Post

It is a much simpler example, but this always makes me go back to one of my favourite amazing bad movies, Legend of the Liquid Sword. It has one of those awesome subtitling jobs, including a great and very literal line "Your lance is 3.3 feet long". Clearly, the ask was "Just translate literally"

You have no idea how annoyed I was when I figured out why body temperature is 98.6 F and you're not considered to have a fever until it's over 100.5 F. The fact that Fahrenheit is more granular just makes it worse.

that one is actually just a guy sucking at measurement setting the scale. It was *supposed* to be body temperature at 100, but he got it wrong.

No. 98.6 F is 37 C. Exactly. 100.4 F is 38 C. Exactly. The body temperature definitions are not so precise they require a decimal place in Fahrenheit. Normal body temp is just defined as 37 ± 1 C. It's simply a rough measurement in a less granular scale. It's *very* imprecise.

I know a translation of the bible that for example renders "144 cubits" as "65 meters," when it's clear that 144 is symbolically 12 times 12, as in the 12 tribes of Israel or the 12 apostles or any of the other things that come in twelves, and not a literal length.

The rough part is that the definition of "fathom" is historically variable. "2 English yards" (currently 1.8288 m) was only the standard adopted in places that actually used English yards, and you'll find different historical definitions in continental Europe.

It can be entertaining reading American science reporting for this. You can often back-calculate from the imperial value given to the original metric value and units, and see how far that is from the metric value that is in the article.

Always wondered why the volumes of sodas were so specific (237 ml, 355 ml, 473 ml, 591 ml, 710 ml). It's only recently I realised they're conversions from 8 oz, 12 oz, 16 oz, 20 oz and 24 oz respectively

<Record scratch> That's me, on my eighth hour of running back and forth between the factory titration burettes and the weight room as Coca Cola forces me to fill soda cans to three sigfigs. And, shit, I forgot to account for the glass deformation in my burette again. KMN. Please. 😭

Like when they converted "old money - 240 pence to the Irish pound) to new money (decimal - 100 pence per pound), and then decades later pounds to euros (which became Irish currency). Older folk doing double mental calculations to see the price in "old money". €50 being equivalent to £39 - 7s - 7d

A long time ago, I was watching an American movie in a Paris theater and a character said, “Oh, come on. He was off by a mile!” The French subtitle duly said, “He was off by 1,609 meters!” I think the subtitlist was having fun

At one point I worked at a prominent museum, and there was a sign that had said something close to "Over 30 tons (900 kg)" because someone had evidently forgotten to do a conversion

I wrote something recently “it’s about 500 metres to the path and about a half a mile to the carpark” because ‘about 800m’ is too exact. (In Australia we know both metric and imperial and often switch between them.)

This is a pet peeve; accurately converting with high precision units that originally were obviously and brutally rounded off. "The Voyager 1 space probe is currently 25749504294736 meters from Earth".

My first collision with this was years ago, reading a reference to a paper that reported certain wildlife behaviors at -17.8, -15, and -12.2 C.

I still remember a question that was basically this from a frosh physics quiz after the unit on unit conversions, more than 30 years later: Assuming warp X is X times the speed of light, how fast does the Enterprise go in furlongs per fortnight when Kirk says "Warp 2"?

As a Spanish speaker, I have to do this all the time when watching dubs - they typically convert any imperial measurements to metric, but when the original line approximates a distance for example, the dub converts it to an uncannily precise one, ruining the immersion

wait, now I’m skeptical. where does 98.6 come in from Mr (and Mrs) F? Isn’t it just that the empirical average is 37C which we convert with improper precision to 98.6? If his wife hadn’t had a fever we would call it 100, right?

Fahrenheit pegged 0 on the scale using a mixture that would retain an independent equilibrium temperature. The approximate human body temp was 96 degrees based on this scale and the scale was revised 2 years later to round out water's freezing point, which put the human body at 98.6 degrees.

Fun fact! This has nothing to do with why 98.6 is the "average body temperature" designation. It's because the man who invented Fahrenheit's upper limit(100) based it specifically on measurements of average human temperature, and he averaged his wife's temperatures at hotspots(mouth/armpit) for it.

It's more interesting with the full history. Thermometers were once inaccurate, unreliable, and cumbersome. Fahrenheit didn't use freezing & boiling water because until the accurate, reliable mercury thermometer he invented, *we did not know about the latent heat of fusion and vaporization*.

We used to think boiling water just kept getting hotter, and freezing water just kept getting colder. It took the invention of Fahrenheit's thermometer and the scale he created for it to figure out how heat works well enough to make a better scale. That's why the F scale is so weird.

So, Mr Fahrenheit was even more wrong than the German doctor who came up with 37 degrees as normal body temperature. It was based on measurements of numerous people, but in a pre-antibiotic era, where lots of "healthy" people had ongoing light bacterial infections. It's 36-36,5 in recent studies.

I always thought that since he anchored the scale with 100 as normal wife body temp, that zero should have been frozen wife. But brine was probably experimentally more practical.

There once was a Marine quoted in a US newspaper: "When the vehicle was 229.6587926509 ft away, I opened fire, as per regulations." (Say what you will about the US Armed Forces, they ARE metric. And write dates correctly.)