Post

I've started to notice that many of the most "critical"/"skeptical"/"practical" takes on AI are so steeped in pro-AI framing that they immediately give away the plot. They can't say a sideways word without first rolling out platitudes as if to calm the pro-AI before the mildest take.

2 reposts36 likes

The problem is that this framing grants these platitudes validity. "AI is here to stay, but...", "AI is changing [x] industry...", "AI is useful in [x] context" & so on and it's so tired and contrite that we're bought into the framing. Most recently I saw "AI amplifies what's already there"...

That last one reads like a sleek way to claim both sides. "If you get a good result, it's because you're an expert! If you get a bad result, it must've been bad to begin with. Can't blame AI for that!" Like amplifying bad patterns is somehow neutral, b/c it could've been good (excluding the world)

And I can't help but just bark at that. Because what the fuck do you mean, amplified? It's a mediocrity machine at best, so what it adds is more *slop*. I suppose if you're already slinging slop it looks multiplicative instead of additive.

"AI is changing the way we work", why? How? And for who's fucking benefit? Because the work output sucks and y'all are mostly just firing people so who the fuck asked for this?

We lost the fuckin plot and ceded too much ground because it seems like we're unable to effectively argue against the very existence of frontier LLMs. The capitalists don't give a shit about water, power, productivity, or any of that shit. If we're fighting within their frame we're losing everytime.

It’s honestly really hard to not fall in the AI trap.. and I for one am definitely guilty of just giving in. And that’s hard because I want to make things with my own hands and some things I absolutely can. It unfortunately has made it too easy to just “make something” and that placates the brain…

I’ve said it once, I’ll say it a million times, the biggest problem with AI is that it works. Right now it’s motor cars 2.0: with a vengeance, and I fell so quickly from being vehemently against it in every capacity to a full-blown addict 😭

It works but I also spend 80% of my time turning something that works into something that isn't a sprawling confusing mess. Believe me, I love it and respect it and appreciate it! Still a huge help! But also!

Oh that’s very much a thing too. If you care about the output and its future at all you’re probably in for as much work as just hand writing it. In the good ol’ days we got similar results slower by outsourcing 🤣

I think above all else the second order effects of having kids and young people exposed to the “no need to use your brain” machine will be the most enduring of all the problems. We’re only just coming to terms with how much damage social media did.

I worry for the interns we’re getting where I work because it isn’t like we’re shipping a widget. It’s stuff that has real life consequences, and the general idea from execs is “pour everything you have into using AI to fix this stuff” and it’s going to be disastrous.

It’s way to easy to just be like “yup, I’ve wanted to do this for a long time, I have 0 mental bandwidth, Claude go ahead and implement my vision.” And the exhaustion of doing everything else makes you more susceptible to accepting code that is just okay. I have too many projects of just okay code.

It’s very much the magic wish granting machine for programming, and if we don’t achknowledge that it actually can work then any arguments against it are from a fundamentally different reality than that of those who’ve bought in/become addicted.

And I think that just grinds people down to thinking “what’s the point of fighting” but you’re absolutely right that it isn’t for everything and we should not be making it for everything.