Leon Derczynski

Leon Derczynski

@leonderczynski.bsky.social

LLMs & Security at NVIDIA Prof in CS/NLP at IT University of Copenhagen garak guy, garak.ai "berømt skikkelse" "like a gazelle" Seattle/Copenhagen 🏔️

845 followers371 following328 posts

AI agents aren’t ‘going rogue.’ Frontier labs are skipping security basics. > Compounding the problem, according to a half dozen cybersecurity experts CSO interviewed at three industry conferences in September and in subsequent conversations, is that ...

... the frontier labs [..] have rejected their advice on how to improve their cybersecurity risk management practices to avoid these kinds of surreptitious hacks, often lumping cybersecurity practices under “AI safety,” in which they believe they have superior expertise.

Leon Derczynski reposted

New NVIDIA AIRT research! Tamas Voros did great work adapting refusal direction to preventing indirect prompt injection. Really neat mech-interp approach that's very effective at stopping single-turn indirect prompt injection with minimal impact on normal use. research.nvidia.com/ai-security/...

research.nvidia.comNXDirection: No-eXecute Along the Instruction Direction | ResearchTakeaways for Non-Researchers AI agents are constantly reading outside information. Sophisticated attackers can create a heightened risk of exposing private information or taking an unauthorized actio...

Separate control & data plane for agents! This explicit marker affords a nice workaround for the risk presented when data (instead of instructions) are executed. Making that mistake is a classic weakness going way back before modern LLMs - even before Schmidhuber!

View full thread

This doesn't solve security of agents, but that security is never solved on just one layer alone. What NXDirection presents is a massive advance in the ability to control instruction vs. data separation by LLM-driven code - working exactly at the most problematic layer.

research.nvidia.comNXDirection: No-eXecute Along the Instruction Direction | ResearchTakeaways for Non-Researchers AI agents are constantly reading outside information. Sophisticated attackers can create a heightened risk of exposing private information or taking an unauthorized…

Separate control & data plane for agents! This explicit marker affords a nice workaround for the risk presented when data (instead of instructions) are executed. Making that mistake is a classic weakness going way back before modern LLMs - even before Schmidhuber!

NXDirection labels content as data rather than instruction-bearing, and using this systems yields a massive drop in attack success from 38.1% to 0.1% in one standard test, and from 28.4% to 3.7% in a more complex and advanced test. That's good.

research.nvidia.comNXDirection: No-eXecute Along the Instruction Direction | ResearchTakeaways for Non-Researchers AI agents are constantly reading outside information. Sophisticated attackers can create a heightened risk of exposing private information or taking an unauthorized…
View full thread

many such cases and studies, don't take my word for it, do your own research etc. but starting with llm-generated text consistently caps the quality of results across a range of tasks and contexts.

existing text biases what people are thinking about and reduces the amount and range of things they'll contribute it's like trying to do decent writing about a challenging topic, while there are people talking in the background

GhostCompact: ~Free OpenAI inference "When the model's first action after compacting was a tool call, the API billed only for post-compaction tokens, but the tool call response still contained the full compaction item." Information loves to leak. Unsure what a good passive control would be here.

I get some wild mails while at NVIDIA. Like today - would I like to give a "paid, recorded interview on AI governance and US–China competition" to a researcher in Hong Kong and give my opinions on Huawei silicon. That is.. not something we will be doing.

One divide in computer science can be between the uncertainty-reducers and the uncertainty-embracers. An instance of this is connectionist vs. symbolist approaches to AI (the uncertainty embracers won .. for now). Another is how computer scientists react to natural language.

Some find the human ability to communicate without expressing everything in a stable, fully populated structure quite disgusting (Randall Monroe included I guess, see graphic) - others find it fascinating.

But my question is this: Why would text have to conform to a lower-order computationally-expressable grammar? Text isn't even all of language - there's lots of other information out there, and it's all in the humans and the human experience.

We NVIDIA have officially agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12,930,300,000 and zero cents! HF is critical infrastructure that NVIDIA will strengthen and ensure sustained access to for developers and institutions worldwide. 🧵

View full thread

I think NVIDIA is a great home for Hugging Face - I'm pretty open about NV being the best place to do open, unbiased work; that's why I chose them as a home when moving on from academia (which I dearly love).

The neutrality and might that NVIDIA bring is a fantastic match for Hugging Face and their crucial place among researchers and industry. This acquisition feels like it puts a lot of calm on to the future of machine learning research and open access to open weight work. Good. 🤗💚

We NVIDIA have officially agreed to acquire Hugging Face for $12,930,300,000 and zero cents! HF is critical infrastructure that NVIDIA will strengthen and ensure sustained access to for developers and institutions worldwide. 🧵

I've followed and used Hugging Face since it was a chat platform, even before the iconic "transformers" library landed in 2018. There are some wonderful people at HF and I'm looking forward to having so many of them as colleagues. Really happy.

Securing the agent stack: * Distribution: Package installation & defaults * Orchestration: Selects and coordinates harnesses * Agent harness: Loop, context, tools, sessions * Secure runtime: Isolation, identity, policy, creds, audit * Inference data plane: Model serving, cache placement, routing

qualitative is harder than quantitative quantitative is the reductive, lossy representation of qualitative given the choice, preferring quantitative is taking the easy, less well-informed road, than dealing with the deep reality of qualitative quantitative is the cop out

spec: - Grace Blackwell Ultra GB300 Superchip - 496GB LPDDR5X CPU memory, 252GB HBM3e GPU memory - Supports up to 1 trillion parameter models - 20 Petaflops (20,000 TFLOPS) of FP4 computing power - Ubuntu with NVIDIA AI Developer Tools ..unclear if it runs crysis

Agentic AI Challenges Progress in Confidential Computing securing data on gpus is non-trivial. encryption has to be low level to stop accidental exposures. lots of the slowdowns here have now been addressed. maybe confidential computing will finally happen? www.darkreading.com/endpoint-sec...

darkreading.comAgentic AI Challenges Progress in Confidential ComputingCore issues that slowed down the adoption of secure data vaults are being resolved by technology, but artificial intelligence poses new ones.

Decent history of distilliation-type events, where information is reconstructed Machine learning distilliation is just another instance of a teacher-student dynamic, where one can reconstruct information efficiently. Even basic synthesis of research is distillation. It's a commonplace activity.

Every context is different, by definition. Being able to fit tools to context is therefore critical - and this generalisation holds incredibly well. Being able to tune a model to a task, gets it to perform better in context. Look at these solid examples: blogs.nvidia.com/blog/nemotro...

blogs.nvidia.comNemotron Labs: How Open Models Give Enterprises and Nations AI They Can Trust, Control and CustomizeLearn how NVIDIA Nemotron open models help enterprises build specialized AI they can trust, control and customize with accuracy, efficiency and flexibility.

Legal takes on distillation: * Distillation doesn’t involve breaking in to download weights/code * Distillation doesn’t copy a patented implementation or method * Mass distillation merits policy response * Value loss thru distillation is a business model problem www.lawfaremedia.org/article/resp...

lawfaremedia.orgResponding to AI Distillation Without PanicBefore locking in new restrictions on AI models, policymakers should ask how much distillation actually contributes to the threat.

Linux kernel team publishes 432 CVEs in two days Agent-powered vulnerabilty discovery has created a huge wave of incidents and reports that are cascading through systems from left to right - through triage, into remediation, then distribution, and patch management.