Nathan Holbert

Nathan Holbert

@snowdaylearninglab.org

Learning Scientist. Maker and designer. Player of games and toys. Dad. Associate Professor @ Teachers College, Columbia University. Pop & Play host http://tc.edu/popandplay

1.5K followers738 following3.7K posts

Pinned

New book incoming! Everybody has ideas about learning, but much of it is confusing, demoralizing, and flat out wrong. In How to Learn Anything we pull together research on cognition, play, and design to share how we can all create powerful, more meaningful spaces for learning. Coming soooon (ish)!

How does holding remote school on election day makes sense? Presumably the reason you make election day a holiday is to make it easier for people to go vote. Remote school means parents of young children have to be home for their kids. Maybe a bit easier for teachers -- cutting out commute times?

Nathan Holbert reposted

The more i see stuff like this from people heading projects the more i think that the ability to actually hit send on a work, warts and all, is a skill that is necessary lest the allure of "perfect" eat everything and everyone you love

John Michonski@john.gamesline.net

Reading this Famitsu interview Uchikoshi did and it seems that the reason the Crash Keys game was canceled was because *Uchikoshi* wanted to use AI, not the publisher. This snippet is driving me nuts. Makes all the posturing with Hundred Line read extremely shallow.

Nathan Holbert reposted

Replying to @snowdaylearninglab.org

Oh for sure. Plenty of people cosplaying learning sciences by adopting science of learning terminology. Just wanted to (re-)claim some ground for people trying to take a broader view. And also: sigh. Do we really have to re-litigate DI? Can people just read the discourse from 2006-7?

This thread inspired by reading posts on direct instruction while writing recommendation letters for my students who are doing genuinely innovative work that spans dance, engineering, AI, and play. The arrogance to suggest "cognitive science" proves none of that matters for learning boggles my mind!

Nathan Holbert@snowdaylearninglab.org

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

Nathan Holbert reposted

“It also means curriculum that is locally relevant (not universally scripted) matters. That community (teacher and other students) is a core part of learning -- not incidental or a distraction. DI is fine, but anyone telling you it's a magic bullet because "cognitive sciences" is selling something.🧵

Nathan Holbert@snowdaylearninglab.org

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

Nathan Holbert reposted

This is a great thread- not only does it bring back memories of grad school, but it also is a helpful reminder of how theories of how learning happens connect to theories of what schools are for.

Nathan Holbert@snowdaylearninglab.org

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

Nathan Holbert reposted

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

View full thread

That brings us back to "grounding in the cognitive sciences." Cognitivism and constructivism are great, but they're not the whole story. Sociocultural cognition tells us that care matters, the space and materials matter, that learner's prior experiences matter (for more than just motivation).

It also means curriculum that is locally relevant (not universally scripted) matters. That community (teacher and other students) is a core part of learning -- not incidental or a distraction. DI is fine, but anyone telling you it's a magic bullet because "cognitive sciences" is selling something.

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

View full thread

Here "transfer" is the wrong metaphor entirely. We don't develop an abstraction in our minds that we carry around. Rather, we build concrete understanding, situated in the learned context and grounded in our bodies. This knowledge is "activated" when the conditions are right.

Activation means that learning is not about abstraction, but concretion -- of building many relationships with ideas and practices, getting to know them from a wide range of perspectives and experiences. Learning is about meaning, about connection, through both mind and body.

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

View full thread

"Transfer" is the primary goal -- being able to take what you learn in one context and apply it in another. As I've said before, if this is the foundation of your theory, direct instruction, and "personalized" AI are natural pedagogical endpoints.

But we've come far since Piaget. Sociocultural theories of cognition recognize knowledge is tied to the body, as well as the social and physical environment. Learning emerges from interactions between the learner, tools, materials, others, and the culture (language, practices, norms) of the space.

"Science of learning" proponents often claim their proposals are more likely to be sound because they are grounded in the cognitive sciences. The truth is that they are committed to a very narrow set of cognitive theories, of which there are in fact many!

SoL folks are primarily cognitivists, with a dash of constructivism. They see the brain is a symbol-crunching machine best developed by repeated exposure to training. They agree that it is helpful if learners care about what they are learning, but mostly for motivation, a means to enable repetition.

