Dustin Moskovitz reposted
Dustin Moskovitz
Dustin Moskovitz
@moskov.goodventures.org
Co-founder at Asana and Good Ventures (a funding partner of Coefficient Giving). Strange looper. You can just build the things you want to see in the world. “Criminally underliked”
42.8K followers437 following8.5K posts
Dustin Moskovitz reposted
Good story from @stephanienolen.bsky.social on what the AI-driven "third wave" of philanthropy might mean for global health: www.nytimes.com/2026/10/20/...
Dustin Moskovitz reposted
seven months later, I am pleased to report that while morale remains alarmingly low, there *has* been a marked reduction in reports of in-group fighting about timelines
does the AI safety field have an alignment solution for future, more capable models? the answer is no. but does it have a detailed and pointed plan to develop a solution? also no. but! does the research community have determination & espirit de corps?!! wait, why are you crying? come back!!
Dustin Moskovitz reposted
Dustin Moskovitz reposted
Happy Stanislav Petrov Day He passed in 2017. As Encyclopedia Britannica puts it, “He is survived by his two children, two grandchildren, and the entire human race.” If you don't know his story, please take 3 minutes now to learn it. @gchalliance.bsky.social @docsforclimate.bsky.social
He pushes back against doomerism while also calling for the labs to be *fully shut down* if lesser harms occur. I really think we have to go slow to keep going fast here - nobody wants the future where a catastrophe leads to a full shutdown but we're painting ourselves into a corner with rhetoric.
Q&A with Jensen Huang on AI creating more jobs than it destroys, pushing back against AI doomerism, Chinese open models, the Hugging Face acquisition, and more (Ezra Klein/New York Times) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink
imagine if all the evidence for the Iran war becoming a neverending disaster was “a bunch of guys played games about war and agreed it was very bad and might happen” instead of empiricism. true strategists know there is only *one* tried and true method for finding out
Imagine if all the evidence for climate change was "a bunch of guys on a website thought very hard about it and agreed it was very bad and might happen" instead of empiricism.
Folks like to lump all the groups and motivations (and, here on BSKY, sexual proclivities) of the people in AI safety together, but the reality is a complex and often contradictory cast of characters. Careful not to write off the whole thing because parts are weird. medium.com/@moskov/work...
Another good take like this bsky.app/profile/taut...
look I'm pretty close to all this stuff so treat me as biased. but fwiw i identify as neither rationalist nor EA and have been monogamous all my life most of this thread is factually true, but imo substantially misleading—more so about EA and AI safety at large than rationalists per se
Folks like to lump all the groups and motivations (and, here on BSKY, sexual proclivities) of the people in AI safety together, but the reality is a complex and often contradictory cast of characters. Careful not to write off the whole thing because parts are weird. medium.com/@moskov/work...
Dustin Moskovitz reposted
Dustin Moskovitz reposted