Stanford Law School

Stanford Law School

@law.stanford.edu

One of the nation's leading institutions for legal scholarship and education. https://law.stanford.edu/

740 followers60 following425 posts

Stanford RegLab has been selected for the Public Benefit Innovation Fund’s second round. RegLab will develop and test an AI tool that helps surface missing or unclear information at the time of application, in partnership with Maryland and Colorado. www.centerforcivicfutures.org/resources/ce...

centerforcivicfutures.orgCenter for Civic Futures | Center for Civic Futures Awards $11 Million to Tackle the Toughest Barriers in Safety Net Delivery with AIAnnoucements + Press Releases

How will AI change expert work? Can the professions keep public trust—and widen access? Stanford Law and @stanfordmedicine.bsky.social take on the shared challenges between the sister professions. The Future of the Legal and Medical Professions, Oct. 26. Register: web.cvent.com/event/765587...

web.cvent.comSummary - Future of the Legal and Medical Professions SymposiumOctober 26, 2026 | 8:15 am - 4:00 pm | Reception to followPaul Brest Hall, Stanford University555 Salvatierra Walk, Stanford CA 94305

Prof. Jack Balkin didn't come to SLS w/ an uplifting Constitution Day message. In a wide-ranging lecture, he argued that new tech is reshaping constitutional power, weakening democratic institutions, & accelerating what he calls “constitutional rot.” law.stanford.edu/press/techno...

law.stanford.eduTechnology, Power, and ‘Constitutional Rot’ | Stanford Law SchoolThe federal government increasingly relies on private companies to govern: Palantir for foreign intelligence, Amazon for cloud computing, Starlink for

When can states redraw congressional districts? Can the White House change mail voting rules through the Postal Service? Prof. Nate Persily talks to Stanford Legal discussing the legal battles over 2026 election rules—& what's at stake for democracy. law.stanford.edu/stanford-leg...

law.stanford.eduU.S. Elections Under Pressure from White House | Stanford Law SchoolNate Persily joins Pam Karlan to discuss efforts to change the rules governing the 2026 elections and the legal battles over how those changes would affect voting.

"Stanford RegLab is proud to partner with the state to pioneer a framework to rigorously learn, evaluate, & improve such a system through rapid technological change," says Prof. Dan Ho, Director of Stanford RegLab. Take a look at the new AI-powered tool: www.gov.ca.gov/2026/09/09/g...

gov.ca.govGovernment, made easier. Governor Newsom introduces AskCA, a new AI-powered tool for Californians | Governor of CaliforniaOfficial website of the State of California

Join us on Thursday, Sept. 17 at 5pm for our annual Constitution Day Lecture with Yale Law Professor Jack M. Balkin discussing "Technology and Constitutional Rot" and how the Algorithmic Society threatens democratic governance. RSVP: law.stanford.edu/event/consti...

law.stanford.eduConstitution Day Lecture: Technology and Constitutional Rot | Stanford Law SchoolTechnological change affects the Constitution not only by creating new problems of constitutional interpretation, but also by changing the distributio

SLS’s Executive Education program is launching the Legal Engineering Academy, a first-of-its-kind, two-week residential program for attorneys, executives, and other leaders who want to move beyond talking about AI and start building with it. law.stanford.edu/press/the-ri...

law.stanford.eduThe Rise of Legal Engineering | Stanford Law SchoolA new kind of leader is emerging across the legal sector. These professionals combine legal expertise with an engineering mindset, helping shape how l

Stanford Law School reposted

Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative disagreements about representation—whether AI systems should mirror the world or be designed to promote a more inclusive future. www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/unpac...

stanfordlawreview.orgUnpacking AI Bias and the Antidiscrimination Law Dilemma | Stanford Law ReviewIn their Essay, Hoang Pham, Hannah Cha, and Rashon Poole argue that contemporary disputes over "AI bias" are best understood as normative di

Congratulations to Promise Mabilo, winner of Stanford’s #2026BrightAward for Environmental Sustainability. A community organizer in Emalahleni, South Africa fighting fossil fuel pollution—learn more and register for her panel and reception: law.stanford.edu/press/promis...

