rkletr
rkletr
@merkletr.ee
cryptography liker. ctf player. array languager? music enjoyer. en/frCA. SPDX-License-Identifier: 0BSD
349 followers191 following3.9K posts
what are people even doing that they need abliterated versions of models? i've had ds be like super enthusiastic to pwn a site i explicitly had no authorization to touch, executing attack reqs against their production (i just wanted to audit the source). and people still want less refusal than that?
this book constantly reiterates an idea that we don't know how to do computer security, encouraging thinking that making things safe is an unsolvable problem people who have this mindset in the industry are the ones who choose to fail to apply the engineering principles that solve security problems
"If Anyone Builds It, Everyone Dies" makes me so fucking angry as an actual software engineer everything is just so so so wrong
the 4th paragraph casually tells you to assume this fictional ai (that they want to convince you could exist in the real world) breaks Amdahl's law. "yeah parallel scaling laws trust me it's just like the other scaling laws" and then they start talking about a cluster... no mention of communication.
rkletr reposted
Publishing “Cryptographic Right Answers” for developers is a tradition by now. Colin Percival started in 2009, Thomas Ptacek followed up in 2015, and then Latacora carried on in 2018 and 2024. I put together a list updated for the renewed urgency of migrating to post-quantum algorithms.
the nix modules that make it work on the guest are generated from the config so you can just scp it on from the host. or hell, have the repo on the guest and generate nix inside. it's not like having the code actually gives any power, the only thing breaking the nix side can do is remove capabilites
i wish i could delegate all my programming to the machine god but the machine's capabilities are jagged and unfortunately lag behind in areas i consider critical
this post brought to you by llms once again being terrible at software engineering in ways that to me seem egregious until i once again remember that the average software engineer actually sucks at software engineering and llms are probably above median
designing normal databases has probably been one of the more important things a cs degree taught me (in my case moreso gave me vocabulary and formal framework for what i already knew intuitively but still) if you don't intuitively get sql schemas i would highly recommend putting the effort in for it
maybe the reason llm benchmarks mostly suck and dont represent performance is just cause the average llm user cant stop themselves from making slop how hard can it be to just actually manually go through and audit your damn benchmark tasks before releasing it to the world
Introducing Benchmark Reviews: our new initiative to audit AI benchmarks. We are launching with 15 benchmarks: 4 Verified, 9 Flawed, and 2 with not enough information for a review.
i:(1_'i)@=`s$*'i:" "\'(97>*:')_0:`i w:640;s:w,h:480 v:@[+.''i`v;1;-:] p:0.5*s+h*(2#v)*\:q:1%1-0.2*v@2 f:((.*"/"\)''i`f)-1 d:{-/x*|y} (a;b;c):++'p[;f] D:1%d[b-a]c-a "o.ppm"1:("P6\n640 480\n255\n"),,//{{`c$$[#k:&~0>&/e:(1-B+C;B:D*d[x-a]c-a;C:D*d[b-a]x-a);_255*e[;k@*>Q:+/e[;k]*+q@f@k];&3]}'(!w),\:x}'!h