chip πŸ”’

chip πŸ”’

@wd.teleri.net

software engineer @ a big cloud. some techposting, some shitposting, videos james, taylor swift, you know, the usual smorgasbord @doubleyewdee or @wd many places (discord/reddit/elsewhere) periodic blogging @ https://etc.teleri.net

4.5K followers643 following8.2K posts

Pinned

"Go back?" he thought. "No good at all! Go sideways? Impossible! Go forward? Only thing to do! On we go!" So up he got, and trotted along with his little sword held in front of him and one hand feeling the wall, and his heart all of a patter and a pitter. -The Hobbit, Chapter 5.

This post is unavailable.

I don’t know if this is contentious, though it feels like it will be, but after a season and a bit of the new Rurouni Kenshin anime I’m ready to say it’s far superior to the 90s version

there is this little detail in the intro for season 2 that I love, where Kenshin and Kaoru are standing back to back and he is on the sharp side of his sword while she is on the blunt edge. then at the end of the intro he’s walking with one foot on each side. super basic imagery but it’s thoughtful

The original Candyman (1992) absolutely wrecked my shop. I was 10/11 when I saw it. I’d watched a bunch of the slasher fare on free HBO weekends but for whatever reason Candyman just got me. I still don’t feel good saying it in front of a mirror even once, let alone thrice.

Sleepy Hollow Reviews πŸŽƒπŸŽ@sleepingvillage.bsky.social

In honor of scary media month: what is the first piece of media you remember truly frightening you as a child?

I’m sure you can poke holes in this idea, but if your goal is to maximize productivity / output, then it behooves you to maximize engagement. People won’t engage in clearly rigged games. If the top of the ladder is unreachable, you’re just losing potential participants to apathy / disinterest

chip πŸ”’@wd.teleri.net

in gaming terms this is just a nerf. and we should nerf overpowered builds, so to speak. nerfing universally incentivizes people who keep playing to find new ways to succeed and find new ways to run up their score (ie β€œcreate economic value”). balance patches are good, taxes are just that

preventing massive disparity through taxation is just balancing. you want your audience to believe they have a credible path to the top of the leaderboard. in theory capitalism actually should do this through efficient markets etc, but that demands … well, balancing

the people who get nerfed are obviously pissed when you take their toys away, but they’re both a minority of both the current active player base , and even more so of potential players. you want to work harder to engage future participants! you already hooked the top players, they’re not quitting

for some reason I find myself watching Gargoyles yet again. this show was too good for its Disney afternoon slot. a ludicrous collection of voice talent, serialized drama in a sea of episodic media. an audacious four episode series open. I don’t know how they got away with it but I’m glad they did

this show has been well-dissected by others and I won’t do it justice, but being able to get a 52 episode runway really let them cook in a way you don’t see much of anymore, and that’s a shame. it was a gateway for mythology and literature for kids who got sucked in unlike any of its contemporaries

Blizzard appears to have COOKED with Diablo IV season 15. I would like to not be on constant escalations/bridges so I can spend more time with this. Claude, rewrite our infrastructure. Make no mistakes. 🫠

it feels inevitable that more compliance requirements (and expensive auditing) will continue appearing to prove SBOM-but-for-AI for critical sectors. US gov (and plausibly EU tbh) will basically ban Chinese model use for critical work

that paid-for lead and cost honestly doesn’t feel unreasonable by default, if you’re doing like line of business apps or you’re an IT shop you can be behind a bit but pay-for-premium is hardly novel and some people likely benefit. cost doesn’t sound outrageous on its face

Yes, especially when I’m rapid posting and fuck up. However, there’s this part of me that thinks it’s better if we just own our errors and have to correct in a follow up. Using IRC more again has made me cognizant of how much I rely on fast-editing my messages instead of … stopping and thinking.

Robin Berjon@robin.berjon.com

Hello β€” have you ever wanted to edit your posts?

Modern messaging has totally broken my brain, in terms of composition. I’ll forget on IRC that *nobody knows it took me five minutes to compose a reply* because there’s no typing……. indicator. When I do recall this, it’s freeing.

