Post

This is deeply disingenuous and, frankly, a dereliction of journalistic integrity. A quick glance at Yum! Brand’s annual filings reveal that this is common language included every single year as an investment risk factor. The most recent filing is no different because the risk is always present.

644 reposts2.6K likes

From having worked in the food industry it does seem like Taco Bell took action long before USDA did fuckall about it, and they should have been the vanguard on figuring out the disease vector. The Bell is well aware of the brand damage that can happen from something like this.

Same reason people blamed Jack In The Box and not their meat supplier (Vons) for the 1993 E Coli incident: People didn't know or care where the meat from the burgers purchased at Jack In the Box came from. The only care that Jack In The Box burgers made them sick.

Although, the difference with JntB is that because they followed the (at the time) Fed min temperature standards they didn't kill the E Coli that Vons supplied them. If they had followed the State specific standards they were supposed to, but didn't, Vons' E Coli infected meat would have been OK.

All good points, but I specifically do think this case warrants some attention because A) obviously people will pay attention to the bigger name, but we should all know better now and B) other restaurants are affected, not just TB. The focus seems almost very intentional.

"didn't follow state standards they were supposed to follow" sounds like a good reason to blame JntB for the outbreak to me. 🤷 Maybe Vons fucked up too and should get more blame, but that doesn't let JntB off the hook.

Granted, my experience is in medical and pharma, but "its our supplier's fault" reveals that you have a problem with incoming inspection, risk mitigation and supplier qualification. (Not that I am making a judgement on this specific issue)

As a designer I’ve worked on the annual report of a large financial institution, and the “risk factors” section includes basically everything that could go wrong in the entire world

"Reporter" is a misnomer to be honest. Forbes has been especially a blog site for a long time now, it's got all the prestige of Substack (but might still have less of a Nazi problem).

this is a common tactic in “science and health versus corporations” journalism, and it’s specifically used to freak people out and make them click while not technically lying not surprising to see from Forbes, Your Dad’s Clickbait Farm

Right. If you are involved in a car accident are you presumed guilty because you have auto liability insurance? But how could you expect the socialists at... Forbes...? to know how contracts and disclaimers work?