Post

there was also a Stanford study that found that a surge in AI slop by lazy people actually created significantly more work for others who had to decipher and correct it this "I'm being efficient" (but not really) vibes well with the American obsession with artifice and appearing productive

techdirt.comStanford Study: ‘AI’ Generated ‘Workslop’ Actually Making Productivity WorseAutomation undeniably has some useful applications. But the folks hyping modern “AI” have not only dramatically overstated its capabilities, many of them generally view these tools as a…
Dave Jamieson@jamieson.bsky.social

AI Isn’t Lightening Workloads. It’s Making Them More Intense.: "It’s not that AI doesn’t create efficiency. It’s that the capacity it frees up immediately gets repurposed into doing other work, and that’s where the creep is likely to happen." www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-i...

661 reposts2K likes

this has happened with literally every efficiency increasing technology in modern history, maybe ever, so it's exactly what everyone should have expected tbh

I spent many years in NYC corporate legal IT and got a very intimate education on illusory productivity. Meetings where you walked out knowing less than you did when you walked in. People paid gobs of money for efficiency improvements that didn't improve efficiency. AI is an accelerant for that.

not to say that there aren't efficiency improvements had through automation, but terrible people layering half-cooked automation onto already broken workflows full of people obsessed with appearing productive in a country obsessed with artifice is going to have some curious outcomes

karlbode.comThe Problem With AI Is Shitty Human BeingsThe problem with AI isn't going to be Skynet. It's going to be amoral extraction class assholes applying half-cooked automation at scale onto deeply broken sectors in exploitative ways in a country t...

I've always been kind of obsessed with U.S. fake efficiency. U.S. corporate power especially models itself as a textbook efficient but it's mostly people wiggling their mouses and hosting purposeless meetings for hours on end to meet arbitrary metrics to no useful end. A country of artifice.

The execs at every company are obsessed with organizing yap sessions and are way more concerned with who they're yapping to than ever doing anything productive. LinkedIn lunatics try to go to 40 conferences a year.

That’s a good way to put it. Like, my county can’t afford a bus driver (evil govt spending), so 100 parents in cars line up for 45 minutes every morning and afternoon to drop off kids (free market!). I hunk a lot lately about how extractive private companies hate free efficient govt services.

Core artifice of this tech bubble: claiming non-intelligent algorithms are AI; a fallacy repeatedly reinforced by media. I continue to feel bad for the fictional character of HAL9000 used as illustration for today’s “AI“ discourse (his psychotic break was BECAUSE OF shitty people! See “2010”).

meeting phenomenon you mention reminds me of the same thing with some regulatory/legislative efforts to implement good ideas such as HIPPA (when it has just started being implemented I read the statute and then attended an implementation meeting; I came out knowing less). U can't have dialog w no 1

Copilot has told me that it's working on deliverables multiple times over the last week and a half and then just never delivers anything... And if you ask it about missed deadlines, it just sets new ones that it misses without comment.

It’s as though the oligarchs behind a climate killing scam for manipulating mental minority control over the masses don’t care about any consequences. bsky.app/profile/karl...

Karl Bode@karlbode.com

there was also a Stanford study that found that a surge in AI slop by lazy people actually created significantly more work for others who had to decipher and correct it this "I'm being efficient" (but not really) vibes well with the American obsession with artifice and appearing productive

It's rather like Ellison now owning all the imaginable different media outlets. Independent journalists, filmmakers, artists, and social media influencers are going to have to find the resources somewhere to make our own valid, creative, inspiring work to counteract the slop.

It's a lot easier for you to put something in my inbox than it is for me to respond to it. Slack intensifies this asymetry by making it easier still to generate work for the recipient (reading, responding) and by rewarding rapid responses. AI removes almost all costs on the sender.

My son is a graduate student at a well-known institution. His classmates submit nearly all papers using AI with little original thought or writing skill. And staff doesn’t push back. Our “best and brightest” minds are atrophying because of AI. This is a crisis.

this obsession with artifice is so seamlessly and perfectly aligned with the trajectory this country was already on the way out is through, I guess

As an attorney, I waste a ton of time responding to AI generated motions filed by pro se parties. It is often harder to respond to nonsense than to a well-written and thoughtful argument by a professional attorney.

“Efficient” has signaled intent more than held meaning for so long now, I view it like RWers trying to define woke or crt.

John@jdobry5122.bsky.social

This is great. "Efficient" has become my alert word that the speaker may not know what they are talking about. But "prior" and "update" are better

It’s almost like productivity always goes up and what’s going to make life better for the working class is collective bargaining and strong labor rights. 🤷‍♂️

It is genuinely hilarious that America is set up for everyone outside of healthcare to work 4 hours a day, 4 days a week, but we don't do that because everyone in the management class still believes in the myth of "Christian work ethic" that never existed, so people jiggle mouses 38 hours a week.

can confirm, i had a client as a copywriter where my whole job was to fix all the horrible AI copy that a previous agency forced on them with no warning, totally riddled with basic factual errors

that was the first experience CNET had when they tried to replace half their staff with AI It cost them more money to hire human editors to fix all the fake quotes and plagiarism. I assume it's improved some in two years, but still.

The biggest thing in seeing is an assumption that people should be more efficient when using AI, regardless of whether any empirical data or experience supports that. So people who use AI are given more work under the assumption that they can do everything faster when they can't yet (if ever).

This tracks with most of my workday for the last year becoming wading through documents people clearly generated and didn’t read, pointing out all the obvious mistakes

It’s the AI corollary of Dunning-Kruger: if you are satisfied by AI output and believe it’s making you efficient, you lack the competence to determine what is and isn’t slop in the first place, but have enough confidence to think you’re better than all the people having to clean up after you.