Post

I've started to notice that many of the most "critical"/"skeptical"/"practical" takes on AI are so steeped in pro-AI framing that they immediately give away the plot. They can't say a sideways word without first rolling out platitudes as if to calm the pro-AI before the mildest take.

The problem is that this framing grants these platitudes validity. "AI is here to stay, but...", "AI is changing [x] industry...", "AI is useful in [x] context" & so on and it's so tired and contrite that we're bought into the framing. Most recently I saw "AI amplifies what's already there"...

"AI is changing the way we work", why? How? And for who's fucking benefit? Because the work output sucks and y'all are mostly just firing people so who the fuck asked for this?

it certainly changed the number of security bugs being found and patched in recent Chrome releases:

& we're right back inside the frame. 😔

We lost the fuckin plot and ceded too much ground because it seems like we're unable to effectively argue against the very existence of frontier LLMs. The capitalists don't give a shit about water, power, productivity, or any of that shit. If we're fighting within their frame we're losing everytime.

Like they're totally fine letting these things literally talk people into killing themselves and you think we're going to put a dent in it by talking about the fucking impact it has on the planet? You lost before you opened your mouth.

LLMs are economically unsustainable, the only two frontier AI companies are yet to turn profit, and Google even went cash-negative in one month. sure, we will have open models, e.g. DeepSeek, left as an artifact of the era, but they will become irrelevant without expensive retraining updates fast