Post

These interviews that parrot the nonsense about AI's inevitability are disheartening. Especially when it's people in STEM fields. So much advancement in software devo came from humanities majors, and it's becoming obvious why that's true.

I don't think this fits into a humanities versus STEM us vs. them. This is more about MBAs vs academics. The AI, as an LLM, doesn't know math and will alter formulas and technical terms that shouldn't be altered. All to justify laying off the copy editor.

Again & again these so-called “computer science” people and their so-called “AI” show us that they’re really just a variation of indoctrinated cultists trying to spread a mythical product for their own self-enrichment. The product isn’t a tool but to make money selling it to credulous believers.

Andy Mabbett@pigsonthewing.org.uk

Not only do T&F expect individuals without institutional access to pay an extortionate £45 to *rent* this short (14 page) paper for just 48 hours, they expect *another* £45 if such customers want to rent the single-page addendum which corrects it. www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....