Lambeth have finally published the report on the short lived West Dulwich Street Improvement (LTN ish but very small area) scheme.
It didn't have long enough to bed in properly, but was already showing cycling up and a small reduction in overall traffic.
haveyoursay.lambeth.gov.uk/en-GB/projec...
Lambeth council recently lost (on one minor point) a Judicial Review brought by the 'West Dulwich Action Group' who are trying to block a small traffic reduction scheme in South London (which partly enable a cycle route).
www.ftbchambers.co.uk/news/news-vi...
The long saga of a cycle route through Dulwich Village has finally reached it’s ‘season finale’ as the new square is revealed.
It’s a great new public space and a key enabler of cycling in the area... and a case study on why consultation is a waste of time and money.
These groups aren't in any way representative of levels of support.
Local election results:
West Dulwich: over 70% of vote share went to candidates/parties supporting the traffic schemes.
Dulwich Village the incumbents increased their share (while the Tories who led anti campaigns saw share fall)
Lambeth have finally published the report on the short lived West Dulwich Street Improvement (LTN ish but very small area) scheme.
It didn't have long enough to bed in properly, but was already showing cycling up and a small reduction in overall traffic.
haveyoursay.lambeth.gov.uk/en-GB/projec...
Lambeth council recently lost (on one minor point) a Judicial Review brought by the 'West Dulwich Action Group' who are trying to block a small traffic reduction scheme in South London (which partly enable a cycle route).
www.ftbchambers.co.uk/news/news-vi...
It also manages to claim both that traffic on boundary roads was slower moving and also that there was an increase in speeding. 🤷♂️
Anyway this was a tiny scheme, and it was only the Stage 1 report - in Lambeth's other LTNs further reports showed greater positive impact.
The West Dulwich Action Group (who brought legal action against Lambeth and are quoted by Telegraph) went on to oppose CPZ parking restrictions and a cycleway.
As the "West Dulwich Action Group" launches a legal challenge against what they describe as a "rushed implementation of a cycleway" lets have a look at the history of this route...
Rosendale Road formed part of Quietly 7 which was announced in 2013 and was supposed to be built by 2016.....
Lambeth have finally published the report on the short lived West Dulwich Street Improvement (LTN ish but very small area) scheme.
It didn't have long enough to bed in properly, but was already showing cycling up and a small reduction in overall traffic.
haveyoursay.lambeth.gov.uk/en-GB/projec...
Lambeth council recently lost (on one minor point) a Judicial Review brought by the 'West Dulwich Action Group' who are trying to block a small traffic reduction scheme in South London (which partly enable a cycle route).
www.ftbchambers.co.uk/news/news-vi...
The Telegraph is doing their usual Steve Bird thing of misrepresenting the data. It's a safer neighbourhood scheme - it's intended to discourage driving and enable walking and cycling. It was never an 'anti congestion' measure (and didn't run for long enough to change behaviours significantly).
The “bike hub” at Battersea Power Station development. Impossible to securely lock bikes to any of the racks (which are not attached with security bolts anyway so bike can be stolen with the rack)
And it’s not signposted from the cycleway. And is first up a narrow ped path then down a staircase.
BREAKING: A hacker is attempting to breach the US Federal Election Commission's systems and that agency has had to 'temporarily shut down' its web-facing services as a result, according to an email seen by Reuters reut.rs/4zY7fwQ
Really worth noting that even in Red Wall constituencies which backed Leave, most *Labour* voters back rejoining the EU. Over 90% of Labour considerers back rejoin - opposition to EU membership is mainly coming from non-Labour voters in these seats.
Was on Times Radio yesterday making this point.
Man who spends 40% of his Gross income - £750 a month - on his car 'wants a cut to fuel duty'. Even at current prices his fuel costs for his commute are no more than £120 a month. he wants to look at why he's spending and £620 every month?
