Post

pro tip for AI enthusiasts who want people to stop being mean to them: maybe stop talking about how it's going to take everybody's jobs all the time (and if you really do believe that, then 1. consider how that'll come off to the people whose jobs will be lost and 2. become a UBI stan)

This post is unavailable.

I tell such people that my job involves accepting personal accountability and contractual liability for the things I say being accurate, something that the AI boosters have been notably slow even to acknowledge as a legitimate job function, let alone to claim to be able to replace

"hey Claude, I thought you said this would be HIPAA compliant." "You're right. I said that. I made it up. I take responsibility. Blah blah" "Okay, so you're liable for damages now, right?" "Haha! This service is just for fun. You're still on the hook if you take me seriously."

34 reposts240 likes

Ah yes, the Tesla special. “Check out our awesome new tech it’s basically perfect and you can rely on it entirely [whispers] except we accept no responsibility whatsoever for how you use it, no big deal might as well not even consider how that invalidates our premise that [yells] it’s like a human!”

Hospital auditors turn cancer screening over to AI and fire most of the radiologists to save money. But leave one human radiologist on staff to take responsibility for the AI screenings that fail to detect cancer.

C.V. Danes@cv-danes.com

Human makes mistake: This is a training issue we will address to make sure it won't happen again. Also, humans are dumb. AI makes mistake: Haha it's just hallucinating obviously your expectations are too high Luddite thats the problem. Also, AI is brilliant.

I mean, yes, but also in some fields this is why practitioners are required to carry malpractice insurance and/or their professional regulatory bodies maintain client security funds to compensate malpractice victims. Things that AI developers absolutely don't want to be on the hook for.

It's a time-saver, a game-changer, a replacement for dumb humans until somebody has a civil tort claim or potentially even a criminal complaint, and then it's "this is still under development" and "you should've read the EULA more closely."

It's definitely gonna take real life example cases of consequences for stuff like this to actually get AI people to take that issue seriously

A number of the lawyers who spend half their lives on here seem to think this one is maybe poorly filed (on the company's part) / won't amount to a problem for OpenAI, just this random woman

Yeah, the AI companies' general strategy is to make *vague* general claims about being able to replace doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc., but run far away from such claims in their actual terms. It's not tenable to continue allowing this discrepancy, but allow it we do.