Well, That Was Really Spooky

Well, That Was Really Spooky

@thediscoveryofzero.com

Behavior Analyst, M.Ed., Liberal Socialist, Musician, He/Him, Coachella Valley https://elirector.bandcamp.com/music

2.3K followers1.2K following26.6K posts

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

I do my best to be present and reflective (in ACT, the clinical process that comes out of RFT), this is called 'defusion', where you take a step back and notice your thoughts and emotions. Also very similar to 'mindfulness'.

You can't possibly be aware of everything. But it's amazing how much you can learn when you start to pay attention to this dynamic. I think it can be a good starting place for discussion as well, as it places communication in this more objective, neutral, observer-oriented location.

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

that more frames are needed to place on top. The conservative worldview, like any, has many twisting pathways all trying to iron out inconsistencies and discontinuities. But conservatism has the extra challenge of been so narrow and at odds with basic intuitive morality, among many incoherencies.

Liberals have our frames too. When we are responding we are bringing all of our frames. As a middle class WASP het man I have my share. Many come through sheer ignorance. Aside from those I have learned, and need to unlearn, I have not yet *made* other frames. I still notice my little bigotries.

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

The important thing to note is that these associations are completely 'real' to him. The feelings of fear, maybe anger, maybe hatred, are real. The thoughts and memories certainly are. Even if the facts aren't, to him they are. And even the outlandish MAGA nonsense is real - or feels, seems real.

Because - and I've thought about this for a while - to be conservative is to move through the world in a really fucked up headspace. To be a white christian capitalist supremacist introduces so many rules and assumptions into daily life, that conflict with reality, often with basic human dignity,

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

part of what he sees and feels is 'violence'. Most of it is likely unconscious, either never reflected upon or at least not in that moment. (This is also a large part of conservative epistemology: avoiding reflection. At its deepest root, it is anti-liberal, meaning it's highest authority is

traditional dogma. Any outside authorities trained inwards, self-critically, threaten to subvert its traditional authority, so they are routinely shunned. Often discounted via conspiracy, misdirection or brute force "This is the way we've always done it")

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

whites and minorities. All of these are learning histories across many relational frames. The conservative is 'primed' to make associations between white people and virtue/success/safety, and minorities and immorality/failure/danger.

In our example, the conservative responds to some stimulus involving a minority group - maybe he made a joke about dangerous illegal immigrants (which would be racist to focus on because non immigrants are actually more violent). It was instantaneous to him. When he thinks 'immigrant',

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

View full thread

Here's a classic example that happens between conservatives and liberals. The C will say something that the L views as racist. The L will point this out. The C will deny it, at least knowing racism is socially unacceptable, and likely agreeing, and say the L is being too sensitive.

If we stipulate that conservatism prefers hierarchy, feels white christian culture is superior, and believes capitalist wealth is the best determinant of human worth, even if it won't explicitly say it, or even admit it. The logic of these beliefs leads to assumptions about the poor, the rich,

It's interesting to think about how this actually works in our lives. Remember that the relational frames happen instantaneously, as they are responses to environmental stimuli. They are also generalized emotions or thoughts related to *other stimuli*. That is, the 'triggering' environmental stimuli

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

has taken on associations with another - usually abstract stimuli - across multiple relational frames, such as temporality, causality, functionality, etc. So, for instance, this is how a perfectly normal looking brown skinned person evokes fear in a white person: they have taken on associations

across multiple relational frames. What those frames are and how they came to be requires further analysis of environmental contingencies in the learning history - what have they been exposed to, etc. And it also of course looks at the behavior and language of the white person.

Well, That Was Really Spooky reposted

For the fabulously wealthy, paying taxes is pretty much optional. They can borrow against their vast wealth, which is mostly an untaxed capital gain, without paying taxes. When they die, the capital gain goes to zero. And loopholes exist to bypass the estate tax too.

Jen Taub@jentaub.bsky.social

“Billionaires who popularized stock-based lending include Larry Ellison and Elon Musk. Both borrow to avoid having to sell shares—which could trigger a taxes and dilute their voting rights—in companies they founded.” www.wsj.com/finance/the-...

Well, That Was Really Spooky reposted

Well, That Was Really Spooky reposted

"An audience gives the Hitler salute at the Bund headquarters in Kenosha, Wisconsin, in 1937." 
Photo: Chicago Reader / Chicago Sun-Times

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

I talk about relational Frames a lot here, so figured I should review again. It's based on the concept of a verbal operant, and rooted in the 4 term contingency: Something in the environment triggers your response (accounting for your motivation, importantly) which then alters the environment,

View full thread

usually with aversive stimuli). The liberal tradition is built in large part on epistemological clarity, specifically in human understandings of ourselves and our values. It almost seeks a state of thermostatic equilibrium in that egalitarianism seems to increase with entropy.

But liberal thought isn’t immune. Please. This stuff is incredibly infectious - it’s a basic part of how we operate. It’s basically how movies, art, stories, relationships, feelings, navigating the world, I don’t know - everything works. We are constantly responding to the world via these frames.

All of which to say this is basically the science behind implicit bias. There are frames that we have built up for *every single stimulus* in our lives. It can just sit there latently, coloring our responses. Or it can be embedded within tapestries of rules, assumptions and worldviews.

Well, That Was Really Spooky@thediscoveryofzero.com

I talk about relational Frames a lot here, so figured I should review again. It's based on the concept of a verbal operant, and rooted in the 4 term contingency: Something in the environment triggers your response (accounting for your motivation, importantly) which then alters the environment,

One way around this is a technique called ‘cognitive defusion’. It’s basically using our brain’s ability to self-reflect on our thoughts and emotions in response to stimuli. Proper epistemologies can go a long way towards flagging reactive thoughts (derived through transitive relations,

Ok, horrific explicit white supremacy from our old boy. Good stuff, America.

The Bulwark@thebulwark.com

RFK: "There's five hundred million Arabs in the world. And yet they don't produce science. They don't win the Nobel Prize. They don't win the Fields Prize. They don't win the Wolf Prize. They don't produce literature."

Well, That Was Really Spooky reposted

But I think I may have finally discovered why I’m obsessed with conservatism so much. They sanctify the one thing I so often lack: common sense. Authoritarianism has 18 words, which is hard to fit on a sign so they were probably hard to read.