What's he driving?
you can lease a brand new R5 electric with 1 month deposit for only £330 a month. Insurance might take that to 36. Fuel costs charging at home would minimal. That's halved his monthly costs with a fancy brand new vehicle.
If you're earn 22k & drive something ridiculous you deserve no help at all
Southwark/TFL are proposing a pretty significant Bus Priority scheme for Lordship Lane. Theres a lot here - adjustments to improve ped safety, new signalised and zebra crossings, a lot of red route 24hr parking removal.
engage.southwark.gov.uk/en-GB/projec...
The Dulwich Bus Campaign supposedly wants better bus services in the area.
Unbelievably (not) they're opposed to this bus priority project because 'it will have severe consequences for people who need to drive to Lordship Lane to shop"
🤡
The long saga of a cycle route through Dulwich Village has finally reached it’s ‘season finale’ as the new square is revealed.
It’s a great new public space and a key enabler of cycling in the area... and a case study on why consultation is a waste of time and money.
In the bedrock of my soul I know he started out thinking the press pool was a literal pool and has been seething with disappointment since he discovered the mistake
Spent the weekend in Cheltenham again. Traffic speeds feel so high coming from London. Still 30mph through central streets. And this road is 40mph! There’s a (new/upgraded) cycleway alongside. But of course the junctions have loads of collisions (last 5 years data)
Gloucester is just to the west. It's c10miles from the centre of one to the other - again, easily cycle able in 45mins - 1 hour (a pretty standard commute in London)
CycleOSM shows a route between the two towns - I believe a fairly recent addition/upgraded route.
I couldn't put it better than this from yesterday. But theres also the clash of the 'working class' electrician one man business who earns more than a 'wage slave' graduate office worker whose job security is at the mercy of the next annual reorg.
It’s that great new British class system again, where ‘working class’ means ‘manual tradesman with van’, not distribution centre workers filling up buses in Northampton at shift change time, the London night buses full of cleaners, or the retail worker who relies on Islay’s carefully-timed buses.
Long tribute from Kemi Badenoch in her conference speech to Jeffrey Archer, complete with round of applause. The world is a "less colourful" place without him, she says, which is one way to describe a serial fraudster, fantasist and liar who wrecked several lives in the process.
I see a lot of people complaining about the undoubtedly stressful conditions at present on London's roads.
But I see few people complaining about motor vehicles.
Yet in the last 24 hours three vulnerable road users have died after being hit by people driving motor vehicles.
Bus priority scheme in Lambeth includes new informal crossings with central islands.
As a pedestrian I think these should be zebras which actually give clear priority
As a cyclist these create scary pinch points with drivers trying to overtake and cut back in.
I guess zebras are much more expensive but also giving priority to pedestrians potentially slows buses. A conundrum.
Here’s the draft design.
haveyoursay.lambeth.gov.uk/en-GB/folder...
And here’s the designs for Acre Lane in Brixton.
Lots of new bus lane, raised side road entries/continuous pavement, new zebras and potentially a signalised crossing to link 2 LTNs.
Bus priority scheme in Lambeth includes new informal crossings with central islands.
As a pedestrian I think these should be zebras which actually give clear priority
As a cyclist these create scary pinch points with drivers trying to overtake and cut back in.
I thought these were out of favour and buildouts on either side were preferred?
Anyone know what’s considered best practice?
@rantyhighwayman.bsky.social
This is the proposed new crossing linking a quiet street and a road that’s filtered to motor vehicles across Acre Lane (>10k vpd)
It looks overcomplicated to me (long wait times?). How could this be simpler?
This is what I've always found bizarre about the Soho Society - they often seem to claim they want to 'preserve Soho's character' but the area has massively gentrified in the time they've been operating, and they surely have had much do with that.
But now...