I think post edits and revision history are probably the right thing for users. There’s a reason I like these things in other platforms. It promotes a looseness that a place like bsky should embrace. But it’s not a no-brainer value-add, even though it feels like it

my work continues giving me infinite tokens for, well, work. it "feels good" to use the most powerful available machinery for every task, but as the sudden onset of "tokenomics" is hitting people, for my own personal use on small codebases I genuinely think Opus (or comparable) is mostly overkill

chip πŸ”’@wd.teleri.net

genuinely sonnet 4.6 for internet search, and low-stakes coding in small projects/blitting out toy scripts. opus 4.7/4.8 if you're done caring about tokens for a while or on the turbo $$ subscription. verbose custom prompts and a littany of skills/etc are a terrible trap, be judicious here

View full thread

also, model release cadence continues to be stupid fast. reassess new models with baseline behavior. no accumulated user config, no pile of skills, no honed instructions. try "unburdened by context" tasks with model+1/model+2 revs if you have the time. discard now-superfluous instructions

i had to give a whole-ass complex template to an older generation of models to explain "here's how you write sphinx w/o types python docstrings the way i want." but newer models can exist with just "sphinx without type decorations" as the directive and perform equivalently. many saved tokens.

my work continues giving me infinite tokens for, well, work. it "feels good" to use the most powerful available machinery for every task, but as the sudden onset of "tokenomics" is hitting people, for my own personal use on small codebases I genuinely think Opus (or comparable) is mostly overkill

chip πŸ”’@wd.teleri.net

genuinely sonnet 4.6 for internet search, and low-stakes coding in small projects/blitting out toy scripts. opus 4.7/4.8 if you're done caring about tokens for a while or on the turbo $$ subscription. verbose custom prompts and a littany of skills/etc are a terrible trap, be judicious here

View full thread

just from personal experience/trials, i've found that avoiding compaction/compression is broadly positive. the easiest way to do that is to not burden *every new model prompt* with superfluous (and distracting!) instructions, skills, etc that may not be relevant to the task at hand

tokens feel analogous for me to low memory in the DOS days. a scarce resource that needs careful consideration and management. prefer to bring tokens in knowingly. if you have a bundle of included instructions on writing great docs, but you're vibing Python code, how are those helping? they're not

my work continues giving me infinite tokens for, well, work. it "feels good" to use the most powerful available machinery for every task, but as the sudden onset of "tokenomics" is hitting people, for my own personal use on small codebases I genuinely think Opus (or comparable) is mostly overkill

chip πŸ”’@wd.teleri.net

genuinely sonnet 4.6 for internet search, and low-stakes coding in small projects/blitting out toy scripts. opus 4.7/4.8 if you're done caring about tokens for a while or on the turbo $$ subscription. verbose custom prompts and a littany of skills/etc are a terrible trap, be judicious here

DO: use `<FOO>.md` instructions (claude, agents, whatever) *judiciously*. DO: structure these as discrete skills, or in subfolders, for large projects DO NOT: feel like if you do `/context` and you've blown 25-30% of your token window before you type the first prompt that it's nbd

The book itself is quite modern but doesn’t seem to contemplate the impact of naming on LLM assisted coding, which I suspect (free of evidence) matters *more* than it does with humans, who are far more adaptable.

i don't want to undersell how much naming matters to us fleshbags, but in the current market it seems convenient to also frame naming as a critical concern for working with LLMs. which, again, ancedotally care deeply about names. golang dev guidance (should be) in shambles here, e.g.

i know i do not post enough these days but just wanted to check in and ask an important question ... is it just me or is the discord 'wink' emoji kinda... weirdly horny-looking?

this isn't meant to be a review series, but the Teams (really, Skype) wink emoji is decidedly unhorny. what it *is*, is clearly tweaked the fuck out on adderrall or something

also in 🍎🎢 they have lightly animated the album cover so like, sometimes john or whoever is blinking. i love this "feature" in new albums (taylor of course uses this well) but i do not like it here. i was not asking for harry potter-ization of still album art, i guess. also, get off my lawn

alright i went back to my older copy of Revolver and the yawn is absolutely in there and i just never noticed it because it was way more subtle. i don't like this change, and why are you still on my lawn

for fun (and as a leetcode-esque exercise) i wrote a wordle solver that would do a given wordle using a provided dictionary of five letter word candidates, determining the frequency of letters and optimal next move given the state of the board coincidentally, that was the last time i played wordle

Post Sports @postsports.bsky.social

The NFL and the NHL have only been made more entertaining by the increased use of analytics. But some say that in the age of automation, all games are at risk.

not to say that exploring the solutions to complex problems isn't fun (it's... my whole dumb job, and what's kept me off bsky for quite a while!), but once you've had that bit of fun solving, you've also lost the magic of unpredictability. this makes quantum uncertainty very comforting for me

every time I click the little 'remember me' box on a login page I hear in my head a planet-scale statue of Bender screaming 'REMEMBER ME' into the unfeeling void of space happy monday or whatever ig