Post

In reviewing election results, at first my thought was that unless an incumbent pisses people off, they win. But the Morales campaign just went out and beat Smiley. Maybe Providence voters were pissed off but compared to what the voters thought of McKee, it didn't seem like much anger at Smiley.

0 reposts1 like

Smiley and McKee were unusual incumbents because they won their primaries in '22 with pluralities. In Smiley's case it was clear that the progressive vote was split. They both started their tenures 'in the hole' but they didn't do anything to climb out of it.

The responses to this sound like PVD voters were mad. So that makes more sense too. I wondered why incumbents like Matos won or my local state Senator. Maybe people didn't see a reason to kick them out. The power of incumbency is tough.

I think plenty of people were unhappy, but non-residents may not have picked up on it. Poorly handled snowstorms (it wasn't just the one), pulling back on quality of life improvements like traffic calming, school funding. He won in a 3-way race to begin with but didn't do much to win over new voters

I think the people who were angry at him don't garner coverage the way other constituencies do. But on the Palestinian flag, on bike lanes, on PVD Fest, on the Council homeless shelter, on the first police academy... he picked a lot of needless fights that did nothing to help his position in Prov.

That also seems to be what did in McKee. If in the week after the bridge closure, he went scorched Earth, fired the whole DOT, sued everyone, maybe he could have survived it. Hard to say.

you could make the paradoxical argument I think that a lot of PVD, outside the big stories, was a news desert. Projo had been cycling through different metro reporters for different years, and the PVD Eye only hired their first FT journo earlier this year

A related issue is an over reliance by news outlets to get their info from paid official spokespeople rather than talking to real people and community groups for their perspectives