Jindřich Libovický

Jindřich Libovický

@jlibovicky.bsky.social

Researcher at Charles University | multilingual natural language processing, machine translation

578 followers259 following68 posts

TokShop is just one week away! 🎉 I'm proud of the lineup of invited speakers we've put together. Meet them here: tokenization-workshop.github.io/speakers

tokenization-workshop.github.ioSecond Tokenization Workshop @ COLM 2026 | Speakers

🎉 Our last invited speaker announcement — TokShop is next week! Welcome Artidoro Pagnoni @artidoro.bsky.social (Meta Superintelligence, FAIR), lead author of the Byte Latent Transformer (BLT) and co-creator of QLoRA. Best paper award & orals at ACL/NeurIPS.

Everything you always wanted to know about tokenization but were afraid to ask! 🧩 @mcognetta.bsky.social l and @uvp.bsky.social nagged 30+ researchers (myself included) until we ended up with the most comprehensive survey on tokenization in NLP: www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2609.tok...

alphaxiv.orgTokenization: A Survey for Modern NLPTokenization is presented as a core language-model design choice that shapes sequence length, computational cost, multilingual equity, evaluation, and security—not merely as preprocessing. The...
Marco@mcognetta.bsky.social

🚨 [Token][ization] Paper Alert 🚨 Tokenization is a wildly understudied area of language modeling despite it having effects across all of NLP. Over the past ~8 months, 32 (!) tokenizer researchers put together the most comprehensive survey of the field. Check it out!

Answer: similarity of that language's representation to English. Unless two languages are very close (e.g., Czech/Slovak), alignment with English matters much more than similarity to the source language. Want to know more? Catch Adnan at #EMNLP2026 in Budapest!

Very proud of my student Lukáš Eigler presenting this at the ACL Student Research Workshop. TL;DR: you can validate NLP evaluation metrics with synthetic LLM judgments — the rankings track human ones almost perfectly. 📄 aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw.125

aclanthology.orgLLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric ValidationLukáš Eigler, Jindřich Libovický, David Hurych. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 4: Student Research Workshop). 2026.

LLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric Validation aclanthology.org/2026.acl-srw... by Lukáš Eigler, @jlibovicky.bsky.social & David Hurych Rankings from synthetic LLM-generated data almost perfectly match real human judgments. 🤖⚖️ at Student Research Workshop

Dušan made something like TensorBoard for tokenization 📊 Token length, entropy, vocab overlap, JS divergence, alignment scores: sliced by language family, script, region, speakers, data availability. 🔗 Code: github.com/ufal/TokCollate 🔗 Demo: quest.ms.mff.cuni.cz/tokcollate

Dušan Variš presents joint work w/ @abyste.bsky.social & @jlibovicky.bsky.social: TokCollate: A Comprehensive Tool for Tokenizer Evaluation and Visualization across Languages aclanthology.org/2026.acl-dem... A dashboard for your tokenizer 👀 See which languages you left behind. Open-source, MIT.

AC observation this ARR cycle: I'm getting way more reviews and way earlier, than usual. I suspect it's the draconian desk-reject threats working, and not a sign of better reviewing culture. I worry that this gets read as 'threats work, do more of them, discipline the lazy researchers'.

Lukáš Eigler defended his thesis (co-supervised with David Hurych, @valeoai.bsky.social) 🎉 Congrats! #NLP metric validation needs 🐌💰 human judgment data. Our fix: generate synthetic data for metric validation. ✅ Tested on MT, QA, summarization. To appear #ACL2026 SRW: arxiv.org/abs/2603.09403

arxiv.orgLLM as a Meta-Judge: Synthetic Data for NLP Evaluation Metric ValidationValidating evaluation metrics for NLG typically relies on expensive and time-consuming human annotations, which predominantly exist only for English datasets. We propose LLM as a Meta-Judge, a scalabl...

Nice work by my student @gianlucavico.bsky.social on a topic close to home: crowdsourcing Piedmontese to test LLMs on non-standard orthography. New dataset covering tokenization, classification & translation.

Crowdsourcing Piedmontese to Test LLMs on Non-Standard Orthography by @gianlucavico.bsky.social and @jlibovicky.bsky.social aclanthology.org/2026.vardial... New Piedmontese dataset tests tokenization, classification & translation! 🗣️

So proud of my new PhD student Adnan Al Ali for presenting their master's thesis work at EACL! 🎓 A great contribution to understanding bias in AI text detectors across languages.

Different Time, Different Language: Revisiting the Bias Against Non-Native Speakers in GPT Detectors by Adnan Al Ali, @jindrahelcl.bsky.social and @jlibovicky.bsky.social aclanthology.org/2026.eacl-sr... AI text detectors are suspected of biasing against non-native speakers, but not in Czech 🇨🇿

I'm at #EACL2026 in Rabat 🇲🇦. Find me and talk to me about tokenization or multilingual model eval. Also, check out our work on how to eval morphological plausibility of your tokenizer if you don't have gold segmentation data, but you happen to have morphosyntactic features 👇

Evaluating Morphological Plausibility of Subword Tokenization via Statistical Alignment with Morpho-Syntactic Features by @abyste.bsky.social & @jlibovicky.bsky.social aclanthology.org/2026.finding... TL;DR: Morpho-syntax features replace gold segmentation data for tokenization eval.

