Hey, I'm a climate and energy writer / data analyst who focuses on corporate + govt accountability
Creator + curator of the Greensky feed: https://ketanjoshi.co/greensky/
Based in Oslo but write about US, Europe, Aus too - ketan.joshi85@gmail.com
A new post + vid for you, for the Klimakultur blog, on a WILD new survey that shows Norwegian society overestimates Equinor's renewable energy sales by an extremely massive amount
It is a shocking demonstration of fossil fuel marketing prowess -->>>
www.klimakultur.no/nyheter/equi...
Argentine media says he may have crossed into Argentina to board a private jet to the US. An ally denied he had left Brazil.
The investigation follows a Supreme Court order revoking his passports and banning him from leaving the country.
“Flávio has given up. He’s terrified. He is worried his father will die in jail, that he himself will be jailed this week and that he may have a long prison term ahead.”
This is another amazing example of an industry screaming blue murder when actually held using regulation to its obviously hollow techno-solutionist pleading.
www.wired.com/story/europe...
Data centre developers talk about reusing waste heat because they want their projects approved, not because they actually want to reuse waste heat (also see: the reason fossil fuel companies talk about CCS).
bsky.app/profile/keta...
“Flávio has given up. He’s terrified. He is worried his father will die in jail, that he himself will be jailed this week and that he may have a long prison term ahead.”
A few very important things to point out here
The first is that this analysis tells me a huge, uncontrolled data centre build-out in the US still has huge climate impacts even if plugged into the grid
Undeniably better w/ grid but it masks and disconnects the climate impacts from the data centre
In the rush to build data centers, companies are starting to use their own off grid gas generators. This results in much higher emissions – 60% to 80% – compared with using their local electricity grid and risks locking in longer-term fossil dependence. www.theclimatebrink....
I dug into Anthropic's 240,000-word prospectus so you don't have to.
The AI giant said data centers are likely to increase gas prices, it's not interested in nuclear or renewables, and it's looking to expand abroad in part due to U.S. data center backlash. subscriber.politicopro.com/newsletter/2...
Standard 'this is not peer-reviewed yet' warning, but this looks v fascinating: air pollution deaths for data centres, off-grid-gas vs grid-connecting consumption
They found grid power for xAI's Colossus sites is *WORSE* in absolute terms (!)
www.preprints.org/manuscript/2...lnkd.in/p/eE2wQyzW
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but wasn't Texas' moratorium only for grid-connected data centres (and even that has been over-stated because they're progressing applications anyway)?
So....wouldn't Project Kilby just not be subject to this?
www.semafor.com/article/10/0...
A few very important things to point out here
The first is that this analysis tells me a huge, uncontrolled data centre build-out in the US still has huge climate impacts even if plugged into the grid
Undeniably better w/ grid but it masks and disconnects the climate impacts from the data centre
In the rush to build data centers, companies are starting to use their own off grid gas generators. This results in much higher emissions – 60% to 80% – compared with using their local electricity grid and risks locking in longer-term fossil dependence. www.theclimatebrink....
Another problem - the company featured in the interview, Frost Methane, seems to sell carbon offsets from methane capture and destruction.
It feels like a risk that this is one of the goals of raising the alarm for methane leakages at data centres
www.latitudemedia.com/news/catalys...
And they're not mentioned in the post, but Anthropic, whose product Claude produced the analysis, has rapidly become one of the worst companies pushing for maximum fossil fuel use for AI
bsky.app/profile/keta...
Anthropic frantically and mindlessly speed-building massive new polluting fossil fuel infrastructure but then also buying carbon removal offsets to "help address emissions" is such as perfect demonstration of why silicon valley has failed so spectacularly to actually help tackle climate change.
A few very important things to point out here
The first is that this analysis tells me a huge, uncontrolled data centre build-out in the US still has huge climate impacts even if plugged into the grid
Undeniably better w/ grid but it masks and disconnects the climate impacts from the data centre
In the rush to build data centers, companies are starting to use their own off grid gas generators. This results in much higher emissions – 60% to 80% – compared with using their local electricity grid and risks locking in longer-term fossil dependence. www.theclimatebrink....
The carbon intensity of the US was falling nicely from 2010 to 2020 but this decade it has only been falling very slowly
Last year it rose slightly!!
ember-energy.org/data/electri...
