It's been pointed out by multiple theologians and philosophers that if this were true the people that made it have done a monstrous thing by immediately enslaving their own conscious creation.
I don’t do copium and I don’t Democratmaxxing. I am a journalist. But I will say this looking at the samples: polling is going to have a big miss and will underestimate Democrats. Pollsters are being skittish and weighting for 2024.
Some LLMs accidentally evolved better math ability. Those were artificially selected because of their benchmark performance (and the rest were killed).
This is the reverse of the creationism vs. evolution debate: people ignore the creation process and claim that it's an innate LLM ability.
For what it’s worth, arguing LLMs can’t do addition now is flat earth-level science denialism. Here’s Gemma 4b, a non-reasoning model that could only theoretically memorize binary operations up to 65535 x 65535, oneshotting a eight digit addition and hex conversion *on my phone* with no tool calls
"Explain how that happens" is a legitimate request! And critique!
I am happy to explain all sorts of ways LLMs could hurt humanity, but all of those explanation involve careless people doing careless things. Not rogue software.
I do not like this moment in time where nobody cares how things work.
As the opposite of a computer toucher, I sometimes worry that I'm not keeping up with the development of things.
Luckily, I'm smart enough to realize that if the "most dangerous" LLMs need warehouses full of GPUs to function, they can't just "break out" and start running on random PCs.
"my LLM is so powerful it's dangerous and risks breaking containment!"
"ok let's destroy it"
"oh, haha, no. no."
"let's intensively regulate your company then"
"oh, no. no. look can you just put it in the newspaper that it's powerful"
So here's a quote from @pablo.show that applies to not only his Clippers investigation but the best of what journalism can be:
www.nytimes.com/athletic/756...
More than 10 million Americans take out a used car loan every year, with an average rate of an insane 11.4%.
We lower those rates by 4 points with our FHA for Car Loans proposal, saving the typical borrower $6,000 over the life of their loan.
I wonder how many people will see this and never know that, so far, at least some of the solutions have been found to build off of and plagiarize existing work without siting it? Everyone always sees the press release but never the debunk that comes later: archive.ph/JCl4g#select...
Some initial thoughts, and a complicated mix of feelings.
Wow. I mean, Erdos problems are cool (I genuinely mean that), I didn't know about the Jacobian conjecture before it got disproved. But this newest batch from OpenAI hits home in a way the previous announcements did not.
Think about it this way: what if your tax dollars were used to buy sophisticated surveillance equipment and guns, and then the cops never killed your dog? Wouldn’t you feel ripped off?
This isn't true, at least not yet. Most generative AI leaves very distinct digital signatures that aren't so hard to spot. That might not be true forever, of course, and things are changing fast ... but I strongly suspect we could tell the difference with relatively early generation image.
In the age of AI, photos are no longer evidence. Beshear needs to be able to speak to him in person or do what dear Mitch would do in these circumstances.
this is what happens when you're "skeptical of woo" in a way where you don't actually know what woo is and how it sustains itself in the world, making your skepticism toothless: a skepticism consisting not of robust analysis of difficult-to-integrate experiences, but of simply not having had any yet
there was a funny period in the genAI bubble (ongoing) where people were really impressed with the architectural differences between the models (layers, weights, etc.)
now people only care about which proprietary (stolen) training set is used
President Obama: "No one is above the law or beneath its protection."
"Our military and law enforcement owe allegiance not to any president or political party, but to the people and our Constitution."
Since I haven't seen a post with all of it screenshotted and alt-texted in one place, here's the Iran MOU as hudson.org Adjunct Fellow Josh Block is reporting it on Twitter.
I'm working on a column about the tech annoyances that drive us crazy, and I want it to be as universal as possible, so tell me yours!
E.g. scanning a QR code to read a menu, never receiving the one-time passcode they supposedly texted you, "verify you're human" by IDing tiny motorcycles, etc.
BREAKING: Judge Waverly Crenshaw dismisses indictment of Kilmar Abrego Garcia based on selective and vindictive prosecution.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
this graduation speech moment is notable, and her amazed shock at having failed to read the room feels instructive.
when you're inside the bubble, you think everybody else is. but everybody isn't.
i want just one (1) tech reporter to ask sam altman this exact question
“if your ai is so advanced, dont you have a fiduciary duty to your company to fire yourself and replace you with your highly advanced model?”
Wanna know what one of the poster children for data center noise sounds like?
Turn sound on to hear Vantage’s VA2 in Sterling, Virginia. Reports indicate the noise is from gas turbines operating on site for off-grid power.