Pinned
I bought the domain to match its predecessor so you can now access HTTP Golden Girls at www.goldengirls.codes
Sue Smith
@suesmith.lol
🤡 Lefty Glaswegian smartarse 🎏 Helps folk learn how to code 💅🏻 Still petty after cancer https://www.suesmith.dev
656 followers319 following2.9K posts
Pinned
I bought the domain to match its predecessor so you can now access HTTP Golden Girls at www.goldengirls.codes
A (mostly) non-cancer related post on my cancer blog www.clearmargins.blog/posts/still-...
This is a valuable direction for developer learning too, for example the Raspberry Pi PRIMM model starts by having learners guess what the code is going to do
My big one is banning Claude from writing comments (it puts in TODO markers instead). Being made to explain things makes me find a shocking number of issues
I've been wondering to what extent the NHS' historical failure to connect its many systems and create centralised access to data might be a saving grace rn, as individual bodies could potentially prevent palantir getting their hands on at least some of it www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
Tech companies refusing to train folk to acquire the skills they need on is nothing new but the seemingly objective tone with which anthropic reports on their own behaviour is wild, accountability / liability management I guess but there's a level of nihilism in it that's.. strange
Anthropic report on how AI is changing employment at the startup: decline of entry-level technical hiring, productivity boom across departments, and more (Anthropic) Main Link | Techmeme Permalink
Sue Smith reposted
I need to find about ~£10k for @protect.earth before I can get out of bed. Our calls with main funding partner yesterday show they’re not going to be our lifeline. They’re unable to sponsor any trees because £5 is “too expensive” but that’s literally how much it costs. Projects will be scrapped.
Sue Smith reposted
I got that question on a podcast this week and I have a stock response from a year ago, but this time I just wouldn’t acknowledge the question. We don’t compare tools to people, it’s not how we evaluate tools. A rock is better at hammering a nail than my hands, it’s still a crappy hammer.
"Humans make mistakes so errors introduced by GenAI are irrelevant" is certainly a take.