law.stanford.eduPromise Mabilo, South African Clean Air Activist, Wins Stanford Bright Award | Stanford Law SchoolPromise Mabilo does not need an air-quality monitor to know when the pollution in Emalahleni is especially bad. In the coal country of South Africa’

The Supreme Court is disregarding factual evidence established by lower courts, raising concerns about judicial integrity. SLS's Duncan Hosie writes in @theatlantic.com about the Roberts Court's troubling departure from the "clear-error deference" standard. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...

theatlantic.comThe Supreme Court Isn’t Interested in FactsIn decision after decision, the conservative justices are ignoring the evidentiary record that lower courts have worked hard to establish.

Should courts use AI? SLS's Daniel E. Ho and Olivia Martin say the answer isn't banning—it's creating secure environments where judges can test models before deployment. Without this, courts risk falling behind litigants already using these tools. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/an-a...

lawfaremedia.orgAn AI Playground for the CourtsJudges face an unsatisfactory menu of AI options. A secure, judiciary-controlled sandbox for testing frontier models is the better path.

Looking for a good book or two to start before the end of summer? It's not too late! Take a look at the Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List which offers up some of our professors’ favorite reads. law.stanford.edu/stanford-law...

law.stanford.eduStanford Law School’s 2026 Summer Faculty Reading List | Stanford Law SchoolLooking for a good book or two to dig into during the summer? The Stanford Law School Faculty Summer Reading List offers up some of our professors

“The more daylight there is, the more trouble for Meta.” SLS's Nora Freeman Engstrom explains what’s at stake in the federal trial brought by state AGs over alleged harms to young users—and why its outcome could shape thousands of related cases. Read more: law.stanford.edu/2026/08/25/w...

law.stanford.eduWhat’s at Stake in the Meta Trial | Stanford Law School(Originally published by Stanford Report on August 25, 2026.) Four states kicked off a closely-watched trial against Meta last week, alleging that the

Stanford Law Professor Easha Anand elected to the American Law Institute, joining 27 other current or emeriti Stanford Law faculty in advancing ALI's mission to clarify, modernize, and improve American law. Read more:

law.stanford.eduStanford Law School Professor Easha Anand Elected to the American Law Institute | Stanford Law SchoolStanford Law School Professor Easha Anand, co-director of the law school’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic, has been elected to the American Law Ins

Who's responsible when medical AI fails? Stanford Law's Michelle Mello, co-leader of the Healthcare Ethical Assessment Lab for AI, examines the urgent need for guardrails in healthcare technology. Listen to the @kff.org episode:

kff.orgGuardrails for AI in Health Care — How High? | KFFAI is racing into everyday medicine. The rules of the road are still being written. Dr. Michelle Mello of Stanford, professor at both the Law School and the School of Medicine, and co-leader of its…

Uber's new terms require users who sue the company to disclose litigation funding agreements and waive attorney-client privilege—but the requirements are "dubious at best," writes Rhode Center fellow Brianne Holland-Stergar. Read the full opinion:

news.bloomberglaw.comUber’s New Litigation Funding Terms Would Hinder AccountabilityOpinion: Uber’s revised terms requiring access to documents exchanged with third-party litigation funders are likely unlawful but could effectively discourage lawsuits.

Stanford Legal examines presidential war powers with international law expert Allen Weiner. The episode explores how the Iran war evolved beyond its nuclear proliferation goals—and what that means for U.S. foreign policy. Listen to the episode:

law.stanford.eduThe Iran War and the Limits of Presidential Power | Stanford Law SchoolStanford’s Allen Weiner examines how the U.S. war with Iran raises questions about the president’s power to wage war and negotiate peace.

