneurship theater we refer to as "YCombi"-style "venture capital" business modeling. Deluding the yeomen is one hell of an accelerant if feudalism is where you're headed

- i am regretting it a lot - at no point in my life have i had the opportunity to do so (including "organizing a union myself") so it's uh. a very specific flavor of regret