PUML

PUML

@puml.media

Changing the narrative in San Francisco. Facts over corporate spin 🌀

42 followers1 following482 posts

"Today's San Francisco doesn't just have the world's highest per-capita concentration of billionaires. It also features a sleek, hand-tooled Democratic Party machine designed to serve their interests."

The Mayor’s “rent emergency” does nothing to bring the rents down. Period. The City could freeze the rent, so tenants get some breathing room, and not have to worry about having to pay more in the future.

View full thread

Thanks to legislation introduced by socialist supervisor Jackie Fielder, the eviction machine may slow down a bit.

If passed by the Board of Supervisors, it will prohibit landlords from starting eviction proceedings if a tenant is less than one month behind on rent. But there’s so much more the city could do to help people not be in that predicament in the first place.

The Mayor’s “rent emergency” does nothing to bring the rents down. Period. The City could freeze the rent, so tenants get some breathing room, and not have to worry about having to pay more in the future.

The City could also just help pay peoples’ rents if they get behind and keep them in their homes -- it did this during Covid when people were fighting illness and unemployment, it could do it again.

After successfully killing a plan to develop 180 units of affordable housing at a 400 Divisadero, SF’s YIMBY politicians are celebrating the plan for Greystar (the largest corporate landlord in the country) to develop luxury housing on the site.

Only 10% of the units will be made affordable to neighborhood residents. No units have been constructed yet, but YIMBY leaders are declaring mission accomplished. Rather than house low income San Franciscans, with full support of the neighborhood, the mission appears to be housing for the wealthy.

During Daniel Lurie's first 20 months in office, the rising cost of San Francisco housing rarely found its way into the Mayor's constant stream of shortform videos, press releases and keynote speeches.

View full thread

In February, Lurie proposed returning this $120 million to skyscraper and mansion owners "to ensure San Francisco remains competitive and affordable for workers and families."

Lurie and his allies on the Board of Supervisors have stated their intentions to bring that tax cut back into play. This time, when they do, expect "affordability" to get top billing.

During Daniel Lurie's first 20 months in office, the rising cost of San Francisco housing rarely found its way into the Mayor's constant stream of shortform videos, press releases and keynote speeches.

View full thread

The day after his declaration of emergency, the Mayor confirmed his opposition to a ballot measure that dedicates an existing tax on the sale of skyscrapers and mansions to the construction and acquisition of affordable housing along with rent assistance and tenant protections.

This existing tax raises over $120 million each year which Proposition I would devote entirely to making housing more affordable, with the funding to be dispersed by the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development.

During Daniel Lurie's first 20 months in office, the rising cost of San Francisco housing rarely found its way into the Mayor's constant stream of shortform videos, press releases and keynote speeches.

View full thread

No one having lived through a declared "rent emergency" before, it remains unclear what this means in practice beyond the unmistakable fact that the Mayor will now talk about housing affordability more emphatically and often. On the day he declared the emergency,

Lurie also announced a "new" package of policies to address housing affordability, which consisted of policies that are already in place or were already in motion. Again, it's the packaging that is new.

During Daniel Lurie's first 20 months in office, the rising cost of San Francisco housing rarely found its way into the Mayor's constant stream of shortform videos, press releases and keynote speeches.

View full thread

'Buy real estate in San Francisco,' you know that this crew in here is doing something right." In February, as median rent leapt above $3,300, Lurie "declared a San Francisco comeback" at the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce's 38th annual CityBeat Breakfast.

Then, just six weeks before a midterm election widely seen as a referendum on his performance, as median one-bedroom rent crests $4,000, San Franciscans awoke an announcement in the New York Times that the Mayor had declared a "rent emergency."

During Daniel Lurie's first 20 months in office, the rising cost of San Francisco housing rarely found its way into the Mayor's constant stream of shortform videos, press releases and keynote speeches.

When it did it was mostly construed as a signal (along with the openings of new fast-casual restaurants and proliferating billionaire-funded street concerts) of San Francisco's comeback or as justification.

In December, 2025, as San Francisco median rent climbed above $3,000, Lurie told those gathered at the SF Travel luncheon, "[w]hen you have the head of Blackstone running along our wharf telling everybody...

"In Lurie, the nation’s elites think they may have found the answer. ‘The foil to the rising socialists might be found in a red state with conservative values. But perhaps he’s a Democrat in San Francisco Read the whole story puml.media/a-lifelong-r...

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors is required to incorporate input from the City's Youth Commission whenever it considers legislation that affects young people and the Commission has been instrumental in the success of policies like the closing of Juvenile Hall and Free Muni for Youth.

View full thread

Lurie's Youth Commission appointments are consistent with his policies for grown-ups, which typically prioritize those least in need.

