Post

an unhappy Mike Johnson growls when informed in real time by a reporter that the Supreme Court ruled to uphold birthright citizenship

386 reposts1.6K likes

To be clear, I don’t think birthright citizenship is being “abused”. I was only commenting on the spurious nature of his reasoning. If applied to other rights, it leads to vastly different outcomes than his party proposes.

I really do not get what part of “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” these government officials do not understand, including SCOTUS.

Give up Mike, you are finished. The decisions on election ballots and now birthright citizenship were upheld by the Supreme Court you and the so-called republican party, in name only, have nothing left to cry about.

Hey Mike, everything that goes the opposite from what you wanted. It’s to be grossly upsetting or grossly abused. So question for you Michael, do you believe that the founding fathers would be OK with children being shot and killed and mutilated in school by automatic weapons?

wanted.towanted.to

Do these dumbasses realize THEY are Americans today because their great / grandparents or earlier benefited from birthright citizenship? THEIR ancestors arrived in USA without any formal immigration process - because it did not exist - and as result their lineage are US citizens b/c of the 14th A?

Yeah, now he’s complaining about textualist & originalist views? 🤦‍♀️ Of course birthright citizenship was established in 1868 … so not quite the founding fathers. 🤷‍♀️

BREAKING: The Supreme Court holds that the Fourteenth Amendment protects birthright citizenship, blocking Donald Trump's executive order to end it. The "REAL BREAKING" is they got 4 Supreme Court Justices to say the 14th Amendment does not say what it CLEARLY says!

The reporter labels him & he forwards “Constitutional” lawyer! 🤬 Marriage isn’t mentioned in the Constitution. His Pressler school failed, so he’s not taught it. His arguments have all centered around spending our tax money for his Christian viewpoints. I’d say he is an “UnConstituional” lawyer.

Look. This might make me a bad person. But when Mike Johnson is unhappy, I get happier. Not a lot. Just enough that when on a random Wednesday afternoon I suddenly feel a little better about this dystopian hellscape, I’ll smile knowing this dude just got some bad news

"You could say that is what the Constitution says, but it's been abused." Just use the slurs, Mikey. You know it's only a matter of time anyway, just embrace it now. Last I checked, the Constitution doesn't have a "we don't like it" clause to ignore individual Amendments. At least, not yet.

I wonder what other parts of the Constitution self-described “Constitutional Scholar” Johnson believes should be judicially altered from their plain-text due to “being grossly abused.” People have claimed the 2nd Amendment has been “grossly abused.” Or the 4th Amendment? The 1st?

Is it real time, Lisa? Catch you off guard? Wasn't prepared that little knowledge? Gotta regroup, Lisa? (ps: I cannot STAND tiny Lisa McClain who is constantly shielding her bigotry behind her clasped hands in front of her cooch...oh, sorry, forgot she suffers from vaginal itch.)

Mike is scared, terrified. ALL THEIR TRICKS ARE FALLING APART IN COURTS OF LAW. JUDGES ACROSS THE COUNTRY, INCLUDING THE SUPREME COURT ARE REFUSING TO ALLOW REPUBLICANS TO THROW OUT LEGAL VALID VOTES TO CHEAT IN THIS ELECTION IN NOVEMBER 2026. Save their ass act is dead

it’s almost as if Reichsleiter Speaker Mike Johnson were a 1%er. oh, right. he hails from the top 1% of least literate and most poorly educated people in the Western world. in fact, One could say Herr Johnson is the 1% of the 1%, Shreveport ranking at the bottom of Louisiana’s education system.

Too bad for that little pedophile protector, twat who lives in a tree stump Also, isn’t it amazing how they never talk about the amount of Russians who Trump help facilitate come to the United States to give birth?

That was way too close. It should have been 7-2 at most, not 5-4. I'd love to see a law that if a scotus rules in violation of the constitution, judged by a panel of Constitutional scholars, they lose their seat.

"textualism originalist view" per Johnson, on birthright, yet the justices who claim to be that are the ones who dissented, once again showing this self-categorizing by those 3 justices has always been utterly bullsh*t. They decide issues from a position of their religious view & foxnews saturation

(Obviously not the whole thing, just the meat, just Mike Johnson receiving the news and his immediate reaction. Four seconds. Have some media savvy here, guys.)

Fuck the: Racist Supreme Court, the Racist president, the Racist Republican party, the Racist lords of dark money, and All the motherfuckers who are too racist to notice or care

rethuglykkans = liars, criminals, terrorists Call them out each and every time. Agitate to have all members of the rethuglikkkan party identified as a part of a criminal organisation that steals from the public trust while spreading lies, and instigating and supporting terrorism.

Textualist and Originalist view…isn’t that supposed to be what Conservatives advocate for? At least Scalia did. Speaker, you are a fraudulent sycophant to a President who has no training in law, constitutional or otherwise. Please resign your bar membership.

“Stephen will be so disappointed as we all are.” “Making America White Again, will require so many more camps, taking away land from data centers”