FluffCopter

FluffCopter

@fluffcopter.bsky.social

280 followers82 following5K posts

This is really something every minority had to struggle with. I remember the 90's-00's had this exact conversation with black people on TV. The big issue is that minority groups have their own culture and circles that need representation, ones that cis people are largely unfamiliar with.

JenWave1995@jenwave1995.bsky.social

When trans creators are subtle, people dismiss the trans subtext as “headcanon.” When trans creators are loud and proud, people call it “obnoxious” and “cringe.” They just don’t want us to be represented in media at all. Because they don’t want us to exist at all.

View full thread

The answer to the trans representation problem is the exact same as any minority. Just let those minorities make stuff they want to make and consider that it might not be made for you. The question of "what's good representation" can only be debated among the ones being represented. Always has been.

To add to this: you *can* absolutely make a trans person who's quote on quote "just trans", I know some folk who don't put that kind of attention to themselves. But unfortunately the outside world is keen to put that attention on us regardless. You can't set this as a goal for all media.

This is really something every minority had to struggle with. I remember the 90's-00's had this exact conversation with black people on TV. The big issue is that minority groups have their own culture and circles that need representation, ones that cis people are largely unfamiliar with.

JenWave1995@jenwave1995.bsky.social

When trans creators are subtle, people dismiss the trans subtext as “headcanon.” When trans creators are loud and proud, people call it “obnoxious” and “cringe.” They just don’t want us to be represented in media at all. Because they don’t want us to exist at all.

View full thread

Second, and unfortunately it needs to be said, the pandering angle only seems reasonable when it's targeted towards minorities. If a show is made by trans people for trans people, is a cis person playing in it pandering to cis viewers? You would sound insane arguing that. The "problem" is one-sided.

And this is really the crux of the issue. Minorities- be it of race, gender, sexuality, etc.- are the only ones being placed under this microscope. It is a bludgeon to attack them specifically. The problem isn't the media, it's the viewer's perception of what they deem "normal enough for TV".

This is really something every minority had to struggle with. I remember the 90's-00's had this exact conversation with black people on TV. The big issue is that minority groups have their own culture and circles that need representation, ones that cis people are largely unfamiliar with.

JenWave1995@jenwave1995.bsky.social

When trans creators are subtle, people dismiss the trans subtext as “headcanon.” When trans creators are loud and proud, people call it “obnoxious” and “cringe.” They just don’t want us to be represented in media at all. Because they don’t want us to exist at all.

View full thread

Ok so let's say you go all out: you write a proud, community involved, openly trans person that will outright reference they're trans more than once. On the surface this seems like pandering- giving the demographic a pat on the head to generate views. But a deeper dive reveals much more than that.

First, of course, is that people like this literally exist. Many trans people had to go through most of their lives in hiding, and coming out gives them a sense of self, of belonging, and of free expression. Their transness is, quite literally, a mark of pride they want to share with the world.

This is really something every minority had to struggle with. I remember the 90's-00's had this exact conversation with black people on TV. The big issue is that minority groups have their own culture and circles that need representation, ones that cis people are largely unfamiliar with.

JenWave1995@jenwave1995.bsky.social

When trans creators are subtle, people dismiss the trans subtext as “headcanon.” When trans creators are loud and proud, people call it “obnoxious” and “cringe.” They just don’t want us to be represented in media at all. Because they don’t want us to exist at all.

Let's say you put a trans person on screen with no real connection to trans culture and history: Well, your representation is lacking because you are actively avoiding the transness of this trans character. You effectively treat transness like a separate part of the person, a detachable side piece.

Of course this isn't how this works. Sex and gender are an expression of the self. Cis people, esp cis men, are having this as a given. I challenge you to write a cis man in a way that won't make it too obvious or "in your face" that he's a dude. It's equally impossible for the rest of us.

FluffCopter reposted

idea for a kind of supernatural monster that forms at large scale conflict sites, that embodies war from different eras.

FluffCopter reposted

Monstertober 2026 Day 24. Goblin + Druid (A day later but shhh) #monstertober #monstertober2026 (DO NOT USE THIS DESIGN)

After much research I have perfected the theory of "AI as the One Ring". All AI techbros consistently fall under: - Knows it's bad, thinks they're just built different - Thinks it's inevitable and switches sides w/ no morals - Thinks it's his magic girlfriend - Evil CEO ruling over the rest of them

You can make an alignment chart out of it easy. Gollum (fell to psychosis): well intentioned, not self determined Isildur (tries to find uses): well intentioned, self determined Saruman (market predictor): asshole, not self determined Sauron (actual fascist cult leader): asshole, self determined

See this is good campaigning because hyperfixating on which type of apple is best for 3 minutes straight is about the most American thing you can do. You can completely tank your opponent's election by showing a clip of them saying "I dunno I guess I like the green ones."

Abdul El-Sayed@abdulelsayed.bsky.social

Fall is here. So we can finally talk about this serious topic... Jonagold vs. Honeycrisp apples.

FluffCopter reposted

Post your cosmic/stars art! 🪐💫 Here's Zinnie, my cyclops alien goober 👽

Jorge@corebreaker.bsky.social

Post your cosmic/stars art! 🪐💫 My pink space cop. She does mostly hang out at the plant size food court...

Gonna start a news website that exclusively posts absurd made up facts in the titles. When challenged, I'll just respond "did you even read the article?" and the article has you scroll through some ads before just saying "thanks for the click" and nothing else.

Testing your game and finding a combo or interaction you never intended during play is definitely up there. Really makes you feel like you've *got* something.

View full thread

Meet Chaos Elemental. It's one of the strongest cards you can start the game with, because it is a copy of a random card in the shop deck (which are stronger than starters on average). Thing is, if it becomes a Volatile Flame, you just gained a bunch of currency for free but also lost it forever.

Basically one of the cards a player starts the game with has ~2% chance of blowing up each time you play it. The system supports this buffoonery and it's way too funny for me to do anything about it.

Testing your game and finding a combo or interaction you never intended during play is definitely up there. Really makes you feel like you've *got* something.

This is Volatile Flame. It's a decently strong card pays you back more than it costs to add to your deck, and then removes itself from the game. A one time value burst that has the downside only being usable once. There is only one problem: