Post

Dems are unfortunately addicted to high priced consultants, usually the same ones each cycle regardless of results, just another thing the party needs to break itself of and use those funds to fight everywhere possible. Also, working for a PAC sure does pay well.

I 100% agree.

Thank you. Send this directly to Hogg and hope he reads it. If he slows, he can see that he CAN win a race,perhaps state rather than Fed, but win something. He could run a district very well AND keep being a spokesman. So both can be done.

Great work Charles!

The DNC isn't a PAC & mainly operates the presidential primary & convention.

📌

They spent ~$450,000 on direct mail, though I don't know if that was to help elect candidates or marketing for themselves. They spent ~$1.7 million on "digital ads"...again, I don't know if those are ads for candidates or for themselves.

People like to shit on consultants and it is warranted at times but they are often necessary, particularly if you don’t know how to do something or simply don’t have the bandwidth. I would not want to chance screwing up an FEC filing so it makes sense to pay for someone knows what they are doing.

Did any of the supported candidates win? I see Carranza did not?

If on IS, that's incorrect way of reporting, all expenses should be dispursed to the proper expense line. If on the BS, the line should be zero, used as a pass through account to be disbursed. I'm not going to go into debits and credits here, but it's another thing that's weird and could 2/

The 1.2M was wasted on Kristen Carrenza because she lost. That's not something to brag about, yet Hogg's fans think he is the savior of the Democratic Party.

Based on this it's clear you'd make a better Vice Chair than Hogg. You raise more money and don't grift off the top.

THANK YOU AS ALWAYS

Act Blue takes 4%. That’s…not that much?

Sorry I was upset about the wrong thing. Lesson learned.

📌

📌

@technomagius.bsky.social

You’re the best Charles. Thank you for all the thorough work you did.