Randomly Secured

Randomly Secured

@randomlysecured.bsky.social

Low information voter.

47 followers46 following181 posts

Yeah, it’s a “problem” with the grand jurors. “But the unsuccessful effort to prosecute Mr. Kelly, Ms. Slotkin and their colleagues … has rattled some people in Ms. Pirro’s office who have come to the conclusion that it reflects a broader problem with Washington grand jurors….” NYTimes

CNN in 1943: “Breaking news. The jewish residents of Warsaw are staging a revolt against the German governing authority. Some fear it may escalate into bloodshed. Next up, we’ll hear from the German minister of propaganda and a jewish leader, followed by a panel of experts on martial law.”

As usual, few legal commentators seem to understand the legal framework Trump is abusing to deploy troops to LA. The Office of Legal Counsel has long concluded that the military can be used domestically to protect federal facilities and functions. That’s the problem… substack.com/@randomlysec...

substack.comRandomlySecured on SubstackLA riots legal primer: As usual, few legal commentators seem to understand the legal framework Trump is abusing to deploy troops to LA. The Office of Legal Counsel has long concluded that the milita...

Deportation to a Salvadoran jail, for extra-legal detention, is illegal notwithstanding the Alien Enemies Act. Removal means removal, not indefinite detention. Indefinite non-criminal detention without periodic review is unconstitutional. It remains unconstitutional if another country is our jailer.

It’s true that jailing US citizens abroad would violate due process, cruel and unusual punishment, and US statutes. But more fundamentally, NO US CITIZEN CAN BE DETAINED UNDER US LAW BY A FOREIGN GOVERNMENT. PERIOD. EXILE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. A US CITIZEN IS PART OF THE US, FOREVER, FOR GOOD OR ILL.

Judge Wilkinson’s opinion excoriating the Administration’s unlawful actions in the Garcia case should be widely read. It is so powerful, and he is so respected by the Supreme Court justices, that the Supreme Court will likely let it stand as the defining view of the Supreme Court’s earlier decision.

With the purge of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board and Inspectors General, and alignment of tech platforms with Trump, the chance of the EU courts and regulators sustaining frameworks that allow EU data to be transferred to the US is rapidly approaching zero. Nice job tech industry.

The EO on DOGE makes it a glorified IT task force by swapping it into the US Digital Service. It reads like a weak grasp for authority to make DOGE a real thing. But it gives DOGE the right to get all agency docs. So the plan is to hope no one notices when DOGE blows past limited USDS authorities.

Just asking can a military officer refuse an order of the President to invade another country? chatGPT: Yes, a military officer can refuse an order from the President to invade another country if they believe that the order is unlawful, particularly if it violates international law.