Giorgio Gilestro

Giorgio Gilestro

@giorgio.gilest.ro

Associate Professor at Imperial College London. https://lab.gilest.ro | lab website, science blog https://giorgio.gilest.ro | politics and science comms https://drosophila.social/@giorgiogilestro | mastodon

2.4K followers1.8K following404 posts

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Replying to @paveltomancak.bsky.social

Biology is not safe. What I actually fear the most about biology is the funding squeeze: if on one hand you have AI promising thick and thin, funders will ask themselves is it even ethical to keep funding a small group studying the chemical composition of lizards saliva? (Not a random example!)

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Wow. Amazing, prescient vision of the future of academia by @giorgio.gilest.ro You don’t need to agree, but read and consider.

Giorgio Gilestro@giorgio.gilest.ro

Academia has seen inflation in the past 30 years but it is now entering Republic of Weimar territory, with value of knowledge moving from "paper to land". In all this, Open hardware is an act of armed resistance to Technofeudalism. giorgio.gilest.ro/the-weimar-o...

Writing a manuscript with this new generations of LLMs became an impossible task. I feel that moving away from RLHF towards RLVR increased problem-solving abilities at the cost of conceptual clarity and exposure. LLMs became brilliant engineers who cannot longer comunicate with humans.

On the Navier-Stokes drama. From this exchange, I find OpenAI to be rather accomodating and I would interpret the "why would you damage your career line" as "by publishing something that is rushed, AI slopped and half baked". The request to drop Alpoge is indeed weird but I can see the complcation.

View full thread

I make predictions and hypotheses in the paper and explain how confident I am about each of them. I also apply the model to what we know about human sleep and, doing so, explain many apparent paradoxes linked to sleep length in humans.

The model builds on ideas that were put forward by many before, and was sharpened by suggestions and criticism of many colleagues. I had initially drafted this idea in a 2018 preprint. The reviewers suggested leaving that concept for a review. Here it comes, 8 years later. doi.org/10.32942/X22...

View full thread

Sleep is not one thing but a combination of processes with different elasticity. The vital component is life-saving and has zero elasticity; the useful component has some; the accessory component has the most, and lets sleep expand and contract in migratory birds, elephants - and us.

This is a review, and a positional paper proposing a new framework. This model has one major advantage: it explains all of the paradoxes of the field. It has a price, though. You may have to think about sleep in a different way and recognise the key role of evolution.

View full thread

Variability is not just between species, but also within a single animal. Some birds, for instance, sleep 16 or more hours during the winter and then go to minutes a day during the migratory & breeding season. They forego sleep almost completely for weeks or months. How is that possible?

Borrowing from economics, I introduce "sleep elasticity". The concept is Marshall's, 1890: essential goods like life-saving medicine and winter heating have low price elasticity, demand stays high as prices rise. Luxuries have high elasticity, demand drops sharply as prices rise.

All animals sleep. This is something we have rightly taken as evidence of its importance. However, they all sleep in different ways and for different amounts, from 2 to 20hrs a day, something that speaks against a unified cellular phenomenon. In biology, variability is always key to understanding.

It was alleged that Jason Arday was an academic fraud mainly based on accusation of plagiarism initially moved by Nathan Cofnas. I have compared Arday's thesis with the one he's been accused of copying and found a bare 4.2% similarity.

I did find some verbatim sentences but it would be naive to expect none: studies that measured plagiarism, e.g. Ison 2014, estimate a mean similarity index of 15%. I found 4% in a 1-to-1 match, not far from what reported by Arday's solicitors in their letter to THE: 2-7% against all literature.

When LJMU investigate the case, in March 2026, it concluded the overlap to be "well within the accepted range of compliance with the academic standards of the time". That should have been the reference for journalists, not an accusatory blogpost raised by someone with little or none academic credit.

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Beautiful creative work and a great 🧵 Kudos to all involved in this nice work 🧪

Deepa Rajan, PhD@deeparajan.bsky.social

How can a single cell learn without a brain? We explore this in my paper with @wallaceucsf.bsky.social! We discovered that single cells may learn using molecules similar to those that animal brains use to learn, like CaMKII. Cells can also propagate memory states to their progeny!

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Calling all #Drosophila #NewPI #researchers! A few spots remain for the upcoming JEDI Conference - and you won’t want to miss this! Every attendee gives a talk, making the exchange dynamic, personal, and highly interactive - all at a stunning venue that inspires collaboration and creativity.