If The Soho Society want to "preserve the character of Soho" from the decade of their founding surely they should be advocating for the reopening of the sex cinemas, peep shows, grot shops, dodgy clip joints and brothels, all of which have pretty much vanished as Soho has gentrified in recent times
But here, when pedestrianisation of Beak Street was proposed the society's position was to oppose it. Number plate recognition so residents could continue to drive as now, no further pedestrianisation.
This is what I've always found bizarre about the Soho Society - they often seem to claim they want to 'preserve Soho's character' but the area has massively gentrified in the time they've been operating, and they surely have had much do with that.
But now...
If The Soho Society want to "preserve the character of Soho" from the decade of their founding surely they should be advocating for the reopening of the sex cinemas, peep shows, grot shops, dodgy clip joints and brothels, all of which have pretty much vanished as Soho has gentrified in recent times
they seem to fight changes that would make Soho better to "live work and visit". Wider pavements, less space taken up by parked vehicles and much less through traffic would be the best thing for the area, but they've consistently opposed that.
While Bus stop bypasses are back in the press (again) worth looking at how other countries around the world deal with cycleways and bus stops interacting....
There is pretty much a global consensus on this
A refreshing view on “access frictions” from active travel infra - which are not cyclists vs disabled but actually needs of different disabled people.
From:
@tricyclemayor.bsky.social
People who oppose creation of a Dutch style cycle network (main roads cycleways + LTNs) usually have some attractively simple sounding alternative that doesn’t stand up to any real world scrutiny.
- Just do routes to school
- Separate cycling from bus routes
- Put routes in quiet back streets
Whenever a main road cycleway (Streatham A23 this time) is announced opposition springs up saying that it should be on "adjacent, much quieter roads" instead. Here's regular comedy contributors SocEnvJust/John Stewart with their poorly thought through proposal.
Lets look at the issues...
The post 2010 cycle strategy in London is growing cycling (both in terms of trips and mode share) and the big bang of Covid era infrastructure + LTNs has pointed the growth line up again.
RBKC councillor on X trying to claim the borough has built "hundreds of [cycle] tracks and lanes".
Yet the @safecycleldn.bsky.social map shows nothing in the borough. The stuff in pink was minimal intervention and they cancelled it in any case...
lastnotlost.wordpress.com/tag/quietway/
Looking at the stuff on their map in the south of the borough
Chelsea Bridge Road has a painted lane and no parking enforcement (it's supposed to be no loading or waiting)
Oakley St (north of Albert Bridge) looks like this....
Also of note - we rode 24 miles with two people who live in rural France who'd never ridden in a big city before.
Clapham - Vauxhall - Westminster - Tower Hill - Brick Lane - Canary Wharf - Island Gardens
Battersea Power Station - Clapham Old Town
@willnorman.co.uk
Forest bike review. The 9.99 day pass is a great way to spend a day in London. We rode 24 miles with visiting nephew today, using 184mins of our 1440! Just over 5p a minute.
The bike itself? Doesn’t have the very fast acceleration of Lime but has a lot of over run (power after you stop pedalling
Pretty much the entirety of the route (red line) was either on Cycleway or through LTNs.
Much of this has been built since 2020. Almost none of it existed 15 years ago. Theres no way I'd have taken them before that.
(and the sketchiest part of the lot was Westferry Road where no Thames path)
Forest bike review. The 9.99 day pass is a great way to spend a day in London. We rode 24 miles with visiting nephew today, using 184mins of our 1440! Just over 5p a minute.
The bike itself? Doesn’t have the very fast acceleration of Lime but has a lot of over run (power after you stop pedalling
Brakes seemed worse than lime but bike felt lighter.
Saddle height is way too low for tall riders (and newest are labelled “new lower saddle” which is even worse).
A few GPS glitches - go slow near park, allowing 1 bike in a bay but not others)
Had no trouble finding bikes today.
And confirmation that blocked pavements aren’t all down to riders. We parked these neatly in a motorbike parking bay (1mb, loads of space) and came back to find the mb gone and Forest in a heap blocking pavement. 1 broken as a result.