Pinned
Thomas Davidson
Thomas Davidson
@thomasdavidson.bsky.social
Sociologist at UNC. I study topics including right-wing politics, populism, and hate speech on social media. I also write about computational methods and AI. https://www.thomasrdavidson.com/
961 followers730 following104 posts
Thomas Davidson reposted
New preprint! A review article on Generative AI and Society, with the fantastic @thomasdavidson.bsky.social & Danny Karell (smartly not online!) osf.io/preprints/so... The lit on genAI is sprawling and mostly not in sociology. Our goal is to synthesize core themes relevant to sociologists. +
I just landed in Burlington for @ic2s2.bsky.social. Looking forward to seeing everyone at the conference. I'm giving a talk about large reasoning models tomorrow and Duhui Lee is presenting some of our new work on conspiracy theories and visual media on Thursday #IC2S2
Thomas Davidson reposted
Thomas Davidson reposted
Replying to @wi-rex.bsky.social
Ranjit Lall, @thomasdavidson.bsky.social & Felix Hagemeister confirm the boosting influence of public health shocks on right-wing populism using data from France, Great Britain and the Netherlands: doi.org/10.1177/0010...
Thomas Davidson reposted
📢 Call for Reviewers: WOAH @ #EMNLP2026 WOAH is looking for reviewers to help evaluate submissions for our 10th edition at EMNLP 2026. Interested in serving as a reviewer? 🔗 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F... Thank you for helping us make #WOAH2026 a success! #NLP #AI #OnlineSafety
Thomas Davidson reposted
Thomas Davidson reposted
Thomas Davidson reposted
✨New paper out @nature.com ✨ For 8 weeks around the 2024 US election, we randomly assigned 2,000 people to use social media algos we built ourselves. Do engagement-based algorithms amplify intergroup, moral & emotional (IME) content—and does that distort how we see political norms? 🧵🔗 👇
Thomas Davidson reposted
A new paper in Nature finds that engagement-based algorithms on social media amplifies intergroup, moralized and emotional (IME) information + toxic content relative to reverse-chronological feeds, with the largest increases in moral outrage and political content. www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Another angle I have been thinking about is what this means for computational sociology (and CSS more broadly) as a field. Is all social science becoming CSS? Do all social scientists now need to understand word embeddings, etc? When is AI a computational method, and when is it something else?
Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:
Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:
What can we learn from automating an entire quantitative social science paper, from prompt to finished product? Thread about ongoing work with @natewilmers.bsky.social 1/12 Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...
Lots of provocations here, looking forward to reading. Its a brave new world for social science! I'm optimisic about automating the "boring parts" of research, but pessimistic about implications of the deluge of slop (its bad enough already). Two threads I find interesting re agentic research:
What can we learn from automating an entire quantitative social science paper, from prompt to finished product? Thread about ongoing work with @natewilmers.bsky.social 1/12 Paper: osf.io/preprints/so...
Thomas Davidson reposted
Thomas Davidson reposted
Is social media dying? How much did Twitter change as it became X? Which party now dominates the conversation? Using nationally representative ANES data from 2020 & 2024, I map how the U.S. social media landscape has changed Here are the key take-aways 🧵 Full paper out now in in JQD:DM!
Thomas Davidson reposted
I’m #hiring a PhD Student in Computational Social Science / Agentic Large Language Models. Know anyone who might be interested? www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/44...
Thomas Davidson reposted
🚨 Update: WOAH Mentorship @ #EMNLP2026 🚨 Deadline extended to April 17! 📅 Still time to apply as mentor or mentee and develop your WOAH submission with expert guidance 💡 📝 Mentor: forms.gle/XaK8KBFomaWZ... 📝 Mentee: forms.gle/AC5akVcdzsCv... Join us! 🌍 #NLP #WOAH
This blog by @maartengr.bsky.social has some awesome visualizations showing the architecture and components of multimodal models. This will be a great pedagogical resource, up there with Christopher Olah's blogs and 3Brown1Blue's videos.
If you want to understand more about the internals of Gemma 4 and how the model is structured, this visual guide is a perfect start: newsletter.maartengrootendorst.com/p/a-visual-g...
Thomas Davidson reposted
📄Published Today in Nature: 500 researchers reproduced 100 studies across the social & behavioral sciences to assess their analytical robustness (led by @balazsaczel.bsky.social & @szaszibarnabas.bsky.social). Article: www.nature.com/articles/s41... Preprint: osf.io/preprints/me... TLDR: 1/11
Thomas Davidson reposted
3-year contract for a Phd position in Sociology on the discourse of/about AI, at l'Institut polytechnique de Paris.
Join us at @crestsociology.bsky.social : call for a PhD grant in computational sociology/CSS on the media framing of AI www.css.cnrs.fr/framing-ai-r... w/ @eollion.bsky.social. Deadline for application is May 15th
It appears this was due to badly configured repetition_penalty parameter in transformers. Essentially, if you penalize repetition then the model optimizes by regurgitating random tokens. The responses are now coherent after removing this - but painfully slow.
