Post

Civilization is absolutely littered with counterexamples to the baldly false idea that social problems cant be solved by technology. The idea that they cannot was popularized by a reactionary advocating for mathusianism and he was talking about food production.

the problem is that technical solutions to a social problem are always going to fail, because they're an artificial obstacle. anyone caught using smart glasses to be a creep should be immediately fired into the sun without so much as a sniff of a second chance.

19 reposts134 likes

I strongly reject the idea that Hardin was an environmentalist! A close reading of his work reveals that he doesn't actually care about the environment, only certain people - those he considers human. Racists and eugenicists will wear any costume that advances their goals - not always a sheet!

Those aren’t the kind of problems this saying is about. Tech can’t solve problems where the crux of the problem is how people interact as part of a group. That’s not all social problems.

How people interact as part of a group is one of the things technology is spectacularly good at changing.

Because you don't have to convince eight billion primates to acquire better personalities. You can alter the environment so different behavior becomes easier, cheaper, safer, more rewarding, or simply automatic.

My counterpoint to this is always that verticality in buildings is not a social problem, and ramps and elevators are a technological solution to access for disables folks who can’t use stairs.

Irrigation changes the consequences of drought. Food storage changes the consequences of seasonal scarcity. Contraception changes reproductive choices. Infrastructure can turn behaviors requiring heroic individual coordination into automatic defaults.

Modern scholarship on techno-fixes actually makes this exact point and cautions against defining technological fixes as inherently fallacious, because some plainly can work.

Technology cannot tell us what society ought to want. Technology can very often make what society wants dramatically easier to achieve.

for what it's worth, I was agreeing with you - my point is that banning smart glasses because it lets creeps be creeps as a side effect is not a good idea.

It’s like “the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.” I suppose you can just say stuff, doesn’t matter if it has any relation to experience or history, so long as it’s a clever turn of phrase

Yeah, Audre Lorde was very specific about which tools, which masters, whose house Ironically, erasing her legacy by appropriating the quote is the kind of tool she was referring to