Will Oremus

Will Oremus

@willoremus.com

Covering online speech, the information economy and AI weirdness at @theatlantic.com. Shitposting about Bluesky on Bluesky. Signal: willoremus.24

78.7K followers2.6K following5.3K posts

help, there's a baseball world series going on and i don't actively hate either team. who am i supposed to root against here??

Bluesky's "suggested for you" tool is a great example of my favorite type of AI recommender algorithm: hilariously incompetent and delightfully inscrutable

Will Oremus reposted

i'm not going to read this article but i really admire the craft

Vulture@vulture.com

‘Wicker’ stars Alexander Skarsgård as a man made entirely of wicker, complete with a rock-hard wicker dick. But what about splinters? Bacteria? Degradation? Would it be advisable, from a sexual-health perspective, to mount a basket dick? We asked a gynecologist: vulture.visitlink.me/DNQwX5

View full thread

A network of 37 sites with names like the Wolverine State Report and Kalamazoo Beacon appeared overnight in September. Filled with Q&As seeding positive messages about state and local candidates, the sites were soon getting cited in answers by Google and ChatGPT. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...

It’s wild all the ways people talked themselves into thinking this 76ers team wouldn’t be that good. They have the best players, they’re probably going to be a pretty good team!

Philadelphia 76ers@sixersnba.bsky.social

FIRST W OF THE SEASON.

“But how will they share the ball???” Have people never watched any of these men play before? They are all natural passers, especially Lebron and Joel.

Will Oremus reposted

what kills me about AI is that the people making it always talk about these high-minded uses that would supposedly benefit the world, but in the real world it's always used for the most manipulative and disgusting slop you can possibly imagine futurism.com/artificial-i...

futurism.comGLP-1 Apps are Using Sobbing AI-Generated Women To Market Their ProductsApps including GLP-1 trackers, AI companions, and "wellness" services are being marketed on TikTok via synthetic images of sobbing AI women.

i’m not one to care about celebrity product endorsements but this one was surprisingly meaningful to my bball-loving, lactose-intolerant 11yo. he had never really considered that there could be a real upside to his inability to enjoy ice cream, mac and cheese, pizza and other stuff his friends love

good thread by someone smarter than me explaining that AI interpretability explainer:

Colin@colin-fraser.net

ok having read it, let me try. Background knowledge: a neural network, conceptually, has billions of little things called neurons. One goal of so-called "interpretability" would be to be able to look at each neuron and say what it does for the network.

“Revealed preferences” is a useful concept in some settings but it gets used to justify exploitive practices that people are forced to put up with because they lack good alternatives

Max Read@maxread.info

strongly believe these kinds of findings should be weighed heavily against the "revealed preferences" that govern all kinds of institutional/market/software/culture design!

seeing how many clicks a story is getting in real time can be useful at the level of the individual story. but on aggregate, everyone making their headlines ~clickier~ probably doesn't mean more people reading the news. it just raises the bar for how sensational a headline has to be to get noticed.

Charlie Warzel@cwarzel.bsky.social

genuinely think that chartbeat and real-time audience traffic insight dashboards are one of the worst things to happen to the media industry. it found out what people read and wanted and public trust has pretty much only sharply declined since then

Will Oremus reposted

a common response to ”you should probably learn how ai works before making incorrect claims about it. you could use it, or talk to people who do” is “oh, so i should have to do heroin to talk about how it’s dangerous?” and well. drug users do have unique insights about what drug use is like actually

Will Oremus reposted

In our course and book _Calling Bullshit_, we posit that If something seems too good, or too bad, to be true, it probably is. Now as a college professor I'm pretty confident that overreliance can AI can harm our thinking ability, but just ten minutes of use? Let's dig into this this study a bit.

news.berkeley.eduUsing AI for just 10 minutes erodes your ability to persist at hard things - Berkeley NewsA UC Berkeley researcher co-authored a study that raises profound questions about how we interact with artificial intelligence in education — and daily life.

“It seems that arts communities’ revulsion toward AI has fostered a self-defeating underinvestment in understanding how exactly it functions, and how those who are repelled by AI companies’ presence in cultural spheres might beat back its encroachment.”

Vauhini Vara@vauhinivara.bsky.social

I wrote about how the winner of another major literary prize appears to be AI and why we need to do something about all this. 😢

Will Oremus reposted

Anthropic banning “abusive or cruel behavior” toward Claude in its new usage policies is proof to me that tech companies are going to moderate violence against AI before they ever moderate violence against women and minorities

lol i got nuclear-blocked for pointing out that a viral bluesky post about AI data centers was based on a linked article that was itself AI slop

The idea that there's something ironic or hypocritical about using Pangram to detect AI slop hinges on the common conflation of two different technologies (a classifier and an LLM) under the banner of AI. If that's ironic, then using a social network to criticize AI is ironic too. (It isn't.)

There are critiques of Pangram that I think are reasonable and valid, tbc. (For instance, that it gives a sense of false precision and doesn't convey uncertainty well imo.) "Look at this hypocrite using AI to detect AI" just isn't one of them.

a bit undersized but she can't be any worse than jurgens. let's plug her in at left guard

Stephen Gutowski@stephengutowski.bsky.social

This thumbnail makes it seem like the Eagles are bringing in @minakimes.bsky.social to shore up the offensive line. Bold move, if so.

Out of curiosity I actually tried asking an AI's advice for my fantasy football team. Quite frankly Claude sucks at fantasy football

Lane Johnson does not seem to be a perfect dude by any means. But then, none of us is. Retiring midseason because his family and mental health are more important than football should only cement his legacy. If more male pro athletes were this open about mental health, they'd be better role models.

Fun fact: Tesla went with a giant touchscreen instead of knobs for the Model 3 purely to save time and money. Knobs would have required spinning up a whole supply chain. The company spun it as a luxury feature and much of the industry followed suit. But it was always an inferior substitute.

Steve Mullis@stevemullis.net

[car dealership waiting room] Me: [chanting] knobs, knobs- Other car buyers: knobs, KNOBS Car salesman: [pounding desk] KNOBS, KNOBS, KNOBS!

I meant to say the Model S, which was Tesla’s first mass production vehicle. (This wasn’t an issue with the Roadster, because that was basically just a modded Lotus Elise.) But of course it’s true of the Model 3 as well.

“you’re not an ai influencer” is both an extremely funny attempted putdown for a pope and also just factually incorrect

This post is unavailable.

Will Oremus reposted

Replying to @willoremus.com

As a fan of both you & Emily, I'll just point out something maybe obvious: Searching web, extraction, etc., isn't an LLM. That's engineered code/functions used alongside an LLM; the distinction between an "AI system" and an LLM (I wrote a thing about this here: medium.com/@margarmitch...) 1/

medium.comNo, “AI” is not a Stochastic Parrot 🦜I’ve recently come across a new flavor of AI denialism making the rounds.