A new Rule of Law Teaching Hub from SLS’s Neukom Center brings together syllabi, readings, country case studies, and practical guidance to help instructors build and strengthen rule of law courses—and connect a dispersed community working in the field.

law.stanford.eduStanford Law School’s Neukom Center for the Rule of Law Launches New Teaching Hub | Stanford Law SchoolAs legal and democratic institutions come under renewed strain around the world, interest in the rule of law as a field of study has grown. But profes

How is the Supreme Court using history and tradition to reshape constitutional interpretation? Prof. Jeff Fisher examines pivotal 2026 rulings on birthright citizenship, voting rights, and agency independence in the latest Stanford Legal episode. Tune in:

law.stanford.eduInside the Supreme Court’s Key 2026 Decisions | Stanford Law SchoolJeff Fisher discusses a term marked by major rulings across executive power, voting, and civil rights, and what they signal about the Court’s trajectory.

"If an observer only looked at cases in which the Supreme Court explicitly overturned precedent ... you wouldn't see the degree to which precedent was discarded," said Duncan Hosie, a legal scholar at the Stanford Constitutional Law Center.

law.com'Stealth Overrulings': Did the Supreme Court Overturn More Precedent Than It Claimed? | Law.comAcross several rulings, the U.S. Supreme Court's conservative majority either outright overruled, or else functionally gutted, several precedents this term.

For Brionna Bolanos & Dayle Chung the Bremond Fellowship was a chance to pursue racial justice work that was intellectually rigorous & connected to why they came to law school. Watch the Stanford Center for Racial Justice’s fellows discuss their research.

youtu.beStanford Center for Racial Justice | Bremond Fellows 2025-2026 CohortWith continued generous support from the Wilson Sonsini Foundation, this prestigious fellowship honoring legendary Bay Area attorney Harry Bremond offers Stanford Law School 2L and 3L students a…

Congrats to SLS RegLab and the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment on receiving an inaugural AI in Action Award from the Center for Civic Futures. Their AI tool helps unemployment adjudicators identify gaps and ask the right follow-up questions.

law.stanford.eduStanford RegLab and Colorado Labor Department Receive Award for AI Adjudication Tool | Stanford Law SchoolResolving an unemployment claim often turns on asking the right questions. Adjudicators must determine which facts matter, identify what is missing or

Stanford Law School reposted

“We propose that state supreme courts amend their rules of professional conduct to impose a uniform ‘hold open’ date for offers until Oct. 1 of students’ 2L year for 2L summer positions.” @marklemley.bsky.social & I have an op-ed in Bloomberg on early recruiting news.bloomberglaw.com/us-law-week/...

news.bloomberglaw.comState Supreme Courts Can Resolve Early Legal Recruiting MessOpinion: Imposing a uniform "hold open" date for job offers to law students would likely put much-needed brakes on accelerated recruiting.

As the Class of 2026 gathered on June 13 speakers looked ahead to the graduates’ next chapters while returning often to family, friendship, gratitude, professional responsibility, and the enduring importance of community.

law.stanford.eduFor Stanford Law’s Class of 2026, a Commencement Message of Community and Purpose | Stanford Law SchoolThe 2026 commencement ceremony at Stanford Law School was a celebration of 259 graduates and of the communities that carried them to the day. As the C

In 1895, Wong Kim Ark was denied entry to the country where he was born. The landmark case that followed shaped U.S. birthright citizenship law. Stanford Center for Racial Justice students recently brought Wong’s story to life. Read more:

law.stanford.eduCenter for Racial Justice Students Help Illuminate Wong Kim Ark’s Enduring Legacy | Stanford Law SchoolIn 1895, Wong Kim Ark returned by steamship to San Francisco, the city where he had been born to immigrants from China. He was denied entry. The Supre

On Monday, June 22: The first episode of AI Sidebar with Irene Liu drops—featuring Stanford Law Dean George Triantis. A timely conversation on how AI is changing law, business, and society, and what lawyers need to be ready for next. Listen and subscribe:

ai-sidebar.simplecast.comAI SidebarAt the intersection of AI and law, the ground is shifting faster than almost anyone can keep up with. Hosted by Irene Liu of Stanford Law School’s AI Initiative, AI Sidebar brings together leading…