Post

You can read more about it if you want but I can’t recommend it.

Elon musk likes child porn, so his lie machine does too.

They need to be fired.

The Bot cannot fix itself. This is basic. It is a fancy chatbot. It isn’t a self-repairing Artificial Intelligence.

A bot can't fix it's own shortcomings. It can't apologize. It's not a person. It's owners can and should be held accountable for allowing child porn on their device, however. That should be the focus.

Can we stop treating this like a "whoopsy doodle."

Contact your Senators

100%. We really are on the dumbest timeline bsky.app/profile/epin...

This is actually different from that And My entire profile is about exposing elon on what he has been doing bsky.app/profile/wher...

Hoi @volkskrant.nl @nieuws.nos.nl @nieuwsuur.nl @rtl.nl @nrc.nl

My slinky has decided to go down the stairs. Never mind what pushed it forward. It is now governed by its own free will of continuing to go down the stairs.

Twitter let their AI chatbot post child pornography because Twitter is run by pedophiles, and are now covering their asses because of bad press. there's your headline. fuck off

Fixing lapses that no other AI prompts have in the first place because those were built with those safeguards? Put. Musk. In. Jail. Stop covering for his irresponsibility and pedophilia.

You dumb fuckers

Once again: THE COMPUTER IS NOT ALIVE. The computer has no agency. How is this not getting through to you people?

Good lord. Grok isn't fixing anything. Grok is a program. If I were changing the oil in my car would you report that my car was changing its oil?

Sounds like you're running cover for the largest CSAM distribution ring in human history

Grok’s just a LLM!! Grok’s not alive!! youtu.be/q7bi8UywGFI?...

Y'all are lying sacks of disingenuous trash. Grok can't 'do' anything. It's an algorithm. The developers behind their revenge porn, CSAM generator got caught allowing it to do what it has been used for over and over for the last two years. You're pathetic.

People are rewriting the programming. The AI bot isn't fixing itself.

I'd like to know how to report this false story shielding child porn distributors to CNBC. Email Customer Care: Send details to customercare@cnbc.com, specifying the article, show, anchor, or product involved.

The two tier legal system showing its ass again. We live in a plutocracy where the rich are treated like royalty and never see jail time

>a grok reply to one user stated that it was "taking a long nap" after the holiday period and called salmon an "overrated" fish. it generates text in response to prompts. if the prompt suggests a response should include claims of action on its part, it'll generate them. that's it.

The framing here is pure fantasy. Grok is an LLM, it can't fix anything, it has no agency.

I'm sure taking their word for it is a great idea and the pinnacle of journalistic integrity.

this is like saying my toaster oven made the bed for me, but more pathetic

🤦‍♂️🏆

*Lord Farquaad voice* The reporter believes the chatbot is real!

Hello, just want to make sure that whomever is on the other end of this account understands that Grok is not a person, is not conscious, doesn't make decisions with any level of awareness, and is just a really complicated Furby.

It has been told to do a beater job of hiding it. That’s all

Could CNBC maybe give its writers a quick primer on what LLMs like Grok are and how they work? It doesn't matter one bit what Grok "says" is happening. It has no idea of what xAI is doing. It's an algorithm that generates output on the basis of "What would a human response to this query sound like?"

CNBC isn't putting out this bullshit, a person is responsible. Do better.

They do realize it was the people using the A.I, yes I don't like A.I generators but shifting all the blame to a algorithm based program is stupid. Note "algorithm"!

Twitter is a Child Sex Abuse Materials site.

This is a human crime.

Author is a user of Twitter, clear conflict of interest

Who is fixing what? As long as they are allowing people to prompt their AI to take clothing off a person in a photo, it will continue, because there are thousands of photos of children on that site. The fix is for them to stop allowing people to edit photos that innocent people posted on that site

No it's not! That's factually not true! The model just generated some text that claimed that, which is not a statement of fact! Delete your account then your whole website!

No it’s not. This is a lie.

Ah well problem solved then. Text apologies are always real and can't be lies

The things you should do to yourselves are terms of service violations to describe.

Now, you can only post nude pictures of old men.

Put to market before this *obvious* use wasn’t ironed out? What will this idiot have to do to before the majority of the world realise how dangerous he is to society and humanity?

You mean Musk is trying to fix his error.

Are the safeguard lapses in the room with you right now?

NO IT IS NOT. Grok is not a sentient being. Stop doing PR for the company that makes the environment-destroying, plagiarism-fueled child porn machine.

Musk is a pedophile.

Grok is not fixing anything, it is not an engineer, it is not a person, it does not have any agency of its own. Please stop with this parroting of nonsense from tech bros.

Hey um, Grok isn’t doing shit, it’s a computer program. Musk is paying his engineers to try to fix this problem after Musk had his engineers create a CSAM generator. Humans are responsible and need to beheld responsible.

Grok is not “fixing it‘s safeguards. The software engineers who work on It are fixing it. What is more concerning is that Musk sees it more as a joke and I suspect we will continue to see people use Grok in this manner.

Not to mention the fact that he openly stated his intent to make his LLM and GenAI tools without safeguards and restrictions. Seems like that demonstrates intent in the case of any incoming lawsuit.

that's why I left twitter in the first place

Exactly this.

And predilections.

Live in a blue state? Contact your State AG, report a violation of state CSAM law. By who, they'll ask. And you say Elon Musk. Offer to send them a copy of the WRITTEN CONFESSION given via GROK of this violation. Request they subpoena X for the names of accounts that requested CSAM from Grok.

