Post

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Charlie Kirk wasn’t a good dude, but I condemn his assassination for three reasons. 1. Murder is immoral (duh) 2. Kirk’s death it doesn’t actually solve any problems. 3. It would have hurt Kirk a lot more to see his ambitions thwarted while he was alive.

There is absolutely no evidence that a groyper killed Kirk, and to say it like it's a given fact is extremely dishonest and gross.

0 reposts0 likes

Literally never said that. Are you trying to imply that Nick Fuentes shot Kirk? Because there's really no other way to read your comment unless you're just strawmanning (you are, but will you admit it?)

Do you have direct evidence that shows that the shooter not only identified as a groyper, but followed Nick? Btw I saw someone here claim he dressed up as pepe the frog which I haven't seen anything that corroborates that after looking.