Yoel Roth

Yoel Roth

@yoyoel.com

Internet sanitation enthusiast and full-time corgi wrangler.

79.8K followers258 following841 posts

Yoel Roth reposted

Replying to @yoyoel.com

Wrote about what this means for two-party consent states: bsky.app/profile/nata...

Natalie Lung@natalielung.com

NEW: Will the Apple Watch’s new always-listening features be illegal in states that require all parties’ consent for recording? Attorneys in CA, MA, PA and WA aren’t convinced that Apple’s privacy protections will sufficiently shield users from legal problems. www.bloomberg.com/news/article...

*screaming internally in HIPAA*

Yoel Roth@yoyoel.com

Apple quietly dropped a ton of detail about the Apple Watch’s new always-on don’t-call-it-transcription feature and it is FASCINATING. support.apple.com/en-us/148354

Ok but more seriously: (1) I am confident Apple’s MANY excellent lawyers and privacy engineering people have thought about this; and (2) I don’t understand how it is possible Protected Health Information doesn’t end up in Siri Recaps if you have this enabled.

I asked Claude to generate a book jacket blurb for a novel inspired by Heated Rivalry and the Lumen database, and, umm…

I appreciate the forthright acknowledgement of the mistake from the author, and look forward to decisive action by @princetonupress.bsky.social to correct this error, and any others, that made it past their robust editorial process.

Yoel Roth@yoyoel.com

Requested a correction from @princetonupress.bsky.social. Let's see what happens.

I still can’t wrap my head around how this could have happened in any reasonable research and writing process. Like, I’ve written lots of stuff; I always start by bucketing sources into “agrees with/supports the point I’m making” and “disagrees with it.” How do you accidentally mix those up?

Anyway, Brandolini’s law continues to hold: Bullshit is asymmetrical. Editorial failures like this put the burden on me to track how even purportedly scholarly works (mis)use what I’ve said and written, and expend time and effort to set the record straight. It’s untenable in the long run.

Requested a correction from @princetonupress.bsky.social. Let's see what happens.

Yoel Roth@yoyoel.com

A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty: My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media. Huh? When did I say that?!

A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty: My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media. Huh? When did I say that?!

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

This is genuinely horrifying. Fact-free far-right agitprop given accolades by credible media across the political spectrum.

View full thread

And yet, In Covid’s Wake quotes me as saying that “the FBI went beyond strategic information sharing and made direct moderation demands” — literally the opposite of what I argue — to buttress their claim that the government was too busy censoring speech to adequately deal with the pandemic.

There’s a lesson here about writing in the age of weaponized lies: Always precede false claims with giant red text, ideally wrapped in a <blink> tag, that says “THIS IS A LIE I AM REFUTING!!” But also, why is a book that makes this kind of lazy, bad-faith argumentation getting any accolades at all?

A small (personal) example of this book’s intellectual dishonesty: My father-in-law is reading In Covid’s Wake, and excitedly told me he found a passage where I’m quoted. The quote in question is me saying the FBI worked to censor speech on social media. Huh? When did I say that?!

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

This is genuinely horrifying. Fact-free far-right agitprop given accolades by credible media across the political spectrum.

One such refutation appears in my paper under the heading “The FBI went beyond strategic information sharing and made direct moderation demands.” I spend several hundred words explaining that that didn’t happen.

Yoel Roth reposted

@yoyoel.com at TrustCon making the key point that big platforms can weather storms and absorb blows (litigation, regulatory churn) that kill their smaller rivals. The legal threat may look the same to an array of platforms, but the real question is who can survive it.

This is an extraordinary and courageous piece of writing that wrestles with one of the great challenges of this moment: How do you decide whether to remain a part of broken institutions to try to fix them from within?

This post is unavailable.

Yoel Roth reposted

Genuinely baffled by the unempirical assertion that Community Notes “works.” Does it? How do Meta know? The best available research is pretty mixed on this point. And as they go all-in on an unproven concept, will Meta commit to publicly releasing data so people can actually study this?

Yoel Roth reposted

Community Notes don't work by themselves. So many things don't get labeled because people don't reach "consensus" on them, which is really what Community Notes optimize for, not factuality What an utter failure. So disappointing

Brian Stelter@brianstelter.bsky.social

"We're going to get rid of fact-checkers and replace them with community notes, similar to X, starting in the U.S," Mark Zuckerberg announces He asserts that "the fact-checkers have just been too politically biased, and have destroyed more trust than they've created, especially in the U.S."

One of the things we all really need from platform T&S teams — honest, authentic, human conversations about the impossible tradeoffs involved in this work — is made effectively impossible by the deranged ways a small number of people treat platform staff when they speak publicly. Ask me how I know.

rahaeli@rahaeli.bsky.social

this shit is literally fucking unhinged and it is a perfect example of why every single head of T&S of every single fucking site ever rapidly stops using the site

Oh no, the Signal icon very subtly changed colors and now it’s setting off my “what is weird right now” alarms every time I unlock my phone

Yoel Roth reposted

Reminder for corporate folks: It’s oh-crap-I-haven’t-spent-my-annual-learning-stipend season — and most companies allow you to use your learning budget on newspaper/newsletter subscriptions. Good opportunity to support (and expand your access to) independent journalism.

Yoel Roth reposted

Yoel Roth reposted

Yoel Roth reposted

Should be a really interesting discussion. I'm moderating, but will have representatives from Bluesky, Threads & ActivityPub talking about decentralized moderation...

Samantha Lai@samlai.bsky.social

Very excited to attend the third annual Trust and Safety Research Conference hosted by the Stanford Internet Observatory, where I’ll be speaking on a panel about decentralized platforms and trust & safety with @evan.cosocial.ca.ap.brid.gy, @aaron.bsky.team, Liz Arcamona and @mmasnick.bsky.social!

Yoel Roth reposted

a brief guide to terms used in profiles for new site admins: * professional blogger = spammer * digital marketer = spammer * SEO expert = spammer * professional reviewer = spammer * affiliate marketer = spammer * marketing enthusiast = spammer * passionate about blogging = spammer

And if you think this is fun, I dare you to find a way to report abuse originating from a Google Voice number. (Spoiler: It doesn't exist!)

Yoel Roth@yoyoel.com

Just spent half an hour digging around Google's support pages to see if there's a form for reporting abuse originating from a Gmail account. Turns out — there is! Submitted a report of the weirdo who sends me very sexually graphic abuse every day. Genuinely curious if Google will do anything.

An especially happy Friday to Rye, who is doing a remarkably good job not eating Toast for lunch despite her constant barking and face-biting.

This is an incredible resource — and as someone who has unthinkingly paid DeleteMe for years, led me to sign up for Optery instead.

This post is unavailable.

Also, if you were affected by some Reddit data breach or another a few years back, you might be entitled to the expensive Optery subscription for free. (I was.) Search your email; I’d missed the notices the first few dozen times, apparently.