Predatory Journals

Predatory Journals

@predatoryjournals.org

The #Predatory Journals List. Also in https://x.com/PredatoryReport Website: https://predatoryjournals.org/

2K followers22 following117 posts

Predatory Journals reposted

🚨 Peer review crisis alert! When journals reject good science simply because they can’t find enough reviewers, the whole integrity of research is on the line. www.the-scientist.com/when-reviewe... #AcademicPublishing #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #SciencePolicy

the-scientist.comWhen Reviewer Scarcity Becomes a Reason for Rejection, Scientific Integrity Is at RiskIf journals reject papers due to review shortages, the peer review process itself becomes compromised.

Predatory Journals reposted

Predatory Journals reposted

Predatory Journals reposted

Another AI-generated, low-quality paper just got retracted from Scientific Reports — and fast. 👀⚠️ The spotlight works: media pressure accelerates corrections. But let’s be honest… there’s still a long queue of questionable studies waiting for action at @springernature.com doi.org/10.1038/s415...

doi.orgRETRACTED ARTICLE: Bridging the gap: explainable ai for autism diagnosis and parental support with TabPFNMix and SHAP - Scientific ReportsScientific Reports - RETRACTED ARTICLE: Bridging the gap: explainable ai for autism diagnosis and parental support with TabPFNMix and SHAP

Predatory Journals reposted

🧪 After 25 years, a landmark study claiming the herbicide Glyphosate (and Roundup) was “safe” has been officially retracted — due to ghost-writing and clear conflicts of interest. What was once scientific “proof” now collapses. #Science #Glyphosate #Retracted ☣️ www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

theguardian.comScience journal retracts study on safety of Monsanto’s Roundup: ‘Serious ethical concerns’Paper published in 2000 found glyphosate was not harmful, while internal emails later revealed company’s influence

Predatory Journals reposted

🧪 After 25 years, a landmark study claiming the herbicide Glyphosate (and Roundup) was “safe” has been officially retracted — due to ghost-writing and clear conflicts of interest. What was once scientific “proof” now collapses. #Science #Glyphosate #Retracted ☣️ www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025...

theguardian.comScience journal retracts study on safety of Monsanto’s Roundup: ‘Serious ethical concerns’Paper published in 2000 found glyphosate was not harmful, while internal emails later revealed company’s influence

Another AI-generated, low-quality paper just got retracted from Scientific Reports — and fast. 👀⚠️ The spotlight works: media pressure accelerates corrections. But let’s be honest… there’s still a long queue of questionable studies waiting for action at @springernature.com doi.org/10.1038/s415...

doi.orgRETRACTED ARTICLE: Bridging the gap: explainable ai for autism diagnosis and parental support with TabPFNMix and SHAP - Scientific ReportsScientific Reports - RETRACTED ARTICLE: Bridging the gap: explainable ai for autism diagnosis and parental support with TabPFNMix and SHAP

🚨 Peer review crisis alert! When journals reject good science simply because they can’t find enough reviewers, the whole integrity of research is on the line. www.the-scientist.com/when-reviewe... #AcademicPublishing #PeerReview #ResearchIntegrity #SciencePolicy

the-scientist.comWhen Reviewer Scarcity Becomes a Reason for Rejection, Scientific Integrity Is at RiskIf journals reject papers due to review shortages, the peer review process itself becomes compromised.

📉 Niche fields, early-career scholars, and emerging topics risk being sidelined — not for lack of merit, but for lack of reviewers. 🔧 Solution? Expand reviewer pools, give credit to reviewers, increase transparency — science must be evaluated on quality, not logistics.

Predatory Journals reposted

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

🕵️‍♂️ Design isn’t just cosmetic. Visual cues can help flag low-quality or predatory journals—especially when screening large volumes. Content still matters, but the look tells a story too. #OpenScience #ResearchIntegrity

🧐 Predatory articles are statistically: ~half the length (fewer pages & characters) Using “default” fonts (Arial, Calibri) Standard A4 pages, little typographic variety Simpler metadata, less polished

Predatory Journals reposted

🧵1: Peer Review Is Cracking. Researchers are churning out papers to survive. Peer reviewers are overwhelmed. Editors chase quantity, not quality. It's not science—it’s a paper factory. Reform is urgent, or public trust will collapse. www.theguardian.com/science/2025...

theguardian.comScientific publishing needs urgent reform to retain trust in research process | LettersLetters: Readers respond to an article on how too many low-quality papers and journals are being churned out

🧵1. Predatory journals aren’t just a nuisance—they erode trust in science. A new #AI tool just scanned ~15k journals & flagged over 1k suspicious outlets. Could this be the watchdog science needs? 🧠🔎 #ResearchIntegrity #Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgEstimating the predictability of questionable open-access journalsAI screening of journals identifies over a thousand questionable journals, helping experts review where it is needed most.

🧵1. Predatory journals aren’t just a nuisance—they erode trust in science. A new #AI tool just scanned ~15k journals & flagged over 1k suspicious outlets. Could this be the watchdog science needs? 🧠🔎 #ResearchIntegrity #Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgEstimating the predictability of questionable open-access journalsAI screening of journals identifies over a thousand questionable journals, helping experts review where it is needed most.

