> we decided that the codebase is not a derivative work that would require carrying forward the GPL license and have decided to release the code under the MIT instead. oh someone wants to get sued.
Post
And git probably has contributors with standing to sue who might have the ideological motive to do so. Also, like. How are you not a derived work? What made you come to that conclusion? Or do you just really WANT to not be?
1 repost74 likes
Since people aren't connecting the dots on this I feel like I need to point out that the author of this post is GitButler's CEO and the same Scott Chacon whose name is proudly displayed as a co-author at git-scm.com/book. He was also a Github cofounder.
i was 95% certain that was wrong (and the citation for it on wikipedia is gone) found this — he was one of the first employees. maybe they promoted him later. but to me that's not a cofounder.
there is already a rust port of git anyway lol, it's been around forever github.com/gitoxidelabs...
They really thought they could pull a malus.sh/ Can't exactly call it a clean room reverse engineering effort if it can't be proven the AI model doesn't know about Git