Nathan Holbert reposted

Replying to @fasterandworse.com

prototyping isn't about *the prototype*, it's about the shit you have to go through to create a prototype that works

Nathan Holbert reposted

Congrats to Lula on overcoming Mark Zuckerberg and Donald Trump to defeat Hospital Pervert Jr., even as his opposition literally blocked off roads and turned off bus service during election day. Fascists are scary but they are always, 100% of the time, ultimately gigantic fucking losers.

You should think enough about your own child to have at LEAST three answers to why they are special. If you don’t, rather than brag about how you offloaded your care to an AI, please allow the soul-crushing embarrassment to motivate you to spend more time with your kid.

David Gura@davidgura.bsky.social

cool, cool

Nathan Holbert reposted

Replying to @tressiemcphd.bsky.social

I’m sure folks know this but you don’t need to know about dual cooling systems to know that you don’t want or need a data center in your community. Additionally, no, we don’t need a Black-owned data center in the name of a “seat at the table.” just to get out ahead on that foolishness.

100%. This plus the belief that teaching is just telling is how you end up with school districts putting AI tutors in everything.

Trevor Aleo@mraleosays.bsky.social

I think the folks in this camp see teachers like missionaries—well intentioned people who care but probably weren’t “smart enough” for other careers. Easy to see how that view would align with paternalistic forms of managerialism that entrust curriculum to the “real experts” in the private sector.

Finally listened to the Ezra Klein-Sherry Turkle interview on AI relationships. Turkle (as always) identifies the heart of the issue: the AI is designed (and sold) to do away with friction. But friction is a necessary part of human engagement AND learning and growth.

The first 1/3 of the interview is really great, but the smugness really cranks up to 11 when Klein waves away the real world horrors of child suicide in favor of a capitalism, confusing care with contracts.

We could all do with a bit of self reflection about who and what we care for. How is that care expressed in our day to day experiences? How does our technology strengthen or interrupt that care? “We care for what we love, and we love what we care for.”

Wrote an op-ed in 2020 warning that the initial emergency response during COVID to digitize instruction must not be taken as evidence education should and could be done online. It was, and here we are.

Marcus Luther@marcusluther.bsky.social

...is how so many teachers were forced to shift their teaching to online structures a half-decade ago: adapting their courses to LMS's like Canvas, Blackboard; adjusting classroom norms to integrate 1-to-1 technology (Chromebooks!); etc. Tons of time and effort making this happen. (and $$$.)

I really appreciate they asked! And I am happy to take the time to provide an explanation for why that doesn't make sense. But their impulse to jump to AI to prototype a CARD GAME is exactly what worries me about these technologies. AI corps want us to see everything as a nail for the LLM hammer.

Nathan Holbert reposted

MST3K: The RiffTrax Experiments ep. 2 is DEATHSPORT and it'll be available for purchase tomorrow, Friday Oct. 23! IF you're a Kickstarter backer, you (hopefully) just got it. Check your mail! Hope you enjoy.

I agree. I come from a pretty conservative family and I think all the women and most of the men I’m related to would find this disgusting.

Radley Balko@radleybalko.bsky.social

Democrats should really feature these creeps their extensive ties to this administration.

Nathan Holbert reposted

Love that iOS asks me every couple of weeks if I want to activate focus mode while I’m at work. I’m sorry little phone you think I’m texting everyone in my contacts list at 2pm on accident?

Love that iOS asks me every couple of weeks if I want to activate focus mode while I’m at work. I’m sorry little phone you think I’m texting everyone in my contacts list at 2pm on accident?

Nathan Holbert reposted

We played a bit of A Quiet Year in my game design class today. Absolutely love the map mechanic as a shared object for collaborative story telling.

Nathan Holbert reposted

Replying to @mattneligeorge.bsky.social

I think my analysis pushes in the direction of seeing the core conflict as one between capital and labor. If that's the case, I don't know that there's one specific strategy, but (1) recognize that this is a fight, and (2) solidarity is king.

🔥🔥🔥 Intellectual tools for fighting injustice is my love language

Peter K. G. Williams@pkgw.bsky.social

Likely the most important thing I've ever written — if you're an academic and the AI mania unsettles you, here's my best shot at presenting some intellectual tools that might help you articulate why. arxiv.org/abs/2610.27251

Nathan Holbert reposted

Unconscionable to be on “X” at this point. Just a cesspit. Except for banking; I do my banking there & don’t see a problem.