Thanks for organizing this! I am definitely coming, and everyone interested in tokenization at #EACL2025 should too. 🫵

Ilker Kesen@ilkerkesen.bsky.social

📢I'm organizing a BoF session at #EACL2026 called Tokenization & Beyond, aiming to gather researchers exploring tokenization and alternatives such as byte-level and pixel-based approaches. Sign up using the form if you're interested! #NLProc @eaclmeeting.bsky.social

Some students find the assignments too time-consuming. Fair. But here's what the data shows over 3 years: 📉 Forum questions dropped ~4× 📈 Full bonus points: 20% → 27% → 52% 📉 Avg. test attempts: 2.7 → 2.4 → 1.9 Asking less, achieving more, iterating less. 🤔

Spent time making AI-generated images of Bayes' Rule, Laplace Smoothing, Markov Chains & Shannon Entropy for class today 🎨🤖 Even though the images are objectively hilarious, none of the 50 students in the room laughed. Or even smiled. 💀

More interesting: humans are predictably inconsistent in their values. LLMs capture this but overgeneralize: they become more stereotypically consistent than actual humans. After several rejections, finally publishable. To appear at the Multilingual Multicultural Evaluation workshop at EACL 2026.

We have updated the pre-print on CUS-QA, benchmark for regional knowledge about Czechia, Slovakia and Ukraine arxiv.org/abs/2507.22752 Now, there are results of retrieval-augmented generation and more detailed analysis of model performance depending on the topic of the question or visual context.

arxiv.orgCUS-QA: Local-Knowledge-Oriented Open-Ended Question Answering DatasetWe introduce CUS-QA, a benchmark for evaluation of open-ended regional question answering that encompasses both textual and visual modalities. We also provide strong baselines using state-of-the-art l...
Jindřich Libovický@jlibovicky.bsky.social

🧵 We're releasing CUS-QA - a new benchmark for testing LLMs on regional knowledge! Find out what your model knows about Czechia 🇨🇿, Slovakia 🇸🇰, and Ukraine 🇺🇦! 👉 Textual and visual questions, answers, and human judgment on model outputs! huggingface.co/datasets/ufa... www.arxiv.org/abs/2507.22752

👉 What do we do? We use the good old IBM1 model to align subwords with morphological features from Unimorph and we show it captures the same thing as morpheme boundary recall. 👉 Why it matters? For many languages good segmentation data is missing. Morphological features are more widely available.

Attenzione! 🇮🇹 Know Piedmontese or Neapolitan speakers? @gianlucavico.bsky.social is collecting crowd-sourced translations to evaluate LLM performance on these regional languages. Partecipate!

Gianluca Vico@gianlucavico.bsky.social

We’re collecting crowd-sourced translations in Piedmontese and Neapolitan. 🎯 Goal: see how well LLMs understand these languages. 👉 Participate here (in IT🇮🇹): - Piedmontese: quest.ms.mff.cuni.cz/crowd-transl... - Neapolitan: quest.ms.mff.cuni.cz/crowd-transl... Anyone can join, no need to be fluent!

☝️🧵 Most current approaches emphasize langauge neutrality: about two-thirds of VL benchmarks use translation-based evaluation. This makes sense because we can explicitly train for language neutrality when we have parallel data. But... 🧵👇

Cultural awareness is trickier. Different data for different cultures means we can't really compare performance across cultures in a straightforward way. And there's no clear optimization target for cultural awareness beyond curating diverse training data.

So proud of my PhD student @andrei-a-manea.bsky.social for his first first-author publication! 🎉 He presented this work last week at TSD. Investigating the Effect of Parallel Data in the Cross-Lingual Transfer for Vision-Language Encoders arxiv.org/pdf/2504.21681

arxiv.orgarxiv.org

Investigating the Effect of Parallel Data in the Cross-Lingual Transfer for Vision-Language Encoders by @andrei-a-manea.bsky.social & @jlibovicky.bsky.social TL;DR: Explore how parallel datasets improve cross-lingual transfer in vision-language models. arxiv.org/abs/2504.21681

Most vision-language models only work in English. We explore how different parallel data types (machine-translated vs authentic captions) affect cross-lingual transfer. Key finding: authentic data can outperform machine translation, and multilingual training beats bilingual approaches. #NLP

🧵 We're releasing CUS-QA - a new benchmark for testing LLMs on regional knowledge! Find out what your model knows about Czechia 🇨🇿, Slovakia 🇸🇰, and Ukraine 🇺🇦! 👉 Textual and visual questions, answers, and human judgment on model outputs! huggingface.co/datasets/ufa... www.arxiv.org/abs/2507.22752

huggingface.coufal/cus-qa · Datasets at Hugging FaceWe’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.
View full thread

The results are... humbling 😅 Even the best models: >40% accuracy on textual questions <30% on visual questions Often perform better in English than the local language (!!) Visual QA with regional images is especially challenging.

For evaluation researchers: Simple string-overlap metrics (BLEU, chrF) work surprisingly well for factual QA. 🤔 When answers are mostly named entities, exact matches matter more than we thought. LLM-as-judge 🦙🧑‍⚖️ correlates best with human judgment, though.

🧵 We're releasing CUS-QA - a new benchmark for testing LLMs on regional knowledge! Find out what your model knows about Czechia 🇨🇿, Slovakia 🇸🇰, and Ukraine 🇺🇦! 👉 Textual and visual questions, answers, and human judgment on model outputs! huggingface.co/datasets/ufa... www.arxiv.org/abs/2507.22752

huggingface.coufal/cus-qa · Datasets at Hugging FaceWe’re on a journey to advance and democratize artificial intelligence through open source and open science.

The problem: Most QA benchmarks focus on globally known facts. But real users ask about local geography, culture, and history. We collected questions from native speakers in Czechia 🇨🇿, Slovakia 🇸🇰, and Ukraine 🇺🇦 about facts locals know but outsiders don't.