Copernicus has BUILT IN timelapse feature and it took me less than 10m to get a vid, and I spent like, maybe 2 minutes extending the last few frames
So much data centre and AI critique is now being generated (FOR NO GOOD REASON) using the exact tools CAUSING THE PROBLEM and it makes me SO MAD
The freaking CEO of an earth observation consultancy cannot generate a 7 frame clip of site changes without using Claude, honestly, what the screaming hell are we meant to do here
The main reason I made this is because I saw the CEO of an earth imaging company post a version that got spat out of Claude and he seems fairly proud of it
Despite the fact Anthropic **is itself** destroying a rare chestnut grove for one of its data centres 🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠
futurism.com/artificial-i...
"AI can draft an essay for you, especially if you give it a high quality prompt."
Really? This is what MIT thinks high schoolers should learn?
MIT's "Day of AI" dayofai.org provides materials for K-12 teachers and claims to have reached over 5,000,000 students to date. 1/2
Top tech company leaders are meeting with religious leaders to further their own business reasons and not to engage with questions of faith, says Father Paolo Benanti who has been an AI advisor to two popes
I liked Digger but in a weird way I still agree with basically most criticisms of it? Including Adam's here which are very thoughtful and well put together:
Damn reviewing things is exhausting.
Being told you missed the point again and again when:
(1) You are aware of "the point"
(2) You think "the point" isn't very interesting
(3) You think "the point" isn't very well made
Anyway here's my review of Digger again
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LJUX...
The numbers for potential climate harm from direct fossil-fuelled data centres are just phenomenal. It makes no sense to help them realise their dreams here
New from me: The US has faced a higher cost than any other country from the global Hormuz oil shock, with the crisis adding $160 billion to its fuel bill — or $471 per person on average — despite being the world’s largest oil producer.
I watched the box-office flop Digger last night and loved it.
I was reminded that unless you’re rich/ powerful, our future will be satire about the new “norm” of climate disasters to laugh at so we don’t cry.
And Australia is great source material with all the fossil fuel projects we approve.
"I wrote up a proposal for a moratorium on AI data centers in Lochbuie. The ensuing public meeting drew more attendees than I had ever seen. They overwhelmingly supported it, and it passed easily."
Mayor Jamie Jeffery believes you can pass a data center moratorium:
I am blown away by how physically ugly smartwatches universally are now. The best looking ones are like one tiny fraction less bad than the worst-looking ones. There's no inventiveness, no thoughtfulness, nothing cool or compelling. Just ugly AF
www.zdnet.com/health/googl...
This takes @ipcc.bsky.social’s AR6 WG1 chart (Fig. SPM.10) & adds proven reserves from the Global Registry of Fossil Fuels ( @carbontracker.bsky.social with @globalenergymon.bsky.social data), the IPCC’s own 0.45 °C per 1,000 GtCO₂, & the 2 °C budget from Forster et al. 2026. CO₂ from burning only
How much of the world’s proven coal, oil and gas (i.e. already found, pays to extract at today’s prices) can still be burned for a 66% chance of holding 2 °C?
About 30%. The other 70%, 2,040 billion tonnes of CO₂, are stranded assets. Burn it all and CO₂ alone means roughly 2.7 °C
Purple = added
Roose does a very nice job signaling in the second paragraph what sort of book this will be.
He decided to write it the night after partying with ketamine-snorting effective accelerationists.
He isn’t e/acc himself, but he hangs with that crowd and accepts their premises as newsworthy,
A new twist in the MACH Energy coal expansion saga - the company had plans to "influence curriculum". 🧵
Reported today in Nine Newspapers
www.smh.com.au/environment/...
I am pretty relieved to see Australia's famously successful Clean Energy Finance Corporation stepping back from giving government backed loans to data centres, in light of the obscene, eye-watering amounts of private capital. I raised this in my recent blog post ->
ketanjoshi.co/2026/08/14/p...
a particularly good example of slophype sucking cash, oxygen and people power away from the project of fossil fuel elimination and towards the hollow and widely-hated project of AI.
theenergy.co/articles/cef...
“Our involvement in this one is to drive them to acquire green energy and other ESG initiatives within the project. Otherwise, they simply would not do it"
Is 100% true though. None of these companies are willing to take any real initiative