Mark Hooper

Mark Hooper

@markhooper.bsky.social

Founder of Tricky Goose Training (https://www.trickygoose.training), COPE Council Member, Philosophy PhD. #researchintegrity #openscience #academicintegrity #philosophy

805 followers277 following146 posts

If I were on the selection committee for an academic position, I would ask, "Tell me about an interesting paper that you've read lately." Honestly, this would be more instructive and revealing than the question, "Tell me about an interesting paper you've written." #researchintegrity #academicsky

Lunchtime project. What goes in Ragu Bolognese? According to this (convenience) sample of 30 recipes by celebrity chefs, there's plenty of variation! Thanks, GPT-Astra. And apologies if anyone is actually from Bologna and feeling horrified.

Oh, and some of the unique ingredients are amusing: espresso (Martha Collison), fish sauce and gelatine (J. Kenji López-Alt), gravy granules (Tom Kerridge), Swiss chard (Maggie Beer), cloves (Guy Grossi), tarragon (Donna Hay), and rosé (Bobby Flay). For my part, I add shavings of lemon zest.

Mark Hooper reposted

📢 Publication Integrity Week 2026 📢 Save the date in your calendars as we continue to build a week of virtual events around this year’s theme: Rooted in principles. United in purpose 👉 Monday 2 to Thursday 5 November 2026 #PublicationIntegrityWeek #PublicationEthics #ResearchIntegrity

Tadej Pogačar, man. Imagine if Michael Jordan had a deep respect for Isiah Thomas, and a genuine desire to see Scotty Pippin glorified. Tadej Pogačar. #TDF2026 #couchpeloton

If you’ll be at the World Conferences on Research Integrity, consider joining our pres, “Friendly Ghosts?”. We’ll discuss authorship dilemmas when contributors decline. Tuesday, 11.15am, Stream G. Me, Jennifer Wright, and Michael Vincent #WCRI2026 #researchintegrity @wcrifoundation.bsky.social

I feel like I'm noticing way more Moderator comments on @pubpeer.com . Am I tripping? I don't have an opinion about it yet, but I'm interested by it. Here's an example of a recent Moderator comment that appears in the middle of an author's comment, providing fact-checking. #researchintegrity

Mark Hooper reposted

Less is more. This aphorism is constantly on my mind. The scientific publication system is under tremendous strain, the last thing it needs is a massive dump of LLM generated/aided papers. If you love science, then show it some love. www.nature.com/articles/d41...

nature.comI’m going to halve my publication output. You should consider slow science, tooIf we don’t slow down, the research enterprise is going to crash, argues Adrian Barnett.

Discussions at #AIMOS2025 re: financial conflicts of expert witnesses, reminds me of this editorial from 1882 (!): “…the saying of a well-known judge that liars might be divided into three classes - liars, great liars, and scientific-witnesses - recommends itself to many.” [The Times, 4 April]

It occurred to me that we need Contributor Statements (like CRediT), except to describe various uses of Gen-AI in research. But like all decent thoughts, someone else had it first. I really like what this group has done. Their tool is useful: www.leidenmadtrics.nl/articles/gai... #researchintegrity

leidenmadtrics.nlGAIDeT: a practical taxonomy for declaring AI use in research and publishingTransparency of AI use in academia matters for authors, editors, reviewers, readers and repository moderators. This blog post introduces GAIDeT, a taxonomy for the structured disclosure of Generative ...

Some folks confuse these things —who think the 'water movement' must be flawed, since bottled water is expensive, and contaminated water is poisonous. Clean water and #openaccess both cost $. We don't really need corporations selling packaged products, but communities funding reservoirs and taps.

Mark Hooper reposted

Mark Hooper reposted

Mark Hooper reposted

A new #Nature story investigates a preprint by #AusHSI Prof @aidybarnett.bsky.social, which has found that peer reviewers are more likely to approve articles that cite their own work. When the reasons for citing are hard to justify, this can make the peer-review process transactional. #peerreview

nature.comPeer reviewers more likely to approve articles that cite their own workPreprint examines how citations can influence the review process.

Mark Hooper reposted

Two academics emailed me, saying kind things about my work. This honestly made my week. If your Friday allows time, hammer-out a quick note that might make someone else's week. Let's emulate the good ones.

Mark Hooper reposted

A paper that combines #peerreview & cheese... what could be better? Answer: writing said paper with @abalkina.bsky.social @image-integrity.bsky.social & Marie Souliere. Read on to learn how the Swiss Cheese Model could help peer review & #researchintegrity onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...

onlinelibrary.wiley.comRethinking Peer Review Using the Swiss Cheese Model to Better Flag Problematic ManuscriptsClick on the article title to read more.

Mark Hooper reposted

Mark Hooper reposted

Great article!

Mark Rubin@markrubin.bsky.social

“Nothing we say here is against the use of proxies, which are useful, necessary, and unavoidable. The risks occur when we blindly pursue the proxy itself, use the wrong proxies, or mistake the proxy for the thing itself.” Michael Vincent‪ & @markhooper.bsky.social’s new work on research integrity.

Mark Hooper reposted

Today, our article "The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly" is finally published in PNAS. I hope that it proves to be a wake-up-call for the whole scientific community. reeserichardson.blog/2025/08/04/a...

reeserichardson.blogA do-or-die moment for the scientific enterpriseReflecting on our paper “The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly”