Post

Also he doesn't believe in cis-martian space, so he literally can't go to Mars. Just wait until he learns about cis-lunar space. He's going to end up staying here.

yeah it's frustrating because Ars has a lot of really good tech writers generally. they'll even write articles on Musk that are far more realistic and level headed.

Ars is generally good, but yes. At least there's entertainment value in the way he phrases things to downplay the fact Musk is a white supremacist zealot running a long financial con on the back of people who like rocket ships

Stephen Clark is there too and so far hasn’t succumbed to the same way of thinking, but he rarely gets a look in with SpaceX stories.

sure musk may have suddenly and inexplicably devolved from the world's greatest human being into a controversial vaporware-peddling zealot, but one thing has clearly remained: his good faith dedication to humanity!

wait until Eric finds out that neither Mars nor the Moon is ever being settled by Elon Musk and this is all a stock-fluffing lie largely designed to prop up financial fraud! his brow will most assuredly be furrowed!

Eric's coping is disappointing too, because he would rather do the mental gymnastics to make Elon a great guy instead of admitting he's a con-artist Carnie who lied his way into suits. Same level of ride safety, drug use, and unsafe to leave kids around.

Trump's con makes more sense than Elon's. Trump has some weird charisma that makes him likable for some reason. Elon is borderline repulsive in almost every way. How did people ever buy his bs let alone still in 2026?

Musk has failed to produce anything new in years with the exception of the Cybertruck which is a disaster. He keeps having a new fantasy which will be the next great thing but they never happen. His latest is robots.

Everyone for the last 70 years *at least* has understood that to do anything significant and repeatable in our solar system requires a moon base. When Musk started talking about Mars, everyone pointed this out to him, but he and his fans considered him smarter than all those people.

When you think about all the wealth Musk has misallocated - away from established valid institutions towards himself and his various ideas that don't pan out - Musk's net contribution starts to look like a terrible setback to Western esp US civilization.

the Moon is protected by International Treaty, like Antarctica (no one can go up there and 'claim' it-- well, at least in theory). Mars, as far as I know, does not. Ii've often wondered if THAT is why Musk wanted to go straight to Mars. He wants to go there and declare himself Emperor or something

He was always a con man. He never designed or built anything - except the design of the cyber truck. His products were always hyped for more than they were - idiots believed because he had money - just as idiots believed Trump.

SpaceX has a bunch of genuinely great products like Falcon rocket and Starlink. But Starship so far is a disaster. A lot of money wasted. The article claims 100t capacity while Starship barely delivered any cargo to orbit. It probably needs another decade of development.

Neither Falcon nor Starlink are "great" though. Falcon is becoming increasingly sloppy and Starlink is a money pit for the company despite its revenue, which isn't great when you have another self inflicted money pit (Starship).

It is increasingly hard to be a Musk fluffer. For those high on bullshit promises of off world colonies, the comedown is always harsh. They have to struggle with not only being lied to, but the fact that the rest of us saw through flimflam so much earlier.

Let’s see the French arrest him for CSAM on the moon! Brilliant! Line go up! What a visionary! bsky.app/profile/tibo...

Tibor Tiger@tibortiger.bsky.social

The French raiding space Karen’s HQ explains a bunch. Billionaires want to go to space so they can above the law, not just figuratively. Grok will be moving CSAM to a cube satellite mesh network, each cube making a swatch of the final monstrosity. Moonbase KiddyPhucker was the objective all along.

Sunk cost fallacy is a hell of a drug. Nothing hurts worse than having to acknowledge the man you lionized is a dullard who fooled you and that you wasted your life. That day Musk shits his pants on stage and belts out "it's satire!' will be ugly for a lot of folks.

«But the reality is that the Moon has reliable stores of oxygen and silicon» Also aluminium, but that's an interesting use of the word reliable. It's 100% true they're there, they're just literally rocks

Moon City would be great as part of the Network State though. Don't even have to buy off the local sovereign (eg Honduras) to create a totally unregulated crypto community. Moonsteading!

"for all of Blue Origin’s promise with a slimmed down lunar lander, Starship offers a promising avenue to return humans to the Moon in the near term." still hitting all the right Fanboy Notes...🤷‍♂️

My favorite comment on that article (which by the way, the comments section is pretty much wall-to-wall “Erik, you fatuous fool” type commentary):

I read a comment about Spacex going public. Now this makes the xai deal make even more sense. Sell dreams of moon cities AND incredible AI to a bunch of investors and rake in cash.

"We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard...." -- JFK "We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because my other con is a failure...." -- Elon

Eric Berger (Journalist?) is trying for a job with Guardian ffs Raniere's organization, NXIVM was more like a cult. Raniere was known as "Vanguard" and revered as "the smartest man in the world" among followers, but was actually a creepy con man who barely got passing grades in college. Musk to a T

This would seem to be the correct answer. Bezos has finally managed to get Blue Origin moving with some alacrity and this has influenced EM to pivot away from his initial Mars 1st advocacy.

Iirc there was starship, the lunar gateway, and the lander that were all supposed to be built by SpaceX for Artemis. I don’t know how much of that plan has since changed… but I don’t think space x is going to successfully build any of this.

SpaceX was only ever building HLS & Starship. Gateway was a bone thrown to our EU friends for a lunar station, which is increasingly looking useless 25% the size of the lunar lander). And it's important to remember BO's design requires climbing a ladder in a space suit to get in or out.

I’m more of the opinion that a mix of government dysfunction and the fact that the most vital contractor is well, spacex that its going to just not happen for a variety of reasons related to those two things.