Nick Touran

Nick Touran

@whatisnuclear.com

Ph.D./P.E. nuclear engineer and nuclear educator who runs https://whatisnuclear.com. CTO at Ocean Atomics

2.6K followers1.4K following778 posts

Serious question to people who are protesting data centers: how would you feel if they were operated offshore? ⚛️Powered with sustainable nuclear ⛲Cooled with abundant seawater 🏠Not in anyone's backyard 🧑‍🔧Built in shipyards reindustrializing America 🇺🇸 Allows us to stay competitive internationally

What does "going critical" mean? If you shoot a neutron into some uranium ore, some atoms will split by fission, but you haven't made a nuclear reactor. Too many secondary neutrons leak out or get absorbed without splitting neighboring atoms. 1/n

View full thread

Of course, high-power critical for long periods of time is the hardest of all for these reasons. Powering a city of 1 million people requires splitting of about 100 quintillion atoms per second (100 billion billion).

What does "going critical" mean? If you shoot a neutron into some uranium ore, some atoms will split by fission, but you haven't made a nuclear reactor. Too many secondary neutrons leak out or get absorbed without splitting neighboring atoms. 1/n

View full thread

High-power critical is harder because you're splitting atoms faster. You must endure proportionally higher radiation fields, substantial thermal gradients, and you generate more radioactive byproducts, so the safety and decommissioning issues increase.

What does "going critical" mean? If you shoot a neutron into some uranium ore, some atoms will split by fission, but you haven't made a nuclear reactor. Too many secondary neutrons leak out or get absorbed without splitting neighboring atoms. 1/n

View full thread

Once you do enough of this, you can remove your neutron source and the reactor will keep on splitting atoms in steady state. Huge congrats: it's now critical!

You can run a reactor in a low-power critical state, with just a few billion fissions occurring per second, or you can pull the control rods for longer, go supercritical for a while, get the reaction rate way up, and then insert the rods again to go back to a higher-power critical steady state.

What does "going critical" mean? If you shoot a neutron into some uranium ore, some atoms will split by fission, but you haven't made a nuclear reactor. Too many secondary neutrons leak out or get absorbed without splitting neighboring atoms. 1/n

You have to put fuel atoms close together (spatially and often with enrichment), remove impurities that gobble neutrons, and often include a special neutron moderator material that substantially improves the neutron economy.

This Combustion Engineering facility in Chattanooga, TN fabricated 57 reactor pressure vessels for US reactors, plus more overseas, and lots of other heavy equipment. As the nuclear industry ramps back up in the US, I hope we see lots more facilities like this soon.

This is a 1969 AEC film describing the material, commercial applications, and the production process. (Title: "Atomic Revolution in Wood", AVN0481, Digitized by the IAEA's Lise Meitner Library. AVN0481) 📽️⚛️

The classic mouse trap and ping pong ball demo, from Martin Marietta. Only problem is that the mouse traps flying around set off other mouse traps, dramatically increasing keff. They should have glued them to the bottom. (VHS quality because, well, it was on VHS)

Micros are ideal for rapid iteration of advanced reactors, and may be the best pathway to find new starting points to scale up from. I have a slight scold in there for people who assert that their microreactors will compete in commodity power markets rather than novel ones. Did I miss any?

The Beetle, everyone's favorite actually-real mecha, inside and out. It was designed to do maintenance in the highly radioactive areas around nuclear-powered long-range bomber aircraft back in the nuclear-powered flight days.

I'm currently getting these historical nuclear films digitized. Standby! As far as I can tell, none of them exist online yet except the Accident Testing one, which shows the Sandia cask tests. I'm getting that one scanned with hopes that it'll be extra high quality for everyone's pleasure.

Here's what neutron chain reaction dynamics kinda look like. The green bar is control rod position and the trace shows reactor power, starting at 1. After each control adjustment, there is a 'prompt jump' followed by a longer exponential tail from delayed neutrons.

Man! I was at a workshop in my home state of Michigan on Thursday and we were brainstorming ideas to bring more nuclear power industry to the state. I mentioned that the Upper Peninsula has pretty good geology for a long-term nuclear waste repository (reducing environment, precambrian rock)....

Everyone absolutely freaked out. I know NIMBY is a thing, but it's good for us to be reminded of how visceral it is from time to time, even in totally pro-nuclear crowds.

Can't reply on the post for some reason... but after 3 years of shutdown it does not take that much cooling to keep the spent fuel cooled. Something like a garden hose of water going in should suffice. I'm not super worried about it.

umpft.bsky.social@umpft.bsky.social

@whatisnuclear.com @energybants.bsky.social What are the chances for a meltdown after years of cooling? Thanks!

Taking a Geiger counter on a flight with the sound on is a great way to get some serious side-eye from your neighbors, maybe leading to a good discussion about dose rate

It's a true miracle of nature that water is both a good neutron moderator and reactor coolant. Its ability to moderate and cool at the same time is quite underappreciated in today's pro-nuclear circles.

Pretty neat model of a PWR from the 1965 Boy Scouts Atomic Energy merit badge book. Honestly, building this would help kids understand quite a bit about a reactor.

Looking into the core of BORAX-5, which pushed the limits of what a BWR could do: nuclear superheat and natural circulation. The superheat region is in the center. BWRs today are not so bold as to superheat steam. Have materials improved enough to try again? Probably!