Thomas Davidson

Thomas Davidson

@thomasdavidson.bsky.social

Sociologist at UNC. I study topics including right-wing politics, populism, and hate speech on social media. I also write about computational methods and AI. https://www.thomasrdavidson.com/

961 followers730 following104 posts

Pinned

New paper in Nature Human Behaviour. I use a conjoint experiment to test multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for context-sensitive content moderation and compare with human subjects. Methodologically, this demonstrates how social science techniques can enhance AI auditing. 💻🤖💬

Over the past couple of weeks Claude found bugs that affected core functionality in two different R packages just through routine use for research and teaching. The first PR was just merged. Less satisfying than discovering these issues myself, but what amazing time for software development!

Thomas Davidson reposted

We have re-opened our search for a 3-year AI-research postdoc at NYU's Center for Social Media, AI, and Politics!! The position starts this **September 1st** (or as soon as possible thereafter) and is in person at NYU. If necessary, we will also consider a 1/1/27 start. 1/3

Thomas Davidson reposted

📢 Call for Reviewers: WOAH @ #EMNLP2026 WOAH is looking for reviewers to help evaluate submissions for our 10th edition at EMNLP 2026. Interested in serving as a reviewer? 🔗 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... Thank you for helping us make #WOAH2026 a success! #NLP #AI #OnlineSafety

docs.google.comWOAH 2026 - Reviewer Sign-UpWOAH 2026 will take place at EMNLP in Budapest on 29 November, 2026. The deadline for paper submission will be June 26, 2026. We intend to use the SoftConf platform, and as in previous years, we wi...

Thomas Davidson reposted

Our paper on the pandemic and populism is online in Comparative Political Studies. We find that local COVID-19 transmission increased support for right-wing populists in Europe, and triangulate our findings across data from social media, elections, and surveys.

Thomas Davidson reposted

Replying to @ingmarweber.de

This is a fairly large (EUR 29M) initiative at Universität des Saarlandes around using data and computational methods to understand and support societal tranformations. As part of this initiative, *five* professorships will be created. Talk to me about details.

Thomas Davidson reposted

✨New paper out @nature.com ✨ For 8 weeks around the 2024 US election, we randomly assigned 2,000 people to use social media algos we built ourselves. Do engagement-based algorithms amplify intergroup, moral & emotional (IME) content—and does that distort how we see political norms? 🧵🔗 👇

Our paper on the pandemic and populism is online in Comparative Political Studies. We find that local COVID-19 transmission increased support for right-wing populists in Europe, and triangulate our findings across data from social media, elections, and surveys.

This paper was a product of an interdisciplinary collaboration between a political scientist, a sociologist, and an economist. And it was done entirely remotely over many Zoom calls over the past five years; the three of us are still yet to meet in person!

Another angle I have been thinking about is what this means for computational sociology (and CSS more broadly) as a field. Is all social science becoming CSS? Do all social scientists now need to understand word embeddings, etc? When is AI a computational method, and when is it something else?

Thomas Davidson@thomasdavidson.bsky.social

Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:

Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:

Per Engzell@pengzell.bsky.social

What can we learn from automating an entire quantitative social science paper, from prompt to finished product? Thread about ongoing work with @natewilmers.bsky.social 1/12 Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...

View full thread

2. How do we reallocate our labor as a consequence of AI? I'm sure many people wish they could spend more time theorizing, writing, and collecting data, focusing on the "craft" of research rather than mundane tasks. Or do we just have to output more due to increased productivity expectations?

Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:

Per Engzell@pengzell.bsky.social

What can we learn from automating an entire quantitative social science paper, from prompt to finished product? Thread about ongoing work with @natewilmers.bsky.social 1/12 Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...

1. How AI, particularly agentic models, force us to make tacit knowledge explicit. e.g. Writing clear directives about exactly how a figure should look. If we don't do this then we just get some average of what scientific plots look like. This is also the data AI companies are most interested in...

Thomas Davidson reposted

📣 SKAT virtual event tomorrow! Are you a sociologist interested in careers in the tech industry? Come join our panel of experts who can chat about hiring and the industry writ large.