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Immense respect for handling this situation with this level of integrity. Mistakes happen. Science is a process.

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

The authors of a Nature paper outlining a mechanism for multisensory memories in Drosophila melongaster have retracted the work after they were unable to replicate a set of imaging experiments. By @callimcflurry.bsky.social #neuroskyence www.thetransmitter.org/retraction/r...

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Well some of us are. Many top neuro journals straight up desk reject model organism papers nowadays. And if you want to get fast, detailed and precise mechanistic answers - some of these are still the best systems.

Science Magazine@science.org

An analysis of published papers on eight widely studied “model” organisms suggests work on them is fading, but not everyone is worried. https://scim.ag/3PaOvIs

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Very cool! Useful tool for #Drosophila folks. Would be great adopted by whole labs / institutions. Considering it's newness, add features? Tinkering & I don't yet see: 1) Retrospective dating / bulk stock flipping 2) Stock acquisition date 3) Column sort by chromosome 4) Reference usage citation

flyroom.net@flyroom.net

We just launched flyRoom — modern web-based stock management for Drosophila labs. No more spreadsheets, no more messy labels, no more lost stocks. Free to start, built by researchers for researchers. www.flyroom.net

Happy to announce I've launched a new service for the fly community: flyRoom, a web-based comprehensive stock manager for all your fly pushing needs. Organise all your stocks, maps all your genotypes, plan your crosses, print and scan your labels. Give it a try and let your colleagues know!

flyroom.net@flyroom.net

We just launched flyRoom — modern web-based stock management for Drosophila labs. No more spreadsheets, no more messy labels, no more lost stocks. Free to start, built by researchers for researchers. www.flyroom.net

An example of how useless X has become. 2020 Twitter would have been the place to go to get real time news on the war. Now it's 100% noise. Just old clips repackaged as new and an ocean of conspirationists talking to a crowd of blue checked clueless idiots. Incredible.

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Replying to @zackpolanski.bsky.social

There were 36 votes between the Green Party and Reform. 36 votes. Reform are absolutely stoppable - and the Green Party can win with our message to lower bills, protect the NHS and rebuild public services. Join.greenparty.org.uk

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Labour’s vote is collapsing everywhere. In Peterborough last night, as in Gorton and Denton, voting Green is the only way to stop Reform.

Election Maps UK@electionmaps.uk

Fletton & Woodston (Peterborough) Council By-Election Result: ➡️ RFM: 29.4% (New) 🌍 GRN: 27.6% (+16.2) 🌳 CON: 21.8% (-11.8) 🌹 LAB: 16.8% (-31.2) 🔶 LDM: 4.4% (-0.7) No TUSC (-1.9) as previous. Reform GAIN from Labour. Changes w/ 2024.

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

A Reuters photographer captured this image of a page from Pam Bondi's "burn book," which she used to counter any questions from Democratic lawmakers during an unhinged hearing today. It looks like the DOJ monitored members of Congress’s searches of the unredacted Epstein files. Just wow.

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

So now we have it- not only the reduction from 12-13 to 3 grants from each board recommended for funding but the budget for applicant-led research to be reduced from £200 million to £113 million per year. This is appalling, Especially given all that is happening with medical research in the US.

Research Professional News@resprofnews.bsky.social

Medical Research Council ‘will fund fewer applicant-led grants’. Confirmation from deputy leader comes as council restructures investments, with calls on hold until summer. www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...

Giorgio Gilestro reposted

Paywalled but visible to many uni-based people Apparently... Much reduced MRC success rate for grants now in pipeline Reduced MRC future funding for 'applicant-led' research But 'life sciences remain a priority'.... Lot of room for more clarity (and recognition of effects on ECRs)

Robin Bisson@robinbisson.bsky.social

Four senior UKRI leaders appeared at a press briefing this morning in the wake of RPN stories over the last week about a shake-up to research council funding Our story that the MRC is expecting to fund fewer grants through applicant-led calls that closed in September last year was confirmed ...

Interesting discussions on this topic (here and on other socials) made me realise that English provides an interesting peculiarity that other languages do not have. A distinction between intelligent and smart. Q. for skeptics and everyone: would you say that LLMs are smart but not intelligent?

Giorgio Gilestro@giorgio.gilest.ro

🧵 Why do we keep moving the goalposts on intelligence? When GPT-4 passed the bar exam, critics didn't dispute the score—they disputed whether it was "real" reasoning. When AI solved olympiad math problems, they questioned "genuine" understanding. This pattern has a history. (1/5)