Because they’re on Team Trump. Ie Team Child Rapist. As is Musk. .

oh yeah that dumb looker guy

elon is trying to help trump distract from the murder cover-up of a csam merchant with csam of his own 🧐 bsky.app/profile/t0us...

Is it though? Is it?

GROK ISN’T REAL. It’s not a person. It has no self. *It* cannot “fix” anything.

And how is "it" doing that, exactly?

Yoooo reprint this with the proper headline: "billionaire connected to Ghislaine Maxwell and his company desperately scramble to cover up their robot spewing out CP." It was DESIGNED TO DO THIS BY HUMAN PEOPLE! It didnt just decide to do this, someone programmed this.

GROK IS NOT DOING ANYTHING

It. Is. Not. A. Person. It cannot speak. It cannot act. It cannot think or know. It cannot fix anything, it cannot conceptualise a 'lapse', and it does not know what a child is. By pretending otherwise you are endangering children further by covering for the perpetrators.

a digital yes-man that repeats whatever you ask it to is not fixing shit

www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bot

Correct headline: "Musk's xAI is trying to play down the pedophilia bot scandal".

No it's not. What's an embarrassingly lickspittle headline. How about, "Nazi makes pedo machine. Media still kisses his ass"?

BS, he encourages this crap

Creating child pornography is not a "lapse", Elon Musk should be charged as a sex offender.

Musk is doing these things. It is his company, his engineers built it and programmed it to do these things and he is letting it do them. HE is the problem here. Do your job and report the facts.

the purpose of a system is what it does

Grok isn't a person. It can't fix itself.

The USA's entire history is nonstop exploitation while shouting "we're free".

it neither has the inclination or the capability to fix itself

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain! People control this technology and are responsible for releasing it without safeguards in place. They need to be held accountable. This shit isn’t magic. And even so the wizard behind it is responsible.

The bot sure isn't doing this, Jesus fuck I could put googly eyes on a piece of toast and journalists too credulous not to stop breathing if told them to would all think it was a living breathing piece of toast.

No, it isn't. It's like saying my calculator is fixing holes in my budget.

WHO is fixing these lapses?

good of you to report the press release and ask no further questions

how is this allowed to still function? if anyone else “accidentally” created child porn publicly, they’d already be in jail

Oh. The bot is fixing itself? You realize that’s the dumbest possible thing you could claim right?

The story hear is that Elon Musk thinks Grok’s behavior is fine. Elon may be a pedophile.

Did it also write your garbage headline?

I see you've fixed your article's headline but you should delete this and try again

And it did this all by itself, did it? Not a human hand in sight. Amazing how you just act like this thing has a mind of its own.

Up to their necks in this shit.

And she's an idiot if she believes this horse crap.

We all know these are intentional.

fuck off, and when you've done that, fuck off again.

Grok is a computer program. It only executes instructions. Humans allowed lapses in safeguards and humans will have to fix this. Humans are responsible. Focus on them.

Neat, what about those who programmed Grok?

Grok is not a person so cannot fix anything. What kind of journalism do you practice anyway?

Cnbc is white washing pedo musk

A bit cannot fix anything. What Musk did was facilitate the distribution of CSAM. It’s not difficult or nuanced. Also, bots can’t apologize. These are criminals and should be treated as such.

when are you going to report with the proof that they "fixed" it? or - when it inevitably happens again because X is an amoral company and won't change anything unless they are held accountable - will you just write the same headline again the next time it happens?

They should just get rid of Grok altogether. Nobody likes this shit.

Grok produced CSAM on demand. And now Grok is producing apologies on demand, and "fixing itself" on demand, and when are people going to grasp that this is just a fiction generating machine with no intelligence and no volition, producing what sex predators want to see?

There is no excuse this long into this tech being on the scene and being so important to the US economy to still be so irresponsible in your reporting about it. Where are your tech journalists? Why can't they actually report how these chatbots work?

Kinds of seem like the real story is the owner of the platform defiantly defending his revenge porn machine and mocking exploited children. But a story about how you were conned into believing that a “AI Bot” could fix anything, let alone behavior hard coded into it, might be interesting too…

Same to you, Manny.

Hmm, "man makes new type of child pornography, yet we let him off the hook becuase he is filthy rich." Would have been a better headline.

Grok is not real...the people behind it are pedophiles and pervs. Stop pretending its a real boy.

The post from Grok is functionally the same as the CSAM from Grok; a response generated to satisfy a user request. xAI has NOT made any statement addressing this, and pretending a random post from their sentence-generating machine counts as an official communication is journalistic malpractice.

“In the fascinating new reality of the internet, teen girls can’t learn about periods on Reddit and indie artists can’t sell smutty games on Itch, but a military contractor will make you nonconsensual deepfakes of Taylor Swift taking her top off for $30 a month.” www.theverge.com/internet-cen...

lol, no it’s not! stop lying. also if a person did this you wouldn’t call it a “lapse” - not even in scare quotes

Pedophile Musk builds child porn machine - the actual headline.

How does this kind of fallacy get by even the laziest editor at CNBC?

So Musk produced child porn. And you're blaming it on a machine? Delete your account.

So “human computer programmers and engineers” can’t turn it off?

And the statement is a meaningless anthropomorphization coming from Grok, anyway.