Post

I see autistic masking discourse going around again. Neurotypical social norms *are* understandable. Acting neurotypical is doable if high effort (my mom is like this). You can get a long way by being a kind of weird that doesn't rub people the wrong way, which is much easier. But it hinges on this:

5 reposts102 likes

Neurotypical social norms are not actually mostly arbitrary bullshit! The specific mechanics can be silly for the same reason the vagus nerve is silly, evolution over time, but they're mostly active "I am mindful that you are another person with feelings and I am not treading on them" signalling.

With that as your lens, think about norms like leading with praise if you have bad news, asking how they're doing, giving a white lie answer to that question, even eye contact. And if you can't hit all the notes perfectly, you can at least be or act *sincere* in your caring.

Good actors don't perform by mimicking facial expressions blindly, they generally think of something that brings up the right emotions for the character and scene and then that shows through. I find ways to be curious about people, and to care about them as people, at least a bit.

This is interesting because you’re saying that neurotypical behavior can be consciously learned. What’s funny is that I’ve had to learn all the same things, in fact everyone has to. So in your view does autism just make these behaviors less intuitive?

As someone who has a job that requires masking 4-5 hours a day and sometimes more, let me tell you that life can get fucking exhausting and the burnout is brutal.

Gosh I am so grateful to hear you say this aloud because this is critical to why social norms exist in any society. Neurotypicals adapt to them more easily but they exist for society as a whole.

I will say that I think the common expression of some of them by neurotypical people can be really uncomfortable if you're not. Like getting let down easily mostly just hurts more bc of the anticipation for me! And things like that. You need to adjust to the person. But the principle is the same.

I once found an old book of etiquette and I was like, wait this actually sounds like a guide book for non-typcials... the whole thing was just telling you what to do with your hands and little scripts for different situations.

Yep, and the scripts help, but you gotta understand and feel the intent or you end up in the uncanny valley of social performance.

Totally! And I guess that was why the book was wild, because it actually tried to explain the function of those norms, instead of "thats just the way it is". Which for me if I understand the 'why' its easier (or sometimes necessary?) to get the what and how.

In about a month I expect to be very late-diagnosed. "People" is one of my special interests, which was either forced upon me by masking or just made masking easier

i was unaware it was going around but i guess i’ll just say, like, yes, you can do this and also doing this can break you irreparably in meaningful but specific senses and that really needs consideration especially bcz typically after ur broken ppl will not do much to help u get back to stable

Yeah which is a big part of why I do something that isn't "play a normal neurotypical person 100% of the time" and my partner in particular is one of the people I do not perform around as a rule. If I had to, we would not be compatible.

I figured out a sustainable thing that fails relatively gracefully if I can't keep it up. It doesn't set expectations too high in terms of conventional social performance and it contextualizes the times I don't or can't follow them better.

Do you consider “use social signaling in a way that’s comfortable to be but also meshes well with others as a learnable skill” to be or not be masking, or is the question wrong

My spicy take was that some unmasking discourse is actually just advocating cultural or interpersonal insensitivity and that it's expensive for me to mask but that I should really be weighing that against what other ppl need.