Looting is not necessarily a revolutionary goal. It's for the main part the result of capital contradictions. You have poor and segregated people that one day have the opportunity to take items that are over advertised and unaffordable for them. It's understandable that they go for it
"The child who is not embraced by the village will burn it down to feel its warmth".
The system breeds/selected for this type of mentality, so it should expect the consequence of instability, society isolation and opportunistic individuals.
"The bourgeoisie of the whole world, which looks complacently upon the wholesale massacre after the battle, is convulsed by horror at the desecration of brick and mortar!" - Karl Marx
On the decline of third spaces:
"No money means you can’t afford opportunities to socialise.
No socialising means you aren’t exposed to opportunities that lead to networking, business, or support."
It's a vicious cycle the wealthy are immune to.
the idea of a mindless planet-consuming automaton has been around for 200 years and it's called "a corporation" and if we want to really understand AI we should first understand what makes corporations so problematic
You don't start life in the USA with a "neutral opinion" of cops or soldiers, you start with "these guys are heroes fighting for freedom and protecting your family" and forming any other opinion must start with rejecting that learned position (which is a lot harder than forming a fresh opinion).
whether these changes ultimately benefit us or have a destructive effect will in large part be determined by the decisions of the humans in control of this new technology
Well, I mean, there *is* bread but it's like 3x as much as it was a few years ago and if you try to put lettuce on it you'll get diarrhea
And the circuses exist, but they make it pretty clear you're agreeing to a license that just permits viewership in accordance with an EULA, not a real ticket
Plants are kind of odd when you think about it. What's your survival strategy? Oh, I'm going to stand perfectly still, largely defencelessly, growing very slowly, for years. Does that work? Yeah it works incredibly well thanks
the US could easily end nearly all illegal immigration, just about overnight, by simply strengthening and enforcing the already existing laws surrounding the hiring of the undocumented. They wouldn't come here, and they wouldn't stay here, if they were unable to find gainful employment
The fact that the US federal government would rather attempt to manually hunt down ~15 or 20 million undocumented immigrants instead of going after the far smaller number of American businessmen required to put a stop to it tells you everything you need to know about American politics.
you'll never be the richest man in the world because you have a soul.
you're not willing to step on a friend's neck to give yourself another half inch of height.
you're not willing to view your children as backup organs should yours fail.
whenever someone tells you that it's simply impossible for police to be charged with misconduct or criminal charges, you can tell they're wrong because some cops do get charged regularly — when they are whistleblowers or reformers prosecutors are actually extremely eager to help drum them out!
Prosecutors charged an LAPD officer with felony eavesdropping for making secret recordings of his colleagues’ racist, sexist and homophobic comments on the job
Digital Fascism? Techno-Feudalism?
Calling it a completely new mode of production may be too strong, but calling it merely an aesthetic change misses the actual shift. The engine is still capital accumulation; the control surface has changed.
Whether we call that techno-feudalism or digital fascism matters less than recognizing that private infrastructure now performs quasi-governmental functions without democratic accountability.
Additionally, these entities are suprastate and act with no borders.
Digital Fascism? Techno-Feudalism?
Calling it a completely new mode of production may be too strong, but calling it merely an aesthetic change misses the actual shift. The engine is still capital accumulation; the control surface has changed.
Platforms no longer just own products or workplaces. They mediate attention, identity, payment, employment, political visibility and access to social life.
They absorb social dissonance, sort people into profitable behavioural clusters, then sell the ability to steer those clusters back to corporations and states.
The United States is turning into a kind of reverse Omelas: everyone is miserable except for a single child, Donald Trump, who inexplicably must be kept happy.
This is a prime example of why right-wing populism slides so easily into antisemitism. You need a populist framing of "the people" versus "the elites," but you can't frame the elites in strictly economic terms, or else you end up with leftism. Hence you need another way to define "elites."
Miriam Adelson is horrible, but she's horrible because she's a billionaire buying elections. Thomas Massie can't make a principled critique of all billionaires, because that would lead him to leftism, so he has to single out the "Tel Aviv born" ones. He knows exactly what he's doing here.
Not true. In their list of grievances, the Founding Fathers complained that King George III was blocking colonial laws that would promote immigration and make it easier for foreign settlers to become citizens.
Imagine helping defeat the Nazis and being too ignorant to understand the lessons of WW2 about national arrogance, dictator worship, and warmongering.
Apparently the inhumane horrors of WW2 were not enough for some people to get the memo. Imagine being that dense.
i always keep a spreadsheet open. doesn't matter what i'm doing. an easy, infinite two dimensional way to store data. i feel like a cave painter in 30,000 BCE. they'll find my data one day and wonder about all of us. that's why i keep it organized. im making you look good to the future
It seems somewhat bad that the richest man in the world can use his money to bankrupt individuals or organizations -- including officials who are tasked with holding him accountable -- that accurately point out that his actions plausibly facilitated the deaths of millions.
I asked Norman Rockwell's granddaughter, Daisy Rockwell, about this use of her grandfather's work. She writes: "It goes without saying that they have completely misunderstood the meaning of the painting, which is tolerance for others and peaceful coexistence."