Post

It is dangerously naive to believe that cruelty can be directed only towards the guilty. An appetite for cruelty is equally sated by the victimization of innocents. There’s no reason that a straightforward prosecution of the administration’s crimes would be inferior to performative cruelty.

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com

imagine a future where *we* appropriate the vicious symbolism of ICE in a merciless crack-down billionaires and the MAGA class: fancy production value videos of bashing down their fancy doors, slapping bags over their spray-tanned heads, black helicopters, shattered ugly gold homewares, etc etc

I’ve reported on war crimes tribunals, I spend most of my time documenting war crimes, and I think you’re the naive one if you believe we can break the will of these depraved beasts without extremely public and entirely legal consequences for their genocidal crimes.

I think I started where Carl is and have ended up where you are, or in the approximate neighborhood. I feel kind of awful about it, but I feel much more awful about them escaping justice, etc..

I have come to where I am after a whole lot of confronting human brutality and its consequences. I feel this is by far the least bad choice on the table now.

2 reposts34 likes

If you still believe that the evil and cruel among us require any sort of action on our part to justify their evil and cruelty, then you haven't been paying attention.

Disagree with Faine as you will, but don't talk as if the Musks and Trumps of the world need the excuse of our behavior to be awful. That just saps our ability to do anything.

I am a serious advocate for nonviolent resistance as it is indeed more effective for protest movements than the alternative. That is not what we’re talking about here.

I have studied nonviolent resistance in great detail, and I spend most of my time professionally documenting global war crimes. I believe I am right and you are wrong.

Besides, this approach is still the far more moderate, gentle, "let bygones be bygones" position: if we're denied any and all "civilized"/legal frameworks to punish these monsters, there's not a ton of distance to the point where the "épuration sauvage" option starts looking good to people.

Regardless of the level of harm, they have to be totally and utterly humiliated. I have to believe you can break the spine of a fascist movement without lawlessness/brutality or we're just going to get a different form of authoritarianism.

Faine Greenwood@faineg.com

I am extremely familiar with the history of the Khmer Rouge and the Cultural Revolution. I am describing a highly public and perfectly legal process that will allow these criminals to live out their natural lives - mercy they likely won’t get if they continue their oligarchic reign of terror.

I am not dying on the black bags hill, but there’s a lot of other stuff that is legal (and probably shouldn’t be, but we can illegalize it after we crush the pigs).