Thomas Davidson reposted

Is social media dying? How much did Twitter change as it became X? Which party now dominates the conversation? Using nationally representative ANES data from 2020 & 2024, I map how the U.S. social media landscape has changed Here are the key take-aways 🧵 Full paper out now in in JQD:DM!

journalqd.org Shifts in U.S. Social Media Use, 2020–2024: Decline, Fragmentation, and Enduring Polarization | Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media

Thomas Davidson reposted

This blog by @maartengr.bsky.social has some awesome visualizations showing the architecture and components of multimodal models. This will be a great pedagogical resource, up there with Christopher Olah's blogs and 3Brown1Blue's videos.

Gus@gusthema.bsky.social

If you want to understand more about the internals of Gemma 4 and how the model is structured, this visual guide is a perfect start: newsletter.maartengrootendorst.com/p/a-visual-g...

Thomas Davidson reposted

3-year contract for a Phd position in Sociology on the discourse of/about AI, at l'Institut polytechnique de Paris.

Samuel Coavoux@scoavoux.bsky.social

Join us at @crestsociology.bsky.social : call for a PhD grant in computational sociology/CSS on the media framing of AI www.css.cnrs.fr/framing-ai-r... w/ @eollion.bsky.social. Deadline for application is May 15th

It appears this was due to badly configured repetition_penalty parameter in transformers. Essentially, if you penalize repetition then the model optimizes by regurgitating random tokens. The responses are now coherent after removing this - but painfully slow.

Thomas Davidson@thomasdavidson.bsky.social

Question for AI Bsky, has anyone managed to get useful reasoning traces from open-weights models? Here is some typical output I got from Qwen 3.5 on a vision task. It starts out reasonable but descends into gibberish (neuralese?) @lauraknelson.bsky.social @tedunderwood.com @cbarrie.bsky.social

Thomas Davidson reposted

WOAH is coming back for its 10th edition at EMNLP 2026 in Budapest! 🎊 For this important anniversary, we invite authors to critically reflect on our achievements as a community and adjust the aim going forward. Stay tuned, more updates coming soon! #EMNLP2026 #WOAH2026 #NLProc

Thomas Davidson reposted

AI-generated summaries of history led to more liberal opinions compared to Wikipedia, while summaries by chatbots prompted to use a conservative framing produced more conservative opinions—but primarily among conservative readers. In PNAS Nexus: https://ow.ly/1moU50YpOHN

Great write-up on our recent studies: “Back in the day, if you wanted to know what the Seattle General Strike was, you’d grab an encyclopedia or ... check Wikipedia,” Karell said. “Now, you just ask ChatGPT... Increasingly, the information we rely on is being packaged by tools built by companies.”

Yale ISPS@ispsyale.bsky.social

New study: AI Tools Like ChatGPT Make Learning Easier — and More Persuasive bit.ly/4cmVUxO @thomasdavidson.bsky.social

Thomas Davidson reposted

Want to learn about computational social science *for free* and identify new research partners across academic fields? Apply to one of the 2026 Summer Institutes in Computational Social Science (described in yellow in the attached map) here: sicss.io/locations

View full thread

This helps distinguish between two pathways of AI influence: latent biases baked into models from training, and prompting biases introduced through deliberate prompting. Both can shape opinions even when the content is factually accurate. 3/4 Paper: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...

academic.oup.comHow latent and prompting biases in AI-generated historical narratives influence opinionsAbstract. Large language models (LLMs) can be used to persuade people on a range of issues, particularly through user-driven strategies such as personalizi

Robustness checks showed that GPT-4o tended to generate liberal-leaning summaries across a wide range of historical events, highlighting the importance of default biases. More work is needed to understand how these patterns might generalize to other topics and across different models. 4/4

We ran an experiment where people read GPT-4o summaries or Wikipedia. Default summaries with no ideological slant and texts generated using a liberal persona both shifted readers toward liberal opinions relative to Wikipedia. Conservative-framed texts only shifted among conservatives. 2/4

Thomas Davidson reposted

AI does not engage in motivated reasoning While individuals processing information may be motivated to reach a certain conclusion, LLMs have no such motivation and operate on purely cognitive input. As such, they do not mimic humans in motivated reasoning tasks. arxiv.org/pdf/2601.16130

Thomas Davidson reposted

LLMs are very good at extracting information from academic articles. They are much better than even highly trained humans (our grad RAs had hundreds of hours of practice). And of course they're ~1000x cheaper and faster

Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs.net

We coded our ~100k articles using LLMs. Should you believe them? To answer this, we benchmarked 4 human RAs against 3 LLMs on their ability to recover ground truth article data. Details in the paper and appendices, but the LLMs did well and handily beat the highly trained humans.

Thomas Davidson reposted