Spotlight on Corruption

Spotlight on Corruption

@spotlightcorruption.org

Shining a light on the UK's role in corruption at home and abroad https://linktr.ee/endcorruptionuk

24.3K followers832 following1.9K posts

🚨 Our new report, Zoned Out, is featured in the Guardian today, revealing how the government’s plans for AI data centres have been shaped overwhelmingly by industry, with little input from the communities affected. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

theguardian.comUK government met 137 businesses over AI datacentres – but no environmental groupsInvestigation finds dozens of ministers and civil servants moved into AI roles as government developed datacentre expansion plans

Our investigation found ministers met 137 businesses but just two community groups, and no environmental NGOs. We also identified 38 ministers, special advisers, and senior civil servants moving into jobs at AI companies.

The environmental stakes are significant, too. If data centres treble in number as the government intends, they could consume as much water each day as 60,000 homes. Yet the people and communities affected have had little say in these decisions.

Our report calls for: - Proper public consultation and meaningful community involvement. - Greater transparency over access to government and industry secondments. - Stronger environmental standards and reporting. - Action to tackle the revolving door between government and the AI industry.

Between July 2024 and June 2026: - 84% of ministerial meetings about data centres were with businesses or private-sector trade associations. - Ministers met just TWO community groups. - Ministers and senior civil servants met ZERO environmental NGOs.

Permanent secretaries and directors general held no meetings with community groups. Meanwhile, 38 ministers and senior civil servants were hired by AI companies over the same period. There has been no national public consultation on AI Growth Zones or data centres.

📢 Spotlight’s @kamilakingstone.bsky.social will be speaking at ‘USE YOUR VOICE’ about the need for greater transparency about who is lobbying our politicians TOMORROW EVENING. 📌 Thur 22 Oct, 6.30pm Kensington Library 💥 Book your FREE place...

eventbrite.co.ukUSE YOUR VOICE - Government Transparency and Accountability - ONLINEJoin the fourth session in a series of informative meetings - learn how transparency can help people hold government accountable.

The UK Supreme Court will decide whether to let the Solicitors Regulation Authority argue that it has the power to compel the disclosure of legally privileged information. 👀 Read our analysis of the High Court’s decision to get up to speed 👇

spotlightcorruption.orgHigh Court ruling exposes major gap in powers to investigate misconduct by lawyersThe High Court rules against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) following a major challenge by Carter-Ruck and Mohamed Amersi to the regulator’s investigative powers.
View full thread

🎯 The EIC’s letter tells the Prime Minister that “your personal leadership is needed”. We couldn’t agree more. A culture of political integrity must come from the top. The Prime Minister has said he wants to do politics differently; taking these steps would be a clear way to prove that.

View full thread

3. Political donation caps: The EIC recognises that reliance on large donations from a limited number of sources risks undue influence and damages trust in politics. The government should use the Representation of the People Bill to introduce a donation cap.

View full thread

2. This is an important step towards implementing the recommendations of the Fisher review, and could help transform white collar crime enforcement in the UK. Over three years ago we called for a review of the options so we’re delighted to see this finally being taken forward:

spotlightcorruption.orgTime for a rethink on whistleblower compensation in the UK to fight economic crime? - Spotlight on CorruptionAs experts and parliamentarians gather to mark this week’s Whistleblower Awareness Week, is it time to talk seriously however about the elephant in the room –
View full thread

7. Its implications could reach across global supply chains, as well as the wider credibility of voluntary certification schemes designed to address corruption, environmental harm and human rights risks.

View full thread

6. This six-week trial will have implications that go far beyond the gold market: where does accountability lie when certification schemes are relied on to assure markets that products are ethically sourced?

View full thread

3. The challenge has been brought by the families of two Tanzanian men who died at the North Mara gold mine in 2019. Their families allege that the men were killed by security forces guarding the mine.

📢 Spotlight’s @kamilakingstone.bsky.social will be speaking at ‘USE YOUR VOICE’ later this month, about the need for greater transparency about who is lobbying our politicians. 📌 Details: Thur 22nd Oct, 6.30pm Kensington Library 👥 Join online or in person. 💥 Book your FREE place:

eventbrite.comUSE YOUR VOICE - IN PERSON & ONLINE by Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Libraries | EventbriteLearn how to influence political decisions and become an active citizen. Join the first session of a series of informative conversations.

⚖️ On Monday the High Court ruled that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) does not have the statutory power to compel disclosure of legally privileged material when investigating alleged professional misconduct. Our latest blog looks at the implications of this major ruling.

spotlightcorruption.orgHigh Court ruling exposes major gap in powers to investigate misconduct by lawyersThe High Court rules against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) following a major challenge by Carter-Ruck and Mohamed Amersi to the regulator’s investigative powers.
View full thread

🛡️ The SRA is seeking permission to appeal. But the judgment also makes clear that it’s up to Parliament to decide whether regulators should have these powers - and put them beyond doubt, with proper safeguards for legal privilege.

⚖️ On Monday the High Court ruled that the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) does not have the statutory power to compel disclosure of legally privileged material when investigating alleged professional misconduct. Our latest blog looks at the implications of this major ruling.

spotlightcorruption.orgHigh Court ruling exposes major gap in powers to investigate misconduct by lawyersThe High Court rules against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) following a major challenge by Carter-Ruck and Mohamed Amersi to the regulator’s investigative powers.

𓂃🪶 The judgment turns on the wording of the legislation, but its implications are much wider. Without access to this material, the SRA faces a major gap in its ability to investigate potential wrongdoing by lawyers, including suspected anti-money laundering breaches and abusive litigation conduct.

View full thread
View full thread

3. The judge ruled that the legislation relied on by the SRA was not "compellingly clear" that privilege could be overridden by the SRA, and noted that it was ultimately for Parliament to decide whether it would be desirable for the legal regulator to have the power it has until now assumed.

4. This comes after London libel firm Carter-Ruck and their former client, businessman Mohamed Amersi, challenged the SRA, arguing that the legal regulator could not view legally privileged material without a waiver from the client who holds the privilege.