Question for AI Bsky, has anyone managed to get useful reasoning traces from open-weights models? Here is some typical output I got from Qwen 3.5 on a vision task. It starts out reasonable but descends into gibberish (neuralese?) @lauraknelson.bsky.social @tedunderwood.com @cbarrie.bsky.social
Question for AI Bsky, has anyone managed to get useful reasoning traces from open-weights models? Here is some typical output I got from Qwen 3.5 on a vision task. It starts out reasonable but descends into gibberish (neuralese?) @lauraknelson.bsky.social @tedunderwood.com @cbarrie.bsky.social
Excited to be in Toronto to share my latest research in the UTM sociology speaker series and conduct a graduate student masterclass this afternoon! www.sociology.utoronto.ca/events/utm-s...
Thomas Davidson reposted
Thomas Davidson reposted
AI-generated summaries of history led to more liberal opinions compared to Wikipedia, while summaries by chatbots prompted to use a conservative framing produced more conservative opinions—but primarily among conservative readers. In PNAS Nexus: https://ow.ly/1moU50YpOHN
Thomas Davidson reposted
Call for Submissions: AI for Social Science Methodology (Yale) • Keynote: @nachristakis.bsky.social • Panel with editors of leading journals on publishing AI research • Mentoring roundtables for early-career scholars • Generous travel support Discussion-driven, high-quality research.
Thomas Davidson reposted
Recently, van der Stigchel and colleagues posted a provocative commentary suggesting that we should be wary of bots in online behavioral data collection (🧵by @cstrauch.bsky.social here: bsky.app/profile/cstr...). But should we? Here is my response letter osf.io/preprints/ps.... 1/5
Great write-up on our recent studies: “Back in the day, if you wanted to know what the Seattle General Strike was, you’d grab an encyclopedia or ... check Wikipedia,” Karell said. “Now, you just ask ChatGPT... Increasingly, the information we rely on is being packaged by tools built by companies.”
New study: AI Tools Like ChatGPT Make Learning Easier — and More Persuasive bit.ly/4cmVUxO @thomasdavidson.bsky.social
Thomas Davidson reposted
Our new paper is out today in @pnasnexus.org with colleagues at Yale (@matthewshu.com, Danny Karell, @keitarookura.bsky.social) We wanted to understand how using AI-generated summaries to learn about history influenced attitudes compared to existing resources like Wikipedia. 1/4
Thomas Davidson reposted
Want to learn about computational social science *for free* and identify new research partners across academic fields? Apply to one of the 2026 Summer Institutes in Computational Social Science (described in yellow in the attached map) here: sicss.io/locations
Our new paper is out today in @pnasnexus.org with colleagues at Yale (@matthewshu.com, Danny Karell, @keitarookura.bsky.social) We wanted to understand how using AI-generated summaries to learn about history influenced attitudes compared to existing resources like Wikipedia. 1/4
This helps distinguish between two pathways of AI influence: latent biases baked into models from training, and prompting biases introduced through deliberate prompting. Both can shape opinions even when the content is factually accurate. 3/4 Paper: academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/ar...
Our new paper is out today in @pnasnexus.org with colleagues at Yale (@matthewshu.com, Danny Karell, @keitarookura.bsky.social) We wanted to understand how using AI-generated summaries to learn about history influenced attitudes compared to existing resources like Wikipedia. 1/4
Thomas Davidson reposted
a gpt in a sublime 200 lines of pure Python — it is all there. Incredible for teaching students (and yourself) karpathy.github.io/2026/02/12/m...
Thomas Davidson reposted
Come work w CSMaP! We're hiring two postdocs.: one with a focus on AI; other is general focus. Let me know if you have questions about the roles. And please share widely. apply.interfolio.com/181817 apply.interfolio.com/181820
Thomas Davidson reposted
Benchmarks of LLM common sense overwhelmingly rely on correct labels to report an accuracy score. But what if your "ground truth" genuinely differs from mine? In a new @pnasnexus.org paper, @duncanjwatts.bsky.social, @whiting.me and I explore the implications of this intriguing question. 🧵⤵️
Thomas Davidson reposted
📢WORK! At the Sociology department of @utrechtuniversity.bsky.social we are hiring a postdoc who will work on applications of AI in sociological research. Join our vibrant-yet-cohesive research community doing cutting-edge research. Please share or apply! www.uu.nl/en/organisat...
Thomas Davidson reposted
AI does not engage in motivated reasoning While individuals processing information may be motivated to reach a certain conclusion, LLMs have no such motivation and operate on purely cognitive input. As such, they do not mimic humans in motivated reasoning tasks. arxiv.org/pdf/2601.16130
Thomas Davidson reposted
LLMs are very good at extracting information from academic articles. They are much better than even highly trained humans (our grad RAs had hundreds of hours of practice). And of course they're ~1000x cheaper and faster
We coded our ~100k articles using LLMs. Should you believe them? To answer this, we benchmarked 4 human RAs against 3 LLMs on their ability to recover ground truth article data. Details in the paper and appendices, but the LLMs did well and handily beat the highly trained humans.
Thomas Davidson reposted
Really interesting new paper from some of my former @gesis.org colleagues in @bigdatasoc.bsky.social: "From (almost) open to heavily restricted data access – The development of the Twitter/X developer policies" doi.org/10.1177/2053... #commsky #computationalsocialscience