Now Lurie has demonstrated that you're never too young have your privilege accentuated by City Hall, and that he is committed to a future in which the well-off continue to be disproportionately represented in San Francisco's halls of power.

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors is required to incorporate input from the City's Youth Commission whenever it considers legislation that affects young people and the Commission has been instrumental in the success of policies like the closing of Juvenile Hall and Free Muni for Youth.

View full thread

While that spread isn't representative of San Francisco, where 70 percent of school aged children attend public schools, it is very representative of City Hall. Lurie went to elite private schools.

Only three members of the current Board of Supervisors attended SFUSD, and key Mayoral allies Board President Rafael Mandelman and Stephen Sherrill are both prep school alumni like the Mayor.

San Francisco's Board of Supervisors is required to incorporate input from the City's Youth Commission whenever it considers legislation that affects young people and the Commission has been instrumental in the success of policies like the closing of Juvenile Hall and Free Muni for Youth.

Last week, Mission Local's Yujie Zhou broke the story that Daniel Lurie had appointed 6 private school children to the Youth Commission, and none who attend public school, resulting in a Youth Commission where only 6 of 17 total commissioners attend public school.

America's first billionaire President has been blatant in his attempts to retain his grip on power by rigging the electoral system in his favor.

View full thread

The passage of Prop D would inaugurate a new politics in San Francisco, one in which grassroots efforts to do things like raise the minimum wage, tax billionaires, protect renters, and build affordable housing would never see the light of day.

It's clear why Daniel Lurie and his billionaire allies would prefer to live in that future, but ordinary working San Franciscans need to send them a clear message that they are DEF-initely not going to vote away their democratic power.

America's first billionaire President has been blatant in his attempts to retain his grip on power by rigging the electoral system in his favor.

View full thread

Historically, San Francisco's citizen initiatives have been a means to enact policies that benefit the working class even when, as now, working class San Francisco is not well-represented in City Hall.

Lurie's charter amendment would mean that only measures backed by big money interests would ever make it to the ballot, measures like Propositions D,E, and F, which have raised and spent millions of dollars to reach voters in November.

America's first billionaire President has been blatant in his attempts to retain his grip on power by rigging the electoral system in his favor.

View full thread

In reality, his trio of ballot measures this November -- Propositions D, E and F -- would consolidate power in the Mayor's Office and further enhance the political power of the ultrawealthy.

Proposition D is the most egregious of these. It raises the threshhold for signatures and Board of Supervisor votes necessary to place a measure before voters at the ballot box.

America's first billionaire President has been blatant in his attempts to retain his grip on power by rigging the electoral system in his favor.

Most people are old enough to remember January 6th, 2021, even though the consequences for that insurrection were short-lived. Trump continues to introduce innovative new ways to reduce the voting power of people who don't support him and enhance it for those who do.

Here in San Francisco, our first billionaire mayor is mounting a more covert attack on the free exercise of democracy, but one whose consequences could endure for generations. Mayor Daniel Lurie's anti-democracy program is being marketed as "charter reform" to "clean up City Hall."

Longtime service provider Hospitality House has fallen victim to the Mayor's plans to "revitalize" 6th Street, and has been ordered to close its 6th St. drop-in center by the end of the year.

View full thread

Removing services dedicated to keeping people alive and replacing them with expensive, temporary, enforced sobriety won't solve any of the city's problems but it will surely cause many people to suffer more than they otherwise would. And maybe that's the point.

Brooke Jenkins captured the idea well a few years ago when she said the homeless "have to be made uncomfortable." This approach hasn't achieved its desired outcomes yet but City Hall seems hopeful that causing more discomfort will do the trick.

Longtime service provider Hospitality House has fallen victim to the Mayor's plans to "revitalize" 6th Street, and has been ordered to close its 6th St. drop-in center by the end of the year.

View full thread

The RESET Center is run jointly by San Francisco's Sheriff and Public Health Departments and a venture-funded company from Arizona called Connections Health Solutions, which provides the operations layer for a cool half a million taxpayer dollars every month.

Hospitality House, meanwhile, operates three locations in San Francisco with roughly half that.

Longtime service provider Hospitality House has fallen victim to the Mayor's plans to "revitalize" 6th Street, and has been ordered to close its 6th St. drop-in center by the end of the year.

The 4,200 people it serves annually will be without a trusted and familiar place to get connected to healthcare, employment and housing.

Lurie's 6th St. ambitions are anchored by the recently opened flagship RESET Center nearby, a forced substance-withdrawal detention center where as many as 25 people at a time who've been arrested for public drug use involuntarily detox for up to 24 hours and then released back onto 6th St.