🧵1. Predatory journals aren’t just a nuisance—they erode trust in science. A new #AI tool just scanned ~15k journals & flagged over 1k suspicious outlets. Could this be the watchdog science needs? 🧠🔎 #ResearchIntegrity #Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgEstimating the predictability of questionable open-access journalsAI screening of journals identifies over a thousand questionable journals, helping experts review where it is needed most.

🧵4. About 24% false positives. Meaning: the AI isn’t a judge—it’s a first line of defense. Humans still need to verify. Think ‘radar’ not ‘verdict.’ 🛰️ #ResponsibleAI #AcademicTwitter

🧵1. Predatory journals aren’t just a nuisance—they erode trust in science. A new #AI tool just scanned ~15k journals & flagged over 1k suspicious outlets. Could this be the watchdog science needs? 🧠🔎 #ResearchIntegrity #Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgEstimating the predictability of questionable open-access journalsAI screening of journals identifies over a thousand questionable journals, helping experts review where it is needed most.

🧵1. Predatory journals aren’t just a nuisance—they erode trust in science. A new #AI tool just scanned ~15k journals & flagged over 1k suspicious outlets. Could this be the watchdog science needs? 🧠🔎 #ResearchIntegrity #Science www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgEstimating the predictability of questionable open-access journalsAI screening of journals identifies over a thousand questionable journals, helping experts review where it is needed most.

🧵2. Instead of reading papers, the AI checks websites: design quality, missing editors, dodgy language, weird citations. It’s not judging content—it’s spotting red flags in the ecosystem. 🚨 #OpenScience #FakeJournals

🧵1: Peer Review Is Cracking. Researchers are churning out papers to survive. Peer reviewers are overwhelmed. Editors chase quantity, not quality. It's not science—it’s a paper factory. Reform is urgent, or public trust will collapse. www.theguardian.com/science/2025...

theguardian.comScientific publishing needs urgent reform to retain trust in research process | LettersLetters: Readers respond to an article on how too many low-quality papers and journals are being churned out

🧵1: Peer Review Is Cracking. Researchers are churning out papers to survive. Peer reviewers are overwhelmed. Editors chase quantity, not quality. It's not science—it’s a paper factory. Reform is urgent, or public trust will collapse. www.theguardian.com/science/2025...

theguardian.comScientific publishing needs urgent reform to retain trust in research process | LettersLetters: Readers respond to an article on how too many low-quality papers and journals are being churned out

🧵3: Alternatives exist. Global South Is Leading the Way. Latin America’s @scielo.org and the Diamond OA Alliance prove publishing can be free to read & free to publish. Science doesn’t need billion-dollar intermediaries. It needs public infrastructure and values over volume.

🧵1: Peer Review Is Cracking. Researchers are churning out papers to survive. Peer reviewers are overwhelmed. Editors chase quantity, not quality. It's not science—it’s a paper factory. Reform is urgent, or public trust will collapse. www.theguardian.com/science/2025...

theguardian.comScientific publishing needs urgent reform to retain trust in research process | LettersLetters: Readers respond to an article on how too many low-quality papers and journals are being churned out

🧵2: Open Access? More Like Open Wallet. OA was supposed to democratize science. Instead, universities now pay up to $10K per article in APCs—feeding publishers with profit margins over 35%. The result? Pay-to-play research and rising global inequality in who gets to publish.

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

6/6 🧵 Bottom line: 📉 Springer Nature’s latest retraction is a symptom of a bigger crisis in academic publishing. 📚 Just because it’s a book doesn’t mean it’s science. Retractions like this? More are coming.

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

1/6 🚨 Springer Nature is retracting an entire book on machine learning. Why? It was full of plagiarized content, nonsensical claims, and had no proper peer review. 🤮 Retraction Watch: 1 Springer’s credibility: 0

2/6 👀 What triggered the retraction? A Retraction Watch exposé showed the book was riddled with garbage science — from AI "consciousness" ramblings to fabricated equations. Yes, Springer published it anyway. 🤯

Predatory Journals reposted

Parallels between Trump’s government and Orwell’s 1984 are striking: language manipulation, “alternative facts,” and efforts to control public discourse echo Newspeak and reality control from the novel. When leaders rewrite words and history, democracy faces real Orwellian risks. #Trump #Orwell

Predatory Journals reposted

🚨 ICMJE should certify legitimate journals to combat the rise of predatory ones? 🔍 Fake journals mimic real ones, trap authors, and pollute science. ✅ A global seal of trust could protect research integrity? 🔗 jamanetwork.com/journals/jam... #AcademicPublishing #PredatoryJournals

jamanetwork.comICMJE Should Create a Certification Process to Identify Predatory JournalsTo the Editor A recent Editorial1 by editors representing the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) highlighted the pressing issues surrounding predatory journals. Although the ch...

Predatory Journals reposted

💰 Authorship for sale. 🧐 A Nature investigation exposes how paper mills sell fake authorship slots—and corrupt the scientific record. 🧪 Science is being hijacked for a price. 🔗 www.nature.com/articles/d41... #AcademicIntegrity #PaperMills #ScienceFraud

nature.comAuthorship for sale: Nature investigates how paper mills workCompanies selling authorship slots thrive in a culture that equates success with a strong publication record. Customers, sleuths and the shadowy owner of a paper mill explain why.

Predatory Journals reposted