Jeff Harris

14 Jan 2025

Replying to @tribelaw.bsky.social

We urgently need to pass a Constitutional amendment to overturn both the Supreme Court's ruling on Presidential immunity, and Justice Departments memo on not prosecuting a sitting president. No one should be above the law. Such immunity is not in our national interest.

1 May

Brilliant fun, worth reposting !

Hoodlum 🇺🇸@nothoodlum.bsky.social

From Jimmy Kimmel.

open.substack.comTrump didn’t pivot on Ukraine. He’s playing catch up.Somewhere down in the bowels of the Pentagon, there is an office in which people actually know what they’re talking about.

25 Sept 2025

Lucian's observations about military engagements are informed by his education at US Military Academy West Point and skillfully written so anyone can understand them. They are worth reading. Trump didn’t pivot on Ukraine. He’s playing catch up. open.substack.com/pub/luciantr...

Jeff Harris reposted

Jill Lawrence

@jilldlawrence.bsky.social

edwineisendrath.substack.comJohn Roberts gets it wrong. Again.The Chief Justice’s end-of-year message omitted the most serious threats to judicial independence, and attempted to lay blame on others while ignoring his own role in eroding that independence.

"John Roberts wants to protect the independence of a court that has already been captured." @eisendrath.net on the many problems with the chief justice's year-end report. Absolutely maddening. edwineisendrath.substack.com/p/john-rober...

lawdork.comJohn Roberts attacks court criticism that he decides lacks a "credible basis" as "illegitimate"Conflating violence against judges with broad criticism the court faces for its extremism, the chief justice ultimately sends a chilling end-of-year report.

Enough is enough. The arrogance of John Robert tell us his corrupt court and its unprecedented decisions are somehow above criticism is breathtaking. We must elect a Congress that will enact much needed reforms.

Chris Geidner@chrisgeidner.bsky.social

What I take from Chief Justice Roberts's report to the nation is that judges are supposed to be able to handle criticism, but not too much and not in a way that Roberts doesn’t like, and he will only vaguely tell us what that means, but if criticism crosses that invisible line it is illegitimate.

The blatant corruption on the Roberts Supreme Court along with its unprecedented decisions, including but not limited to creating presidential immunity from criminal prosecution, and overturning overturning Roe v Wade, all deserve the criticism the receive. Furthermore, they demand reform.

Roberts is suffering from delusions of grandeur if thinks he and his fellow travelers should be above criticism. By conflating legitimate criticism with threats of violence, Roberts is further undermining our democratic process.